Advertisement

Overview of Urban Planning Principles and Practice

  • Donald OkekeEmail author
Chapter
  • 317 Downloads
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

The inception of participatory planning perspectives in Africa in the 1980s was a direct result of global trends linked with the activities of external assistance agencies. As neoliberal participatory planning perspective (planning without a plan), in which a market metaphor in development processes determines planning approach, the relevance of formal planning as a rational instrument to manage the distribution of activities in space diminishes in practice. Regardless, quantitative and qualitative research was used to establish the resilience of formal planning. Thus formal master planning remains a universal planning instrument and the idea of new master planning is underway amidst upsurge in neoliberal planning initiatives interpreted loosely as participatory planning perspective. It was found that spatial integration eludes neoliberal participatory planning initiatives in Africa.

Keywords

Participatory Master planning Market Africa Capitalism Imperialism 

References

  1. Ayorinde AA, Asamu SO (2000) Integrated physical planning for the maximization of the use of scarce resources: sustainable cities program approach. In: Being paper presented at the 31st annual conference of The Nigerian Institute of Town Planners (NITP) held on 25th–27th October, 2000 at Conference Hall, Shiroro Hotel, Minna, Niger StateGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis M (2004) Planet of slums. New Left Rev 26:1–23Google Scholar
  3. Dawkins CJ (2003) Regional development theory: conceptual foundations, classic works, and recent developments. J Plann Lit 18(2):131–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Devas N (2001) Does city governance matter for the urban poor? Int Plann Stud 6(4):393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eng TS (1992) Planning principles in pre- and post-independence Singapore. The Town Plann Rev 63(2):163, 183pGoogle Scholar
  6. Faludi A (2005) Territorial cohesion: an unidentified political objective—introduction to the special issue. Town Plann Rev 76(1):1–13 (In Faludi, A. ed. Territorial cohesion: an unidentified political objective. Special issue)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedmann J (2005) Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Prog Plann 64(3):183–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giannakourou G (1996) Towards a European spatial planning policy: theoretical dilemmas and institutional implications. Eur Plann Stud 4(5):608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harisson P, Todes A (2001) The use of spatial frameworks in regional development in South Africa. Reg Stud 35(1):65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ilesanmi FA (1998) The role of master plans in land administration and physical development in Adamawa State: the case of greater Yola master plan. In: Ilesanmi FA (ed) Master planning approach to physical development: the Nigerian experience. Paraclete Publishers, Yola, pp 58–65Google Scholar
  11. Isard W (1955) Hybrid land use representation. Available at: http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch6en/conc6en/hybridlu.html Date of access: 2nd August, 2013
  12. Janin RU (2003) Shaping European spatial planning: how Italy’s experience can contribute. The Town Plann Rev 74(1):66, 68pGoogle Scholar
  13. Janin RU (2005) Cohesion and subsidiary. Towards good territorial governance in Europe. Town Plann Rev 76(1):93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Janin RU, Faludi A (2005) The hidden face of European spatial planning: innovations in governance. Eur Plann Stud 13(2):208, 211pGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiriko KG (2004) Effective management of rapid urbanization in Nigeria: the need for more appropriate planning paradigms. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, UNECGoogle Scholar
  16. Krugman P (1999) The role of geography in development. Int Reg Sci Rev 22(2):142–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nadin V, Stead D (2008) European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP 172(1):35, 40–41pGoogle Scholar
  18. Okeke DC (2005) Towards a global system of planning practice: the Nigerian component. In: Fadare W et al (eds) Globalization, culture and the Nigerian built environment. Ile-Ife: ObafemiAwolowo University, 87pGoogle Scholar
  19. Onyebueke VU (2011) Place and function of African cities in the Global Urban Network: exploring matters arising. Urban Forum 22:1–21Google Scholar
  20. Schoonraad MD (2000) Some reasons why we built unsustainable cities in South Africa. In: Strategies for a sustainable built environment. Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, August 2000Google Scholar
  21. Tawfik RM (2008) NEPAD and African development: towards a new partnership between development actors in Africa. Afr J Int Aff 11(1):55–70Google Scholar
  22. Todes A (2012) Urban growth and strategic spatial planning in Johannesburg, South Africa. Cities 29:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tunnard C (1951) Creative urbanism. The Town Plann Rev 22(3):234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UNCHS (1996) Sustainable cities: lessons from a global United Nations program. Briefing for the Berlin-Conference on Sustainable Development delivered by Jochen Eigen, Coordinator, SCP, UNCHSGoogle Scholar
  25. UNCHS (1999) City experiences in improving the urban environment. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  26. Watson V (2002) The usefulness of normative planning theories in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa. Plann Theor 1(1):27–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Watson V (2006) Deep difference: diversity, planning and ethics. Plann Theor 5(1):31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watson V (2009) The planned city sweeps the poor away…: urban planning and 21st century urbanization. Prog Plann 72:153–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.African Settlements Research Group, Department of Urban and Regional PlanningUniversity of NigeriaEnuguNigeria

Personalised recommendations