Abstract
This chapter will explore the nature, purposes, practices and appropriateness of competence-based education for teachers’ professional development within international contemporary policy contexts. Competence-based education is regarded as an efficient and effective means for educational organisations and teachers, to better meet the changing demands of the labour market. However, whilst competence itself is an essential characteristic of teachers, it is only a baseline from which to progress to higher levels of practice. Those seeking continuing improvement are unlikely to be satisfied with a judgement of competence alone. The chapter will characterise the ground which teachers and schools occupy as composed of ‘sites of struggle’. It will examine the challenges of policy changes and the parallel rise of forms of competence-based education for teachers’ professionalism and professional development. It will take the position that the overuse of functional competences is likely to narrow the agenda and that because teaching is a complex blend of the cognitive and emotional, skills, knowledge, attributes and values, they should not dominate. Narrowly defined competences are only one part of the necessary toolkit which teachers need in order to teach to their best. Moreover, where competency-based systems of professional development exist, they must provide opportunities for teachers themselves to engage in deeper learning which includes but goes beyond the use of strong data systems and knowledge of external requirements related only to externally defined sets of standards. Teaching is more than the sum of competences; however, these may be defined. Professional development opportunities and activities should reflect this.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aelterman, A. (1995). Academic teacher education: The development of a curriculum-concept in response to sociological challenges and widened views on the teacher profession. Ph.D. thesis. University of Ghent, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences.
American Workforce. (2001). Report on the American workforce. Washington DC: US Department of Labor.
Ball, S. J. (2001, November). The teachers’ soul and the terrors of performativity. Research Students Society, Issue 38, University of London, Institute of London, England.
Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence: Knowledge, higher education and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Brennan, M. (1996). Multiple professionalisms for Australian teachers in an important age. New York: American Educational Research Association.
Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2003). Defending liberalism in education theory. Journal of Education Policy, 18(4), 355–373.
Brundrett, M., & Silcock, P. (2002). Achieving competence, success, and excellence in teaching. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis Group.
Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Casperson, J. (2013). Professionalism among novice teachers: How they think, act, cope and perceive knowledge. Ph.D. thesis, Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
Cohn, M., & Kottkamp, R. (1993). Teachers: The missing voice in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.
Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., Brown, E., Ahtaridou, E., & Kington, A. (2007). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes (Research Report DCSF-RR108). Department for Children, Schools and Families. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/11329/1/DCSF-RR108.pdf
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Rev. ed.). Boston: D. C. Heath.
DfE. (2013). NFER Teacher Voice Omnibus November 2012 Survey: New teachers’ standards and appraisal regulations. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nfer-teacher-voice-omnibus-november-2012-survey-new-teachers-standards-and-appraisal-regulations
Eisner, E. (1979). The educational imagination. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Eisner, E. (1996). Creating and beyond: Art education for a changing world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eraut, M., Alderton, J., Cole, G., & Senker, P. (2000). Development of knowledge and skills at work. In F. Coffield (Ed.), Differing visions of a learning society: Research findings (Vol. 1). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Etzioni, A. (1969). The semi-professionals and their organisations: Teachers, workers, social workers. New York: Free Press.
European Commission. (2012). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. http://ec.europa.eu/education/school-education/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf
Flores-Crespo, P. (2004). Situating education in the human capabilities approach. In M. Walker & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 45–65). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Freire, P. (1972). Cultural action for freedom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Halliday, J. (1996). Empiricism in vocational education and training. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 28(1), 40–56.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 6(6), 151–182.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Helsby, G. (1996). Defining and developing professionalism in English Secondary Schools. Journal of Education for Teaching, 22(2), 145–148.
Helsby, G. (1999). Changing teachers work: The reform of secondary schooling. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Hextall, I., Lawn, M., Menter, I., Sidgwick, S., & Walker, S. (1991). Imaginative projects – Arguments for a new teacher education. Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(1 and 2), 79–95.
Hill, D. (Ed.). (2013). Immiseration, capitalism and education: Austerity resistance and revolt. Brighton: Institute for Education Policy Studies (IEPS).
Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lawn, M. (1996). Modern times? Work, professionalism and citizenship in teaching. London: Falmer Press.
Lum, G. (1999). Where’s the competence in competence-based education and training? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 33(3), 403–418.
Lyotard, J. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polanyi, M. (1983). The tacit dimension. Gloucester: Peter Smith.
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robertson, S. L. (1996). Teachers’ work, restructuring and postfordism: Constructing the new ‘professionalism’. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives. London: Falmer Press.
Sachs, J. (2003). The activist professional. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sachs, J. (2011). Metaphors for continuing teacher professional development: Skilling or emancipating teachers. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Eds.), Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry. Dortdrecht: Springer.
Schon, D. A. (1996). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Seezink, A., & Poell, R. F. (2010). Continuing professional development needs of teachers in schools for competence-based vocational education: A case study from The Netherlands. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34(5), 455–474.
Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and wellbeing. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. K. (1999). Freedom, capabilities and public action: A response. Notizie di Politeia, 12, 107–125.
Shulman, L. S. (1987, February). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
Shulman, L. S. (1998). Theory, practice, and the education of professionals. The Elementary School Journal, 98(5), 511–526.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educational.
Struyven, K., & De Meyst, M. (2010). Competence-based teacher education: Illusion or reality? An assessment of the implementation status in Flanders from teachers’ and students’ points of view. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1495–1510.
Talbert, J. E., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1996). Teacher professionalism in local school contexts. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives. London: Falmer Press.
TALIS. (2013). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. OECD. http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/talis-2013-results_9789264196261-en#page1
Taylor, F. (1911). Scientific management. New York: Harper.
Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). The capability approach: Its potential for work in education. In M. Walker & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 1–18). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wallis, C., & Steptoe, S. (2006). How to bring our schools out of the 20th century. Time, 168(25), 50–56.
Wesselink, R., Lans, T., Mulder, M., & Bremans, H. J. A. (2003). Proceedings of the program presented by the research network on vocational education and training (VETNET) at the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Hamburg, Germany.
Whitty, G., & Willmott, E. (1991). Competence-based teacher education: Approaches and issues. Cambridge Journal of Education, 21(3), 309–318.
Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wolf, A. (1995). Competency-based assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wolf, A. (2011). Review of vocational education – The Wolf report. London: Department of Education.
Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. (Issues and Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Day, C. (2017). Competence-based Education and Teacher Professional Development. In: Mulder, M. (eds) Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41711-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41713-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)