Skip to main content

Development of Suspension Parts Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 704 Accesses

Abstract

From a macro and national perspective, this chapter focuses on the specificities of a manufacturing sector, that is, the Norwegian automotive industry. The chapter introduces the reader to product development in the industry, demonstrating how the organization learns (or not) from the one product development project to the next. This descriptive approach as to how product development occurs in real settings is in stark contrast to the one presented in the firms’ formal description of quality management systems and other types of formal displays. This chapter provides therefore, a unique insight in a) the discrepancies between firms’ fragmented and not always coinciding representations of realities of real production processes and b) the challenges firms’ meet in accumulating knowledge and know-how between projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    COP = customer-oriented processes.

  2. 2.

    In the case companies and in the rest of the industry at Raufoss.

  3. 3.

    Process FMEA (PFMEA) —how the risks regard the production processes (FMEA for products is called Design FMEA/DFMEA).

  4. 4.

    The root cause is the real problem and not the symptoms of a problem. There are many techniques to find the root cause, for example: 5 times why, PDCA, LAMDA, and so on.

  5. 5.

    The governing rules are operationalized rather than questioned.

  6. 6.

    Behavior that inhibit the questioning of governing rules.

  7. 7.

    DRBFM = Design Review Based on Failure Mode.

  8. 8.

    PDCA = Plan, Develop, Control, and Act. A method for finding the root cause of a problem and permanently solving it.

References

  • Andersen, B. (1999). Business process improvement toolbox. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning ΙΙ: Theory, method, and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, L. (2001). Total quality management in a research and development environment. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1993). Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch (2nd ed.). Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgaard, J. J., Kristensen, K., Kanji, G. K., Juhl, H. J., & Sohal, A. S. (1998). Quality management practices: A comparative study between east and west. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15(8/9), 812–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Motor-Company. (2004). FMEA handbook version 4.1. Ford Design Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (1997). The dynamic aspect of product development capabilities: An international comparison in the automobile industry. In A. Goto & H. Odagiri (Eds.), Innovation in Japan (pp. 57–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (1999). The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotzamani, K. D., & Tsiotras, G. D. (2001). An empirical study of the ISO 9000 standard’s contribution towards total quality management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(10), 1326–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harry, M. J., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Six Sigma: The breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. New York: Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirokazu, S., & Hiroshi, N. (2005). Reliability problem prevention method for automotive components-development of GD’3’ activity and DRBFM method for stimulating creativity and visualizing problems. Transaction of Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan, 36(4), 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. K. M. (1995). Is the ISO 9000 series for total quality management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. N. (2003). Product development for the Lean enterprise, why Toyota’s system is four times more productive and how you can implement it. Richmond: The Oaklea Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiella, M. L., & Golhar, D. Y. (1997). Total quality management in an R&D environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17(2), 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. (2007). Tools & technology. Presentation. Gardermoen, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J., & Hoseus, M. (2008). Toyota culture: The heart and soul of the Toyota way. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., & Liker, J. K. (2006). The Toyota product development system, integrating people, process and technology. New York: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, J. S. (2003). Total quality management: Text with cases. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T. (1978). The Toyota production system. Tokyo: Diamond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. A. (2010). The Six Sigma handbook: A complete guide for green belts, black belts, and managers at all levels. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. F. (1959). Banana Time: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization, 18, 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimokawa, K., & Fujimoto, T. (2010). The birth of Lean. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, G., & Clausing, D. (1990). Robust quality. Harvard Business Review, 68(1), 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, G., Elsayed, E. A., & Hsiang, T. C. (1989). Quality engineering in production systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1949). The social structure of the restaurant. American Journal of Sociology, 54, 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world: Based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holtskog, H., Carayannis, E.G., Kaloudis, A., Ringen, G. (2018). Development of Suspension Parts Project. In: Learning Factories. Palgrave Studies in Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41887-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics