Skip to main content

Facilitative Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 695 Accesses

Abstract

Many of the broad managerial trends, that is, the Lean tradition, have a strong focus on operations at the production line level and tend to overemphasize explicit knowledge. This chapter demonstrates, based on empirical evidence from a global car part producer, the importance and the strength of tacit knowledge components as value-creation ingredients. The discussion relates to the old controversy between Ohno and Nemoto (the father of Toyota Production System and the first quality director at Toyota) whereby the former posed that actual quality awareness was in the minds of the operators as opposed to the explicit forms of instructions and checklists which typically are the focus of production managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By highly automated production lines mean huge investments in production equipment, robot, and so on that eliminate labor-intensive work. These production lines operate at high production rate and high cycle time.

  2. 2.

    Look at former chapter of organizational learning for more detail.

  3. 3.

    ‘Obeya rooms ’ is taken from Japanese and means simply big room. Here, the project meets with many different forms, pictures, and diagrams hanging to give instant, up-to-date information about the project. For more information about how this works see Morgan and Liker (2006).

  4. 4.

    He is a regarded professor from Wharton in University of Pennsylvania. And he is the co-author of the famous book ‘The Nature of the Firm’ explaining the theories of the Nobel Prize winner R.H. Coase. The other co-author was Williamson, another Nobel Prize winner.

  5. 5.

    3K’s = Kitanai or dirty, Kitsui or difficult, Kiken or dangerous.

  6. 6.

    In many places, the production lines are divided into many small sub-lines. A small stop in one sub-line does not stop the entire production line, thereby making it more robust. It is also easier for employees because there are fewer machines to deal with, maintain, and learn about. However, each employee must still learn several machines in order to do his/her job.

  7. 7.

    In the Lean tradition it is called SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die) . Principally, the dividing tool changes into external and internal. The external is about doing everything that can be done before stopping the production lines (finding hand tools, pre-warming the die, informing people, etc.) and the internal is the actual changing of die including the stop of a production line.

  8. 8.

    Volvo still owned by Ford at the time of interview.

  9. 9.

    SMED = Single-Minute Exchange of Dies production tool which means changes be made in less time by separating the internal and external setup operations. External is everything that can be done without stopping the production. The clue is to do most of the work externally so that the internal job becomes as little as possible and the production stop is kept to a minimum.

References

  • Armstrong, P. (2002). The costs of activity-based management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(1–2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00031-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, S. R. (1996). The modern corporation and American political thought: Law, power, and ideology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, D., Goldberg, M., Haas, A., Juselius, K., Kirman, A., Lux, T., et al. (2009). The financial crisis and the systemic failure of the economics profession. Critical Review, 21(2–3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810902934109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1988a). How cost accounting distorts product cost. Management Accounting, 69(10), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1988b). Measure cost right: Making the right decisions. Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N., Pedersen, T., Pyndt, J., & Schultz, M. (2012). Innovating organization and management. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (1999). Capability building and over-adaptation: A case of ‘fat design’ in the Japanese auto industry. In Y. Lung, J.-J. Chanaron, & D. Raff (Eds.), Coping with variety: Flexible productive systems for product variety in the auto industry (pp. 261–286). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1997). The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to management: Great companies are defined by purpose, process, and people. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, M., Mitchell, J. C., & Barnes, J. A. (1963). The village headman in British Central Africa. In M. Gluckman (Ed.), Order and rebellion in tribal Africa. London: Cohen & West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. J., & González Santos, J. L. (1992). Industrial democracy as process: Participatory action research in the Fagor cooperative group of Mondragón. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschhorn, L. (1997). Reworking authority: Leading and following in the post-modern organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingvaldsen, J. A., Holtskog, H., & Ringen, G. (2013). Unlocking work standards through systematic work observation: Implications for team supervision. Team Performance Management, 19(5/6), 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, A., & Kalsaas, B. T. (2009). Suppliers and strategies for upgrading in global production networks. The case of a supplier to the global automotive industry in a high-cost location. European Planning Studies, Special Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. T., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. A. (1989, March–April). The human cost of manufacturing reform. Harvard Business Review, 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., & Liker, J. K. (2006). The Toyota product development system, integrating people, process and technology. New York: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. New York: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, G. (2010). Organizational learning and knowledge in the Norwegian automotive supplier industry. Doctor philosophiae, NTNU, Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1997). Corporate business and capitalist classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, K. (1995). Humanization of the production system and work at Toyota Motor Co and Toyota Motor Kyushu. In Å. Sandberg (Ed.), Enriching production – Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to Lean production (pp. 383–404). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, K. (1998). A new Toyotaism. In M. Freyssenet, A. Mair, K. Shimizu, & G. Volpato (Eds.), One best way? (pp. 63–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimokawa, K., & Fujimoto, T. (2010). The birth of Lean. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, M. (2009). RIP, MBA. CNBC.com. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.com/id/29895258

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2009). The anatomy of a murder: Who killed America’s economy? Critical Review, 21(2–3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810902934133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Why Economists Failed to Predict the Financial Crisis. (2009). Knowledge at Wharton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law & Economics, 22(2), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world: Based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holtskog, H., Carayannis, E.G., Kaloudis, A., Ringen, G. (2018). Facilitative Management. In: Learning Factories. Palgrave Studies in Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41887-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics