Advertisement

Sustainable Return: A Case Study of Refugee Return to Lao PDR in the 1980s–1990s

  • Min MaEmail author
  • Vongsa Chayavong
Chapter
  • 384 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace book series (BRIEFSSECUR, volume 28)

Abstract

The possibility of repatriation has recently come under heavy discussion along the Thai–Myanmar border. The discourse around ‘sustainable return’ looks beyond long-term development and focuses on four kinds of insecurities (namely, physical insecurity, social and psychological insecurity, legal insecurity, and material insecurity). Repatriation and reintegration are thus viewed as a durable solution only when these aspects of displacement are addressed in an integrated and effective manner. Based on this framework of sustainable return, this chapter begins with a discussion on the standard of voluntary repatriation in accordance with international principles (including the principle of non-refoulement). It then outlines the conditions that induce voluntary repatriation using a case study on repatriation of Indochinese refugees from Thailand to Lao PDR and Cambodia in the 1980s. It describes the security conditions in which repatriation occurred, and highlights the challenges and successes of return in this context, including policies adopted by Lao PDR and the roles of UNHCR and the RTG.

Keywords

Sustainable Return Displace Person Refugee Woman Temporary Shelter Durable Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amnesty International. 1997. “Rwanda: Human Rights Overlooked in Mass Repatriation.” AFR47/02/97. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  2. Assembly of Heads of State and Government. 1969. “OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa.” United Nations, Treaty Series, No. 14, vol 691.Google Scholar
  3. Black, Richard, and Saskia Gent. 2004. “Defining, Measuring and Influencing Sustainable Return: The Case of the Balkans.” University of Sussex, Brighton, England: Department Research Centre on Migration, Globalisation and Poverty. http://www.migrationdrc.org/publications/working_papers/WP-T7.pdf.
  4. Black, Richard, and Saskia Gent. 2006. “Sustainable Return in Post-Conflict Contexts.” International Migration 44 (3): 15–38.Google Scholar
  5. Chantavanich, Supang. 1988. “Introduction.” In Indochinese Refugees: Asylum and Resettlement. Chulalongkorn University: Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  6. Chantavanich, Supang, ed. 1992. The Lao Returnees in the Voluntary Repatriation Program from Thailand. Occasional Paper Series, no. 003. Bangkok, Thailand: Indochinese Refugee Information Center, Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
  7. Chantavanich, Supang. 2011. “Cross Border Displaced Persons from Myanmar in Thailand.” In Thailand Migration Report 2011, edited by Jerrold Huguet and Aphichat Chamratrithirong. Bangkok, Thailand: IOM.Google Scholar
  8. Chantavanich, Supang, and Tawin Pleansri, eds. 2011. The Lao Hmong in Thailand: State Policies and Operations (1975–2009). Bangkok: Sriboon Computer-Printing.Google Scholar
  9. Chimni, B.S. 2003. “Post-Conflict Peace-Building and the Return of Refuge: Concepts, Practices, and Institutions.” In Refugees and Forced Displacement: International Security, Human Vulnerability, and the State, edited by Edward Newman and Joanne van Selm. Tokyo ; New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chimni, B. S. 2004. “From Resettlement to Involuntary Repatriation: Towards a Critical History of Durable Solutions to Refugee Problems.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 23 (3): 55–73. doi: 10.1093/rsq/23.3.55.
  11. Colloquium on the International Protection of Refugees in Central America, Mexico and Panama. 1984. “Cartagena Declaration on Refugees.” OAS Document OEA/SER.L/V/II.66/doc. 10, rev. 1. pp. 190–93.Google Scholar
  12. Crisp, Jeff. 2010. “Forced Displacement In Africa: Dimensions, Difficulties, And Policy Directions.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 29 (3): 1–27. doi: 10.1093/rsq/hdq031.
  13. Crisp, Jeff. 2000. “Africa’s Refugees: Patterns, Problems and Policy Challenges.” Working Paper No. 28. Geneva: UNHCR Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit.Google Scholar
  14. Fransen, Sonja, and Katie Kuschminder. 2012. “Back to the Land: The Long-Term Challenges of Refugee Return and Reintegraiton in Burundi.” 242. New Issues in Refugee Research. Geneva: UNHCR Policy Development and Evaluation Service. http://www.unhcr.org/5040ad9e9.html.
  15. Hammond, L. 1999. “Examining the Discourse of Repatriation: Towards a More Proactive Theory of Return Migration.” In The End of the Refugee Cycle?: Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  16. Hein, Jeremy. 2006. Ethnic Origins: The Adaptation of Cambodian and Hmong Refugees in Four American Cities. American Sociological Association’s Rose Series in Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Lacey, Marilyn. 1987. “1: A Case Study in International Refugee Policy: Lowland Lao Refugees.” Center for Migration Studies Special Issues 5 (2): 17–33. doi: 10.1111/j.2050-411X.1987.tb00492.x.
  18. Lanphier, C. Michael. 1993. “The Final Phase of Southeast Asian Asylum?—Some Unfinished Business.” Refuge 13 (5): 3–7.Google Scholar
  19. Leckie, Scott. 2000. “Going Home: Land and Property Issues.” Forced Migration Review 7 (April).Google Scholar
  20. Long, Katy. 2010. “Home Alone: A Review of the Relationship between Repatriation, Mobility and Durable Solutions for Refugees.” Geneva: UNHCR Policy Development and Evaluation Service. http://www.unhcr.org/4b97afc49.html.
  21. Milner, James. 2009. “Refugees and the Regional Dynamics of Peacebuilding.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 28 (1): 13–30.Google Scholar
  22. Robinson, Court. 1998. Terms of Refuge: The Indochinese Exodus & the International Response. Politics in Contemporary Asia. London ; New York : New York: Zed Books ; Distributed in the USA exclusively by St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rodicio, A. G. 2001. “Restoration of Life: A New Theoretical Approach to Voluntary Repatriation Based on a Cambodian Experience of Return.” International Journal of Refugee Law 13 (1 and 2): 123–41. doi: 10.1093/ijrl/13.1_and_2.123.
  24. Sommer, Rebecca. 2006. Report on the Situation in the Xaysomboun Special Zone and 1100 Hmong-Lao Refugees Who Escaped to Petchabun, Thailand 2004–2005. Earth Peoples.Google Scholar
  25. UNHCR. 1951. “Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.” http://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html.
  26. UNHCR. 1996. “Voluntary Repatriation: International Protection—Handbook.” Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  27. UNHCR. 1997. “The State of the World’s Refugees: A Humanitarian Agenda.” Geneva: UNCHR.Google Scholar
  28. UNHCR. 1998. “Oversight Issues: Reintegration.” EC/48/SC/CRP.15. http://www.unhcr.org/3ae68cf510.html.
  29. UNHCR. 2000. “The State of The World’s Refugees 2000: Fifty Years of Humanitarian Action.” State of the World’s Refugees. Geneva. http://www.unhcr.org/3ebf9bad0.pdf.
  30. UNHCR. 2004. “Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities.” UNHCR.Google Scholar
  31. UNHCR. 2008. “UNHCR’s Role in Support of the Return and Reintegration of Displaced Populations.” UNHCR. http://www.unhcr.org/4c2203309.html.
  32. UNHCR. 2012. “The State of the World’s Refugees: In Search of Solidarity.” UNHCR.Google Scholar
  33. UNHCR. 2013. “UNHCR Statistical Yearbook 2013.” Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  34. United Nations General Assembly. 1948. “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml.
  35. Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children. 1991. “Repatriation and Reintegration: Can Hmong Refugees Begin to Look Homeward?” Women’s Refugee Commission.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s)  2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations