Skip to main content

Physiological Evaluation and Quantification of Physician’s Cognitive Workload During Interaction with Computer Based Clinical System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 997 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 494))

Abstract

Tracking cognitive workload (CWL) of physicians interacting with health information technology (HIT) might be useful in order to identify high-risk tasks, and to flag situations when performance might be expected to decline. Eight physician radiation oncologists (3-faculty, 5-residents) pupillary responses were monitored during treatment-planning tasks. The average change in task evoked pupillary response (TEPR) from pre-set baseline was calculated and the percent of time that the TEPR dilated by ≥0.45 mm (from historical studies) was taken as a measure of CWL where performance degradation could be expected. Physician performance was assessed subjectively (willingness-to-approve the treatment-plan) and objectively (number and severity of errors). There was an association between CWL and subjective performance (p < 0.01), but not objective performance (p > 0.05) as assessed using logistic regression analysis. Future research is needed to further advance available methods to quantify the relationship between CWL and performance during physicians-HIT interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ayaz, H., Willems, B., Bunce, B., Shewokis, P.A., Izzetoglu, K., Hah, S., Deshmukh, A., Onaral, B.: Cognitive workload assessment of air traffic controllers using optical brain imaging sensors. Advances in Understanding Human Performance: Neuroergonomics, Human Factors Design, and Special Populations, pp. 21–31 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Calkin, B.A.: Parameters affecting mental workload and the number of simulated UCAVs that can be effectively supervised, Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colle, H.A., Reid, G.B.: Estimating a mental workload redline in a simulated air-to-ground combat mission. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 15(4), 303–319 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De Waard, D.: The Measurement of Drivers’ Mental Workload. Groningen University, Traffic Research Center, Netherlands (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liang, G.F., Lin, J.T., Hwang, S.L., Huang, F.H., Yenn, T.C., Hsu, C.C.: Evaluation and prediction of on-line maintenance workload in nuclear power plants. Human Factors Ergon. Manuf. Service Ind. 19(1), 64–77 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carswell, C.M., Clarke, D., Seales, W.B.: Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Innov. 12(1), 80–90 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaba, D.M., Lee, T.: Measuring the workload of the anesthesiologist. Anesth. Analg. 71(4), 354–361 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Souza, N., Holden, L., Robson, S., Mah, K., Di Prospero, L., Wong, C.S., Chow, E., Spayne, J.: Modern palliative radiation treatment: do complexity and workload contribute to medical errors? Int. J. Radiat. Oncol.* Biol.* Phys. 84(1), e43–e48 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Young, G., Zavelina, L., Hooper, V.: Assessment of workload using NASA task load index in perianesthesia nursing. J. PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 23(2), 102–110 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yurko, Y.Y., Scerbo, M.W., Prabhu, A.S., Acker, C.E., Stefanidis, D.: Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool. Simul. Healthc. 5(5), 267–271 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazur, L.M., Mosaly, P.R., Jackson, M., Chang, S.X., Burkhardt, K.D., Adams, R.D., Jones, E.L., Hoyle, L., Xu, J., Rockwell, J., Marks, L.B.: Quantitative assessment of workload and stressors in clinical radiation oncology. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol.* Biol.* Phys. 83(5), e571–e576 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mazur, L.M., Mosaly, P.R., Hoyle, L.M., Jones, E.L., Marks, L.B.: Subjective and objective quantification of physician’s workload and performance during radiation therapy planning tasks. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 3(4), e171–e177 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mosaly, P.R., Mazur, L.M., Jones, E.L., Hoyle, L., Zagar, T., Chera, B.S., Marks, L.B.: Quantifying the impact of cross coverage on physician’s workload and performance in radiation oncology. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 3(4), e179–e186 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahlstrom, N., Nahlinder, S.: A comparison of two recorders for obtaining in-flight heart rate data. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 31(3), 273–279 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dussault, C., Jouanin, J.C., Philippe, M., Guezennec, C.Y.: EEG and ECG changes during simulator operation reflect mental workload and vigilance. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 76(4), 344–351 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kramer, A.F.: Physiological metrics of mental workload: a review of recent progress. Multiple-task Perform., 279–328 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beatty, J.: Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychol. Bull. 91(2), 276 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hahnemann, D., Beatty, J.: Pupillary responses in a pitch-discrimination task. Percept. Psychophys. 2(3), 101–105 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peavler, W.S.: Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences. Psychophysiology 11(5), 559–566 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beatty, J., Lucero-Wagoner, B.: The pupillary system. Handb. Psychophysiol. 2, 142–162 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Juris, M., Velden, M.: The pupillary response to mental overload. Physiol. Psychol. 5(4), 421–424 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Karatekin, C., Couperus, J.W., Marcus, D.J.: Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses. Psychophysiology 41(2), 175–185 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Veltman, J.A., Gaillard, A.W.K.: Physiological workload reactions to increasing levels of task difficulty. Ergonomics 41(5), 656–669 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, J.H., Qin, P.P., Raisch, J., Wang, R.B.: Predictive modeling of human operator cognitive state via sparse and robust support vector machines. Cogn. Neurodyn. 7(5), 395–407 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Averty, P., Athenes, S., Collet, C., Dittmar, A.: Evaluating a new index of mental workload in real ATC situation using psychophysiological measures. In: Proceedings of the 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference, vol. 2, pp. 7A4-1. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reimer, B., Mehler, B.: The impact of cognitive workload on physiological arousal in young adult drivers: a field study and simulation validation. Ergonomics 54(10), 932–942 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazur, L.M., Mosaly, P.R., Hoyle, L.M., Jones, E.L., Chera, B.S., Marks, L.B.: Relating physician’s workload with errors during radiation therapy planning. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 4(2), 71–75 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marshall, S.P.: The index of cognitive activity: measuring cognitive workload. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, pp. 7–5. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Granholm, E., Asarnow, R.F., Sarkin, A.J., Dykes, K.L.: Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. Psychophysiology 33(4), 457–461 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, K.: Effects of flight factors on pilot performance, workload, and stress at final approach to landing phase of flight. Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kass, S.J., Cole, K.S., Stanny, C.J.: Effects of distraction and experience on situation awareness and simulated driving. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 10(4), 321–329 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Patten, C.J., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., Nilsson, L., Svenson, O.: Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38(5), 887–894 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stein, E.S.: The Measurement of Pilot Performance: A Master-Journeyman Approach (No. DOT/FAA/CT-83/15). Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center, Atlantic City, NJ (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was originally funded by the UNC Healthcare System. The data analysis was partially supported by the grant numbers R18HS023458 and R21HS024062 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Finally, we want to express our gratitude to all participants for their time and effort while participating in our experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prithima Reddy Mosaly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mosaly, P.R., Mazur, L., Marks, L. (2017). Physiological Evaluation and Quantification of Physician’s Cognitive Workload During Interaction with Computer Based Clinical System. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in The Human Side of Service Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 494. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41947-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41947-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41946-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41947-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics