Skip to main content

Individual and Societal Risk (RiskIS): Beyond Probability and Consequence During Hurricane Katrina

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disaster Forensics

Abstract

The classical definition of risk revolves around probability and consequence. However, individuals can have varying understanding of risk which in turn affects their decisions and actions. The varying understanding and actions stem from to deep-seated fundamental assumptions (i.e., beliefs and predispositions). However, deep-seated fundamental assumptions are often not included in traditional risk measures of probability and consequences. This chapter attempts to close this gap by developing a risk framework, RiskIS, that includes individual and society measures influencing decisions and actions. These measures are developed by examining literature and contrasting the resulting measures with a well-known event: Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. A synthesis of this research provides a wider array of measures that influence decisions and actions (i.e., norms and personal attitudes, organizational structures, knowledge base, and social context, degree of connectivity, race and ethnicity, mass media, and national ideology). The proposed framework provides a basis for inclusion of a contextual frame of reference that influence actions beyond probability and consequence. Implications for those involved in disaster management are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aaron MM, Dunlap RE (2000) Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Soc Probl 47(4):499–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ackoff RL (1974) Systems, messes, and interactive planning. In: Redesigning the future: systems approach to societal problems. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 20–33

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adeola FO (2007) Nativity and environmental risk perception: an empirical study of native-born and foreign-born residents of the USA. Hum Ecol Rev 14(1):13–25

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASCE (2009) Guiding principles for the nation’s critical infrastructure. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barry JM (1997) Rising tide: the great Mississippi flood of 1927 and how it changed America. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beck U (2006) Living in the world risk society. Econ Soc 35(3):329–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnside R, Miller DMS, Rivera JD (2007) The impact of information and risk perception on the hurricane evacuation decision-making of greater New Orleans residents. Sociol Spectr 27(6):727–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calida BY, Katina PF (2012) Regional industries as critical infrastructures: a tale of two modern cities. Int J Crit Infrastruct 8(1):74–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell NM (2009) Hurricane Katrina and the perception of risk: incorporating the local context. University of Central Florida, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chatterjee S, Abkowitz MD (2011) A methodology for modeling regional terrorism risk. Risk Anal 31(7):1133–1140. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01565.x

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Weck OL, Roos D, Magee CL (2011) Engineering systems: meeting human needs in a complex technological world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Douglas M (1992) Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eisenman DP, Cordasco KM, Asch S, Golden JF, Glik D (2007) Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health 97(Supplement_1):109–115

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elder K, Xirasagar S, Miller N, Bowen SA, Glover S, Piper C (2007) African Americans’ decisions not to evacuate New Orleans before Hurricane Katrina: A qualitative study. Am J Public Health 97(Supplement 1):S124–S129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Escobar, A. (2004). Beyond the third world: imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalisation social movements. Third World Q 25(1):207–230. doi:10.1080/0143659042000185417

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gheorghe AV, Katina PF (2014) Editorial: Resiliency and engineering systems—Research trends and challenges. Int J Crit Infrastruct 10(3/4):193–199

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gheorghe AV, Masera M, Weijnen MPC, De Vries JL (eds) (2006) Critical infrastructures at risk: securing the European electric power system, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hill KN (2012) Risk quadruplet: integrating assessments of threat, vulnerability, consequence, and perception for homeland security and homeland defense (Ph.D.). Old Dominion University, United States—Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  20. INCOSE (2011) In: Cecilia H (ed) Systems engineering handbook: a guide for system life cycle processes and activities, 3.2 ed. INCOSE, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  21. Katina PF (2015) Systems theory-based construct for identifying metasystem pathologies for complex system governance (Ph.D.). Old Dominion University, United States—Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  22. Katina PF, Keating CB, Jaradat RM (2014) System requirements engineering in complex situations. Requirements Eng 19(1):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Keating CB, Katina PF, Bradley JM (2014) Complex system governance: concept, challenges, and emerging research. Int J Syst Syst Eng 5(3):263–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Knabb RD, Rhome JR, Brown DP (2011) Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Katrina 23–30 August 2005. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, pp 1–43

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kröger W, Zio E (2011) Vulnerable systems. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin J (2006) The meaning of the 21st century: a vital blueprint for ensuring our future. Riverhead Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Masys A (ed) (2015) Disaster management: enabling resilience. Springer International Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. McKinnon R (2002) Social risk management: a conceptual fallacy of composition. Risk Manag 4(2):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Merriam-Webster (2006) Webster’s new explorer encyclopedic dictionary. Federal Street Press, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  30. Metz B, Kuijpers L, Solomon S, Anderson SO, Davidson O, Pons J, Meyer L et al (eds) (2005) Safeguarding the ozone layer and the global climate system: issues related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Needle D (2004) Business in context: an introduction to business and its environment, 4th edn. Cengage Learning Business Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. NHC (2015) Saffir-Simpson Hurricane wind scale. Retrieved 16 Dec 2015, from http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutsshws.php

  33. Parsons VS (2007) Searching for “Unknown Unknowns.” Eng Manag J 19(1):43–46. doi:10.1080/10429247.2007.11431721

    Google Scholar 

  34. Paté-Cornell ME, Dillon RL (2006) The respective roles of risk and decision analyses in decision support. Decis Anal 3(4):220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pinto CA, McShane MK, Bozkurt I (2012) System of systems perspective on risk: towards a unified concept. Int J Syst Syst Eng 3(1):33–46. doi:10.1504/IJSSE.2012.046558

    Google Scholar 

  36. Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schein E (1992) Organizational culture and leadership: a dynamic view. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  39. Seed RB, Bea RG, Abdelmalak RI, Athanasopoulos A., Boutwell GP Jr, Bray JD, Cohen-Waeber J et al (2006) Investigation of the performance of the New Orleans Flood Protection System in Hurricane Katrina on 29 Aug 2005. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  40. Seed RB, Bea RG, Abdelmalak RI, Athanasopoulos-Zekkos A, Boutwell GP, Briaud JL, Govindasamy AV et al (2008) New Orleans and hurricane Katrina. I: introduction, overview, and the east flank. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134:701

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sills GL, Vroman PE, Wahl RE, Schwanz PE (2008) Overview of New Orleans levee failures: lessons learned and their impact on national levee design and assessment. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134:556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Suh NP (2005) Complexity: theory and applications. Oxford University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tainter JA (1988) The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Taleb NN (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House Trade Paperbacks Edition, New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tansey J, O’riordan T (1999) Cultural theory and risk: a review. Health Risk Soc 1(1):71–90. doi:10.1080/13698579908407008

    Google Scholar 

  46. Thissen WA, Herder PM (2003) Critical infrastructures: state of the art in research and application. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Tierney KJ (1999) Toward a critical sociology of risk. Sociol Forum 14(2):215–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tokgoz BE (2012) Probabilistic resilience quantification and visualization building performance to hurricane wind speeds (Ph.D.). Old Dominion University, United States—Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  49. Townsend FF (2006) The federal response to Hurricane Katrina: lessons learned. US Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vamanu BI, Gheorghe AV, Katina PF (2016). Critical Infrastructures: Risk and vulnerability assessment in transportation of dangerous goods, Vol 31. Cham: Springer International Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  51. Weber EU, Hsee C (1998) Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Manage Sci 44(9):1205–1217

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was partly supported by a grant from the National Centers for System of Systems Engineering (NCSOSE) and Emergent Risk Initiative (ERI) @ Old Dominion University. NCSOSE is a university Enterprise Research Center of the Batten College of Engineering and Technology focused on decision making for multidisciplinary problems. The vision of ERI@ODU is to create the next generation body of knowledge in risk management for current and future systems and organizations characterized by uncertainty, emergence, complexity, and interdependence.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Polinpapilinho F. Katina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Katina, P.F. (2016). Individual and Societal Risk (RiskIS): Beyond Probability and Consequence During Hurricane Katrina. In: Masys, A. (eds) Disaster Forensics. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41849-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics