Abstract
There are traditional and international perspectives of meta-theories of planning. The traditional perspectives are embedded in worldviews and philosophies, which mark traditional communities as unique societies. This work reviewed ujamaa philosophy based on socialist principles in East Africa, the ubuntu ideology based on survivalist structures (i.e. the extended family) in Southern Africa and the omenani philosophy of Ibo socialism built on spirituality amongst the Ibos in South-Eastern Nigeria, West Africa. International perspectives portray meta-theories as trade methodologies. Classical liberalism nurtured popular design tradition in planning, fettered capitalism nurtured formal master planning theory and neoliberalism nurtured neoliberal participatory planning theory. The precepts of neoliberal planning theory amount to the reinvention of planning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anarcho (2005) Neoliberalism as the new mercantilism. Available at http://www.anarkismo.net/article/192 Date of access 17 Feb 2015
Baeten G (2012) Neoliberal planning: does it really exist? In: Tasan-Kok T, Baeten G (eds) Contradictions of neoliberal planning. Department of Social and Economic Geography, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden pp 206–210
Coleman DC (1969) Revisions in mercantilism. Methuen, London
Cornelli EM (2012) A critical analysis of Nyerere’s Ujamaa: an investigation of its foundations and values. (Being a doctoral thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham. Centre for the Study of Global Ethics Department of Philosophy The University of Birmingham)
Davies R, Thurlow J (2009) Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Discussion Paper 00943
El Mahdi A (2002) Towards decent work in the informal sector: the case of Egypt. International Labour Office (ILO), Geneva
Gerxhani K (2004) The informal sector in developed and developing countries: a literature survey. Public Choice 120(3/4):264–294
Goonewardena K (2007) Planning and Neo-liberalism: the challenge for radical planning. Progressive Plann Magazine, 22 July
Hettne B (2014) Neo-mercantilism: what’s in a word. Available at: http://rossy.ruc.dk/ojs/index.php/ocpa/article/viewFile/3924/2090, pp 205–229, Date of access 4 Mar 2015
Hicks J (1998) Enhancing the productivity of urban Africa. In: Proceedings of an International conference research community for the habitat agenda. linking research and policy for the sustainability of human settlement held in Geneva, 6–8 July
Mark T, Potter C (2004) Neo-liberalism, neo-mercantilism and multi-functionality: contested political discourses in a European post-Fordist rural transition. EPMG working paper. Available at: www.irsa-world.org/prior/XI/papers/2-8.pdf Date of access 17 Feb 2015
Martinez E, Garcia A (2000) What is “neo-liberalism?”—a brief definition. Available at: http://www.globalexchange.org/resources/econ101/neoliberalismdefined Date of access 18 Aug 2013
Mohammadzadeh M (2011) Neo-liberal planning in practice: urban development with/without a plan (A post-structural investigation of Dubai’s development). Paper Presented in Track 9 (spatial policies and land use planning) at the 3rd World Planning Schools Congress, Perth (WA), 4–8 July 2011
Nyerere JK (1962) ‘Ujamaa’ the basis of African socialism. Dar es Salaam, April
Peck J, Theodore N, Brenner N (2009) Post-neo-liberalism and its malcontents. Antipode 41(1):94–116
Raza W (2007) European union trade politics: pursuit of neo-mercantilism in different arenas? In: Becker J, Blaas W (eds) Switching arenas in International trade negotiations. Ashgate, Aldershot
Thorsen E, Lie A (No Year) What is neo-liberalism. Available at: http://folk.uio.no/daget/neoliberalism.pdf Date of access 17 Aug 2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okeke, D. (2016). Meta-Theoretical Frameworks of (Spatial) Planning. In: Integrated Productivity in Urban Africa. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41830-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41830-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41829-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41830-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)