Abstract
The construction industry is frequently cited for its poor safety performance. In spite of this, many countries continue to rely on contemporary, prescriptive approaches to improve performance in the sector. In Australia, one such approach, Safe Work Method Statements (SWIMS), have been mandated in construction work. However, there is limited empirical research on SWIMS, so their ability to improve health and safety is largely unknown. This is a significant gap in our knowledge. Recent research suggests that Resilience Engineering (RE), which is an innovation in organisational health and safety management, offers a promising approach, by understanding the gap between work as imagined and work as performed. SWIMS provide a practical tool by which such a gap can be investigated in construction settings. Recent research also suggests that organisations are part of a broader socio-technical system. As such, gaining a view of the different elements of the system is an important first step towards developing an understanding of the role SWIMS play in health and safety risk management. This paper first describes the socio-technical system that constitute construction work; followed by an exploration of the meaning SWIMS as ascribed by the external agencies as the first ‘outsider’ of this system. It is based on an analysis of data collected as part of a larger PhD study of the prescription and practice of SWMS in the Australian construction industry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cheng, E.W.L., Ryan, N., Kelly, S.: Exploring the perceived influence of safety management practices on project performance in the construction industry. Saf. Sci. 50, 363–369 (2012)
Swuste, P., Frijters, A., Guldenmund, F.: Is it possible to influence safety in the building sector? Saf. Sci. 50, 1333–1343 (2012)
Bakri, A., Zin, M., Misnan, M.S., Mohammed, A.H.: Occupational safety and health (OSH) management systems: towards development of safety and health culture. In: 6th Asia–Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (ASPEC 2005), pp. C19–C28 (2005)
Rozenfeld, O., Sacks, R., Rosenfeld, Y., Baum, H.: Construction job safety analysis. Saf. Sci. 48, 491–498 (2010)
Choudhry, R.M., Fang, D.: Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: investigating factors on construction sites. Saf. Sci. 46, 566–584 (2008)
Dingsdag, D.P., Biggs, H.C., Sheahan, V.L., Cipolla, D.J.: A Construction Safety Competency Framework: Improving OH&S Performance by Creating and Maintaining a Safety Culture. Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation (2006)
Azari-Rad, H., Philips, P., Thompson-Dawson, W.: Subcontracting injury rates in construction. In: 55th Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 240–247. IRRA (2003)
Vimonsatit, V., Nikraz, O.: Occupational health and safety: an expected learning outcome of civil engineering graduates. In: 2011 AAEE Conference, pp. 536–542 (2011)
Al-Humaidi, H.M., Tan, F.H.: Construction safety accidents, laws and practices in Kuwait. In: Gurasciao, M., Brebbia, C.A., Garzia, F. (eds.) WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, vol. 108, pp. 399–408. WIT Press (2009)
Bertelsen, S., Koskela, L.: Approches to managing complexity in construction project management. In: Becon 2005: The 1st International Conference on Complexity and the Built Bnvironment, pp. 1–13 (2005)
Doloi, H., Lim, M.Y.: Measuring performance in construction projects—a critical analysis with an australian perspective. In: Construction and Building Research Conference of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, 6–7 Sept. RICS, Georgia Tech, Atlanta USA (2007)
Borys, D.: The role of safe work method statements in the Australian construction industry. Saf. Sci. 50, 210–220 (2012)
Pillay, M., Borys, D., Else, D.: Exploring safe work method statements in the Australian construction industry. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium, pp. 203. MINES ParisTech, Paris (2010)
Dekker, S.: Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety. Appl. Ergon. 34, 233–238 (2003)
Besnard, D., Greathead, D.: A cognitive approach to safe violations. Cogn. Technol. Work 5, 272–282 (2003)
Alper, S.J., Karsh, B.: A systematic review of safety violations in industry. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41, 739–754 (2009)
Schein, E.H.: Three cultures of management: the key to organizational learning. Sloan Manage. Rev. 38, 27–38 (1996)
Huber, S.A., van Wijgerden, I., de Witt, A., Dekker, S.W.A., Hollnagel, E.: Resilience Engineering: New Directions for Measuring and Maintaining Safety in Complex Systems—4th Progress Report. School of Aviation, Lund University (2007)
Nemeth, C.P.: Resilience engineering: the birth of a notion. In: Hollnagel, E., Nemeth, C.P., Dekker, S.W.A. (eds.) Resilience Engineering Volume I: Remaining Sensitive to the Possibility of Failure, pp. 3–8. Ashgate, Aldershot (2006)
Wreathall, J.: Properties of resilient organizations: an initial view. In: Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Leveson, N.G. (eds.) Resilience Engineering Concepts and Precepts, pp. 275–285. Ashgate, Aldershot (2006)
Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D.: Epilogue: resilience engineering precepts. In: Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Leveson, N.G. (eds.) Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts, pp. 347–358. Ashgate, Aldershot (2006)
Cook, R.I., O’Connor, M., Render, M.L., Woods, D.D.: Operating at the sharp end: the human factors of complex technical work and its implication for patient safety. In: Manuel, B.M., Nora, P.F. (eds.) Surgical Patient Safety: Essential Information for Surgeons in Today’s Environment, pp. 19–30. American College of Surgeons, Chicago (2004)
Cook, R.I., Rasmussen, J.: Going solid: a model of system dynamics and consequences for patient safety. Qual. Saf. Healthc. 14, 130–134 (2005)
Rasmussen, J., Svedung, I.: Proactive Risk Management in a Dynamic Society. Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Karlstad (2000)
Ale, B.J.M., Brighton, P.W.M., Baram, M.: Risk management. Saf. Sci. Monit. 10 (2006) (Article 2)
Rasmussen, J.: Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27, 183–213 (1997)
Cole, T.R.H., The Honourable: Reform—Occupational Health and Safety, vol. 6. Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry (2003)
Department of Employment and Workplace Relations: Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005. Canberra (2010)
Office of Federal Safety Commissioner: Fact Sheet: Guidance for Producing Safe Work Method Statements (SWMS). In: Department of Education, E.a.W.R. (ed.). Office of Federal Safety Commissioner, Canberra (2010)
Safe Work Australia: How to Manage Health and Safety Risks: Draft Code of Practice. SafeWork Australia, Canberra (2010)
Hitt, M.A., Beamish, P.W., Jackson, S.E., Mathieu, J.E.: Building theoretical and emprical bridges across levels: multilevel research in management. Acad. Manage. J. 50, 1385–1399 (2007)
Wiig, S., Aase, K.: Fallible humans in infallible systems? Learning from errors in healthcare. Saf. Sci. Monit. 11 (2007) (Article 6)
Wiig, S., Lindoe, P.H.: Patient safety on the interface between hospital and risk regulator. J. Saf. Res. 12, 411–426 (2009)
National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (NOHSC): regulation impact statement for the draft national code of practice for the prevention of falls in general construction. In: National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (ed.). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra (2005)
Safe Work Australia: Code of Practice: Construction Work. Safe Work Australia, Canberra (2012)
Jones, P.H., Nemeth, C.: Cognitive artifacts in complex work. In: Ambient Intelligence for Scientific Discovery, pp. 152–183 (2005)
Norman, D.A.: Cognitive artifacts. In: Carroll, J.M. (ed.) Designing Intercation: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface, pp. 17–38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
WorkSafe Victoria: Working safely in the housing construction industry: a handbook for the construction regulations. In: Victorian WorkCover Authority (ed.), vol. VWA 1125/01/01.08. WorkSafe Victoria, Melbourne (2008)
WorkSafe Victoria: Working safely in the general construction industry: a handbook for the construction regulations. In: Victorian WorkCover Authority (ed.). WorkSafe Victoria, Melbourne (2008)
Ayers, G., Culvenor, J.F., Sillitoe, J., Else, D.: Meaningful and effective consultation and the construction industry of Victoria, Australia. Constr. Manage. Econ. pp. 1–25 (2012) (iFirst)
Hollnagel, E.: From protection to resilience: changing views on how to achieve safety. In: Eighth International Symposium of the Australian Aviation Psychology Association. (2008)
Hale, A.R., Swuste, P.: Safety rules: procedural freedom or action constraint? Saf. Sci. 29, 163–177 (1998)
Master Builders Australia: Submission to Safe Work Australia Model Work Health and Safety Regulations and Model Codes of Practice. (2011)
Acknowledgments
The work reported in this paper is part of the author’s PhD research project, and which was supported through an Australian Postgraduate Award 2010–2012. The author is greatly indebted to the regulator and associations, and the individuals who voluntarily participated in this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pillay, M. (2016). Resilience Engineering, Gaps and Prescription of Safe Work Method Statements Part 1: The View of Organisational Outsiders. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 491. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41929-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41929-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41928-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41929-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)