Advertisement

Introduction

  • Donald OkekeEmail author
Chapter
  • 243 Downloads
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

The resilience of the epistemological foundations of imperialism is diagnosed to be the problem with urban productivity in Africa. Planning responses fail to address this malaise because planning scholarship barely extends beyond the consideration of the science of planning. The meta-theory of planning, which engages the influence of development ideologies on planning, is seldom considered. This omission disenfranchises planning in the chessboard of political economy. At the moment, planning in neoliberal dispensation is delivering dependency in which spatial systems in Africa function as imperial instruments. An extended definition of terms is given in anticipation of the launch of the new planning theory.

Keywords

Imperialism Epistemology Resilience Formal planning Neoliberal planning Productivity Informalization 

References

  1. Adams A, Alden J, Harris N (2006) Regional development and spatial planning in an enlarged European Union. Ashgate, Hampshire, 8, 13, 44, 50pGoogle Scholar
  2. Albers G (1986) Changes in German town planning: a review of the last sixty years. Town Plann Rev 57(1):17–34Google Scholar
  3. Altschuler AA (1965) The city planning process: a political analysis. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbury J (2005) From urban sprawl to compact city—an analysis of urban growth management in Auckland. Thesis, PhD Auckland University, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  5. Arpke F (1942) Land use control in the urban fringe of Portland, Oregon. J Land Public Utility Econ 18(4):468–480Google Scholar
  6. Bairoch P (1975) The economic development of the third world since 1900. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Berke PR (2002) Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. J Plann Lit 17(1):22–24, 29Google Scholar
  8. Christaller W (1933) Central places in Southern Germany’ translated by CW Baskin. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  9. Chukuezi CO (2010) Urban informal sector and unemployment in third world cities: the situation in Nigeria. Asian Social Science. 6(8):133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cilliers EJ (2010) Creating sustainable urban form: the urban development boundary as a planning tool for sustainable urban form: implications for the Gauteng City Region. Vdm Verlag, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark S (2013) The ideological foundations of neo-liberalism. Available at: www.heathwoodpress.com/ Date of access 2 Jan 2016
  12. Craven JM (2009) Neoclassical economics and neoliberalism as neo-imperialism. A presentation to Institute of Marxism Research of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Available at https://jimcraven10.wordpress.com/. Date of access 2 Jan 2016
  13. David H (2005) A brief history of neo-liberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 235pGoogle Scholar
  14. Dembele DM (1998) Africa in the twenty-first century. 9th General Assembly CODESRIA Bulletin ISSN 0850-8712 No 1, pp 10–14Google Scholar
  15. Devon DB (2011) Neo-colonialism, imperialism and resistance in the 21st century. global research. Available at www.globalresearch.ca/. Date of access 2 Jan 2016
  16. Edwardo EE (1990) Community design and the culture of cities. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, 356pGoogle Scholar
  17. Frank AG (1971) Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. Penguin, HarmondwortsGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedmann J (1965) Response to Altshuler: comprehensive planning, as a process. J Am Institute Planners 31(3):195–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graves PE, Sexton RL (1979) Overurbanization and its relation to economic growth for less developed countries. Econ Forum 8(1):95–100 (Reprinted in Ghosh KP 1984:160–166)Google Scholar
  21. Hansen WB (1968) Metropolitan planning and the new comprehensiveness. J Am Institute Planners 34(5):295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawksley C (2004) Conceptualizing imperialism in the 21st century. Being a paper presented at the 2004 Australian Political Studies Association Conference at the University of Adelaide. Available at https://www.adelaide.edu.au/apsa/docs_papers/Others/Hawksley.pdf. Date of access 26 Nov 2015
  23. Healey P (1997) The revival of strategic spatial planning in Europe. In: Healey P, Khakee A, Motte A, Needham B (eds) Making strategic spatial plans: innovation in Europe. UCL Press, London, pp. 3–19Google Scholar
  24. Hicks J (1998) Enhancing the productivity of urban Africa. In: Proceedings of an International Conference Research Community for the Habitat Agenda. Linking Research and Policy for the Sustainability of Human Settlement held in Geneva, July, 6–8Google Scholar
  25. Katz C (2002) Imperialism in the 21st century. Available at www.katz.lahaine.org/. Date of access 2 Jan 2016
  26. Krugman P (1990) The role of geography in development. Int Reg Sci Rev 22(2):142–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kunzmann KR (2004) Culture, creativity, and spatial planning. Town Plann Rev 75(4):384–385, 397pGoogle Scholar
  28. Landman K (2004) Gated communities in South Africa: the challenge for spatial planning and land use management. Town Plann Rev 75(2):163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lowder S (1986) Inside third world cities. Chrome Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Majekodunmi A, Adejuwon KD (2012) Globalization and African political economy: the Nigerian experience. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 2(8):189–206Google Scholar
  31. Markusen A (1985) Profit cycles, oligopoly, and regional development. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Martinez E, Garcia A (2000) What is ‘Neo-liberalism?’—a brief definition. Available at: http://www.globalexchange.org/resources/econ101/neoliberalismdefined. Date of access 18 Aug 2013
  33. Meyerson M (1973) Building the middle-range bridge for comprehensive planning. In: Faludi A (ed) A Reader in planning theory. Pergamum, Oxford and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohammadzadeh M (2011) Neo-liberal planning in practice: urban development with/without a plan (A post-structural investigation of Dubai’s development). Paper Presented in Track 9 (Spatial Policies and Land Use Planning) at the 3rd World Planning Schools Congress, Perth (WA), 4–8 July 2011Google Scholar
  35. Mommsen WJ (1982) Theories of Imperialism. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Myrdal G (1957) Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Nabudere DW (2003) Towards a new model of production—an alternative to NEPAD. 14th Biennial Congress of AAPS. Durban, South Africa. www.mpai.ac.ug. Date of access 8 July 2011
  38. Nourse HO (1968) Regional economics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Okeke DC (2015) An analysis of spatial development paradigm for enhancing regional integration within national and its supporting spatial systems in Africa. Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Philosophiae Doctor in Urban and Regional Planning at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  40. Owusu F (2007) Conceptualizing livelihood strategies in African cities: planning and development implications of multiple livelihood strategies. J Plann Edu Res 26(4):450–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perrons D (2004) Understanding social and spatial divisions in the new economy: new media clusters and the digital divide. Econ Geogr 80(1):45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perroux F (1950) Economic space: theory and applications. Quart J Econ 64(1):89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts B (1978) Of peasants. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Roy A (2009) Why India cannot plan its cities: informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Plann Theory 8(1):76–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Santos N (1979) The shared space. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Simone A (1998) Urban processes and change in Africa. CODESRIA Working Papers 3/97 Senegal, 12pGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor CB, Jordan G (2009) Neoliberalism: from new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Stud Comp Int Dev 44(2):144Google Scholar
  48. Todes A, Karam A, Klug N, Malaza N (2010) Beyond master planning? New approaches to spatial planning in Ekurhuleni, South Africa. Habitat Int 34:414–416, 419pGoogle Scholar
  49. Wallerstein I (2004) World-systems analysis: an introduction. Duke University Press, USA, 128pGoogle Scholar
  50. Wallerstein I (1974) The modern world system, vol I. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Watson V (2009) ‘The planned city sweeps the poor away…: urban planning and 21st century urbanization. Progress Plann 72:153–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weber A (1929) Theory of the location of industries. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  53. Welsh Assembly Government 2008 Peoples, Places Furture - Wales Spatial Plan. Available at www.torfaen-gov.uk/....Planning/SD78 Date of access 20th July 2016.
  54. World Bank (1989) Sub-Saharan Africa: from crisis to sustainable growth. The World Bank, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.African Settlements Research Group, Department of Urban and Regional PlanningUniversity of NigeriaNsukkaNigeria

Personalised recommendations