Myanmar as a Post-conflict Society?

  • Lahpai Nang Sam AungEmail author
  • Hkawn Ja Aung
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace book series (BRIEFSSECUR, volume 28)


Given the background of conflict and displacement in Myanmar provided in Chap.  1, this chapter explores the concept of a ‘post-conflict society’ and provides a framework for examining whether Myanmar has shifted into a ‘post-conflict’ state. The chapter begins with a review of the literature on the necessary elements of peace-building and post-conflict reconstruction to achieve stability. It identifies three phases of ‘post-conflict’ transition namely, initial response, transformation, and fostering sustainability, concluding that Myanmar is currently in a ‘transformation’ phase with the potential of becoming a post-conflict society. Beyond the negotiation of ceasefires, the transition into a ‘post-conflict society’ requires the development of legitimate mechanisms of governance and participation, secure foundations of justice and reconciliation, and sustainable structures that improve social and economic well-being. The Myanmar government’s current efforts towards these aims have included attracting foreign investment and amending relevant laws, and establishing mechanisms for governance and participation through its three-phase peace plan. On the other hand, the government’s policies and supporting institutions for refugees and IDPs remain inadequate for supporting return. The authors discuss these ongoing challenges highlight key issues that have yet to be addressed in negotiations.


Armed Group Peace Process Military Government Peace Negotiation Durable Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Association of the U.S. Army, and Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2002. “Post-Conflict Reconstruction Task Framework.”
  2. Brown, M. 2012. Details of Myanmar’s New Foreign Investment Law. Mayer Brown. Retrieved from
  3. Burma News International. 2014. Deciphering Myanmar’s Peace Process: A Reference Guide. Chiang Mai University: Burma News International.Google Scholar
  4. Burma News International, ed. 2014. Deciphering Myanmar’s Peace Process: Reference Guide 2014. First edition. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Burma News International.Google Scholar
  5. Buzan, B. 1993. Societal security, state security and internationalisation. Identity, migration and the new security agenda in Europe, 41–58.Google Scholar
  6. Chantavanich, S., Vungsiriphisal, P., & Laodumrongchai, S. 2007. Thailand policies towards migrant workers from Myanmar. Asian Research Center for Migration (ARCM), Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkoprn University.Google Scholar
  7. Egreteau, R. 2012. Assessing Recent Ethnic Peace Talks in Myanmar. Asian Ethnicity, 13(3), 311–313Google Scholar
  8. Fenn, M. 2013. Life gets tougher on the Thailand–Myanmar border. The Nation.Google Scholar
  9. Gabaudan, Michel, and Melanie Teff. 2014. “Myanmar: Act Immediately to Protect Displaced People’s Rights.” Refugees International.
  10. Gegory B. Poling, A. K. 2013. The Status of Myanmar’s Peace Process.Google Scholar
  11. Giannini, F. L. a. T. 2005. Traditions of conflict resolution in Burma. Chiang Mai: Earthrights International.Google Scholar
  12. Holliday, I. 2010. Ethnicity and Democratization in Myanmar. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(2), 111–128.Google Scholar
  13. Juillet. 2013. Taking the Pulse on Burmese repatriation. Bangkok Post. Google Scholar
  14. Ji, T. 2012. Lessons from the Kachin Development experiences: Kachin Development Networking Group (KDNG).Google Scholar
  15. Karen News. 2014. “Thailand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs Clarifies Its Position On Refugee Return.” Karen News, July 18.
  16. Kaung, B (2011). Burma’s President Invites Exiles to Return Home. The Irrawaddy. August 17, 2011. Retrieved from
  17. Lederach, J. P. 1989. Director’s circle. Conciliation Quarterly, 8(3), 12–14.Google Scholar
  18. Lei.N.T 2014. UNHCR under fire from community groups on refugee repatriation process. KAREN NEWS. Google Scholar
  19. Lintner.B 2014, Finding a Federal Model that Fits. The Irrawaddy. Saturday, March 8, 2014. Retrieved from
  20. Long, K 2013. A historical review of UNHCR policy and practice on refugee repatriation.UNHCR.Google Scholar
  21. Mang, P. Z. 2012. Burman, Burmanisation and Betrayal. Studies in World Christianity, 18(2).Google Scholar
  22. Martin, S. 2007. State of Strife: the Dynamics of Ethnic Conflict in Burma. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  23. Miall, H. 2004. Conflict transformation: A multi-dimensional task. Transforming Ethnopolitical Conflict (pp. 67–89): Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Mae Fah Luang Launches New Round Of Refugee Camp Surveys. KAREN NEWS. Google Scholar
  25. Ministry of Information. 2008. Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar (2008). English Version and Myanmar Version. Printed by Printing & Publishing Enterprise, Ministry of Information.Google Scholar
  26. Naing, S.Y. 2013. Most Burmese Refugees in Thailand Don’t Want Return: Survey. The Irrawaddy. Google Scholar
  27. Phan, Z 2014. Refugees on the Thai–Burma Border: Ready for Return? Open Democracy.Google Scholar
  28. Post Conflict Reconstruction 2002. AUSA/CSIS Framework.Google Scholar
  29. Poling, Gregory B., and Amy Killian. 2013. “The Status of Myanmar’s Peace Process.” Center for Strategic International Studies. July 18.
  30. South, A. (2013). Governance and Legitimacy in the Myanmar Peace Process. Singapore: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung LTD.Google Scholar
  31. Thailand Burma Consortium-TBC 2013. Burma Still Not Ready for Return of Refugees from Thailand: TBC. Bangkok Post. Google Scholar
  32. Thawnghmung, A. M., & Myoe, M. A. 2008. Myanmar in 2007: A Turning Point in the “Roadmap”?Google Scholar
  33. The Border Consortium. 2014. What Refugees Say… Burma Partnership. August 10, 2014 Retrieved from
  34. Thein, T.T. 2014, Burmese govt agrees, in principle, to a federal union. DVB. 16 August 2014. Retrieved from
  35. Transnational Institute. 2012. Ending Burma’s Conflict Cycle? Prospects for Ethnic Peace (pp. 16). The Netherlands: Transnational InstituteGoogle Scholar
  36. Transnational Institute. 2013. Burma’s Ethnic Challenge:From Aspirations to Solutions. The Netherlands: Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
  37. UNHCR. 2014. UNHCR Country Operations Profile—Myanmar 2014.Google Scholar
  38. Xinhua. 2012. Myanmar New Gov’t Creates Job Opportunities for 450,000 People. Global Times. Retrieved from Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s)  2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations