Advertisement

Development of Magnetorheological Elastomers (MREs) for Strength and Fatigue Resistance

  • J. McIntyre
  • S. Jerrams
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Materials Science book series (SSMATERIALS, volume 247)

Abstract

Natural rubber (NR)-based magnetorheological elastomers (MREs) exhibiting a reasonable switching effect were fabricated and tested. They were strong enough for use in automotive applications but still needed protection against ageing. Ethylene–propylene–diene rubber (EPDM) is a cost-effective material that is frequently used in the automotive industry because of its advantageous range of properties. With these applications in mind, it was a logical progression to the development of EPDM-based MREs. Unlike strain-crystallising NR, EPDM requires reinforcement to render its tensile and fatigue strength suitable for use in most applications. While small amounts of carbon black were sufficient for the NR-based MREs, a trade-off between non-reinforcing carbonyl iron powder (CIP) and reinforcing carbon black fillers was necessary to imbue the EPDM-based MREs with reasonably good mechanical properties. With a limit on the quantities of fillers that could be added, attention was turned to the matrix material itself and the blend of polymers employed in EPDM2 and EPDM3 were chosen in order to strengthen the EPDM-based MREs by enhancing polymer molecular weight and reinforcement. However, an unwanted effect of the stronger polymer network was the high-viscosity matrix in these compounds which hindered the alignment of magnetic particles early in the vulcanisation process. This led to poorer magnetic particle orientation, resulting in a more homogenous dispersion of the CIP and consequently produced MRE specimens that were more isotropic than anisotropic. Subsequently the switching effect of these materials was lower than would be obtained in MREs with a low viscosity (say, 40 MU) matrix. It was not feasible to sacrifice reinforcing carbon black in these compounds, but there are other possibilities open to the rubber compounder. An alternative means of reducing the viscosity of EPDM3 is simply to double the content of softening oil. This would have a slight but minimal negative effect on the tensile properties of the material. The addition of a small amount of retardant to delay vulcanisation and extend the time available for orientation of the magnetic particles into chains would also be beneficial. This would also reduce the modulus of the compound, but the reduction would again be negligible. As in all material design, there is a trade-off to be made in choosing the right combination of properties, but both of these changes would result in the development of an effective magnetorheological compound.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The support of the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF, Grant no. 16SV3757) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Magnetorheological elastomers with continually adjustable hardness. Information brochure, Fraunhofer-Institut für Silicatforschung ISC, Würzburg. http://www.cesma.de/content/dam/isc/cesma/de/documents/3_MR_Elastomers_2013_.pdf. 1 June 2017
  2. 2.
    Nguyen, Q., Choi, S., Wereley, N.M.: Optimal design of magnetorheological valves via a finite element method considering control energy and a time constant. Smart Mater. Struct. 17, 1–12 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenfeld, N., Wereley, N.M.: Volume-constrained optimization of magnetorheological and electrorheological valves and dampers. Smart Mater. Struct. 13, 1303–1313 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu, W., Robinson, R., Wereley, N.M.: A design strategy for magnetorheological dampers using porous valves. In: 11th Conference on Electrorheological Fluids and Magnetorheological Suspensions, (Dresden, 25.–29.08.2008), Journal of Physics: Conference Series 149, 4 p. (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, Y., Li, J., Tian, T., Li, W.: A highly adjustable magnetorheological elastomer base isolator for applications of real-time adaptive control. Smart Mater. Struct. 22, 095020 (2013). (18 pages)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reichert Jr., B.A.: Application of Magnetorheological Dampers for Vehicle Seat Suspensions. Master thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marcu, F.: Semiactive Cab Suspension Control for Semitruck Applications. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carlson, D.J., Leroy, D.F., Holzheimer, J.C., Prindle, D.R., Marjoram, R.H.: Magnetorheological Fluid Brake. US Patent 5460585 A (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, L., Gong, X., Jiang, W., Yao, J., Deng, H., Li, W.: Investigation on magnetorheological elastomers based on natural rubber. J. Mater. Sci. 42, 5483–5489 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, W., Gong, X., Sun, T., Fan, Y., Jiang, W.: Effect of cyclic deformation on magnetorheological elastomers. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 23, 226–230 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stepanov, G., Abramchuk, S., Grishin, D., Nikitin, L., Kramarenko, E.: Khokhlov, A: Effect of a homogenous magnetic field on the viscoelastic behaviour of magnetic elastomers. Polymer 48, 488–495 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guan, X., Dong, X., Ou, J.: Magnetostrictive effect of magnetorheological elastomer. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 158–163 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carbonyl Iron Powder: Information brochure, BASF SE, Ludwigshafen. https://www.dispersion-spigments.basf.com/portal/load/fid827906/CIP_General_PO_e.pdf. 18 Nov 2015
  14. 14.
    Jolly, M.R., Carlson, J.D., Munoz, B.C., Bullions, T.A.: The magnetoviscoelastice response of elastomer composites consisting of ferrous particles embedded in a polymer matrix. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 7, 613–622 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boczkowska, A., Awietjan, S.F., Wejrzanowski, T., Kurzydlowski, K.J.: Image analysis of the microstructure of a magnetorheological elastomers. J. Mater. Sci. 44, 3135–3140 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boczkowska, A., Awietjan, S.F.: Smart composites of urethane elastomers with carbonyl iron. J. Mater. Sci. 44, 4104–4111 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McIntyre, J., Jerrams, S., Steinke, E., Maslak, A., Wagner, P., Möwes, M., Alshuth, T., Schuster, R.: Optimisation and characterisation of magnetorheological elastomer. In: Jerrams, S., Murphy, N. (eds.) Constitutive Models for Rubber VII. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden (2011), pp. 313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abraham, F.: The Influence of Minimum Stress on the Fatigue Life of Non Strain-Crystallising Elastomers. PhD thesis, Coventry University, Coventry (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lokander, M., Reitberger, T., Stenberg, B.: Oxidation of natural rubber-based magnetorheological elastomers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 86, 467–471 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Keller, R.W.: Oxidation and ozonation of rubber. Rubber Chem. Technol. 58, 637–652 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, L.-H.: Mechanisms of oxidative degradation I. Oxidation of synthetic rubbers catalyzed by metallic ions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 10, 1699–1715 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhou, Y., Jerrams, S., Chen, L.: The effect of microstructure on the dynamic equi-biaxial fatigue behaviour of magnetorheological elastomers. In: Gil-Negrete, N., Alonso, A. (eds.) Constitutive Models for Rubber VIII. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013), pp. 683–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McIntyre, J., Alshuth, T.: Crack propagation in magnetorheological elastomers (MREs). KGK Kautsch. Gummi Kunstst. 66, 29–35 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. McIntyre
    • 1
  • S. Jerrams
    • 2
  1. 1.DKI – The German Institute of Rubber TechnologyHanoverGermany
  2. 2.Centre for Elastomer ResearchDublin Institute of TechnologyDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations