Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Outstanding Contributions to Logic ((OCTR,volume 10))

Abstract

We explain the use of category theory in describing certain sorts of anyons . Yoneda’s lemma leads to a simplification of that description. For the particular case of Fibonacci anyons , we also exhibit some calculations that seem to be known to the experts but not explicit in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Other answers explained the physics, in terms of excitations, but these matters are not the subject of this paper, which is specifically about mathematics except for the introductory material summarized in Sect. 8.2.

  2. 2.

    For more on the notion of fusion, see Remark 1 at the end of this introduction.

  3. 3.

    Here we use the so-called Schrödinger picture of quantum mechanics . A physically equivalent alternative view, the Heisenberg picture, has the states remaining constant in time, while the operators modeling properties of the state evolve by conjugation with a one-parameter group of unitary operators.

  4. 4.

    A few discrete symmetries can be modeled by anti-unitary transformations.

  5. 5.

    In the infinite-dimensional case, the description is similar but one must take into account the possibility of a continuous spectrum of the operator, in addition to or instead of discrete eigenvalues.

  6. 6.

    In fact, inner products are never explicitly assumed in [9]. They are, however, implicit in the statement, in Sect. 5.1 of [9], that certain bases “are – of course – related by a unitary transformation”.

  7. 7.

    There are set-theoretic issues if \(\mathscr {C}\) is a proper class rather than a set, but these issues need not concern us here. The finiteness conditions imposed on our anyon category \(\mathscr {A}\) ensure that it is equivalent to a small, i.e., set-sized, category.

  8. 8.

    We have chosen to regard \(V_1\) and \(V_\tau \) as each being a single space, independent of the parenthesization. The different parenthesizations give (possibly) different bases for these spaces. An alternative view is that each parenthesization gives its own \(V_1\) and \(V_\tau \), isomorphic to \(\mathbb {C}\) and \(\mathbb {C}^2\) respectively, with their standard bases, while \(\alpha \) gives an isomorphism between the two \(V_1\)’s and an isomorphism between the two \(V_\tau \)’s. The two viewpoints are easily intertranslatable and the computations that follow would be the same in either picture.

References

  1. Bagchi, B., & Misra, G. (2000). A note on the multipliers and projective representations of semi-simple Lie groups. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, 62, 425–432.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonderson, P. H. (2007). Non-abelian anyons and interferometry. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freyd, P. (1964). Abelian categories: An introduction to the theory of functors. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giulini, D. (2007). Superselection rules. http://arxiv.org/pdf/0710.1516.pdf.

  5. Kauffman, L., & Lomonaco, S. (2010). Topological quantum information theory. In S. Lomonaco (Ed.), Quantum information science and its contribution to mathematics. Proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics (Vol. 68, pp. 103–177). American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kitaev, A. (2003). Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Annals of Physics, 303, 2–30. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9707021.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mac Lane, S. (1971). Categories for the working mathematician. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 5. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nayak, C., Simon, S., Stern, A., Freedman, M., & Das Sarma, S. (2008). Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 80, 1083–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Panangaden, P., & Paquette, É. O. (2011). A categorical presentation of quantum computation with anyons, Chapter 15. In B. Coecke (Ed.), New structures for physics. Lecture Notes in Physics (Vol. 813, pp. 983–1025). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raghunathan, M. S. (1994). Universal central extensions. Reviews of Modern Physics, 6, 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Z. (2010). Topological quantum computation. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics (Vol. 112). American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Blass .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blass, A., Gurevich, Y. (2016). On Quantum Computation, Anyons, and Categories. In: Omodeo, E., Policriti, A. (eds) Martin Davis on Computability, Computational Logic, and Mathematical Foundations. Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41842-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics