Skip to main content

Comparing Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) across Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The core idea of RPL (Recognition of Prior Learning) is to promote, to make visible and to make full use of the entire scope of learning results and (work) experience gained by an individual over the lifespan and irrespective of where, when and how the learning took place. This contribution aims at reviewing, comparing and contrasting policies and practices of prior learning, its assessment and recognition across ten countries including Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. It starts with the emergence of RPL in the light of lifelong learning and a clarification of concepts and terms. It then turns on national RPL conditions and traditions in all ten countries with a particular focus on RPL procedures and assessment methods. The contribution ends with critically discussing main findings and developing recommendations for future research. Prior learning is an umbrella term for any kind of learning outcomes gained in various learning settings. Recognition of prior learning (RPL) refers to the process of identifying, assessing and recognising any learning results that were acquired by individuals in different learning contexts outside formal education and training systems. Its core idea is to promote, to make visible and to make full use of the entire scope of learning results and (work) experience gained by an individual over the lifespan and irrespective of where, when and how the learning took place.

Whereas many European countries make a distinction between formal, nonformal or informal learning and its outcomes, this is not the case with most of the non-European countries where the term ‘prior learning’ is more common.

What they have in common is a growing interest in making the results of learning processes transparent and usable for labour markets or for educational access.

Against this background, this contribution aims at reviewing, comparing and contrasting policies and practices of prior learning, its assessment and recognition across ten countries including Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. It starts with the emergence of RPL in the light of lifelong learning and a clarification of concepts and terms. It then turns on national RPL conditions and traditions in all ten countries with a particular focus on RPL procedures and assessment methods. The contribution ends with critically discussing main findings and developing recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allais, S. M., Raffe, D., Strathdee, R., Wheelahan, L., & Young, M. (2009). Learning from the first qualifications frameworks. Employment Working Paper No. 45, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, D. (2005). The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1185–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becket, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning: Practice in postmodernity. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIBB–Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung. (2013). Datenreport zum Berufsbildungsbericht 2013. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMBF–Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. (2014). Bericht zum Anerkennungsgesetz 2014. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlinger, S. (2008a). Competences as the core element of the European qualifications Framework. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43(3/1), 96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlinger, S. (2008b). Kompetenzentwicklung für Europa. Opladen: Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlinger, S. (2013). Applying ECVET principles. Final report on ECVET application in the context of recognising informal and non-formal learning. Osnabrück/Berlin/Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlinger, S., & Münchhausen, G. (2011). Recognition and validation of prior learning. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, K., Clayton, B., Bateman, A., Knight, B., Thomson, P., Hargreaves, J., Blom, K., & Enders, M. (2003). Recognition of prior learning in the vocational education and training sector. Adelaide: NCVER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstetter, G., & Luomi-Messerer, K. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010. Country report: Austria. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Council on Learning. (2009). Taking account: A report on the number of PLAR assessments conducted by public post-secondary institutions in Canada. Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charraud, A.-M. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010. Country Report: France. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colardyn, D. (1996). La gestion des compétences. Perspectives internationales. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colardyn, D., & Bjørnåvold, J. (2004). Validation of formal, non-formal and informal learning: Policy and practices in EU member states. European Journal of Education, 39(1), 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcom, J. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: A report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, D. (2014). RPL in higher education: Past, present and potential. In J. Harris, C. Wihak, & J. Van Kleef (Eds.), Handbook of the recognition of prior learning (pp. 315–336). Research into practice. Leicester: NIACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, D. (2008). Revisiting the recognition of prior learning (RPL): A reflective inquiry into RPL practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 34(2), 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, D. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010. Country report: Ireland. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2012). Recommendation on the validation of non-formal and informal learning. 2012/C 398/01. Official Journal of the European Union, C398 of 22.12.2012, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Terssac, G. (1996). Savoirs, compétences et travail. In J. M. Barbier (Ed.), Savoirs théoriques et savoirs d’action (pp. 223–248). Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvekot, R. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010 Country report: Netherlands. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, C., & Keating, J. (2005). Recognition of prior learning. ILO working paper No. 21, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1984). Students’ conceptions and textbook presentations of the movement of the moon: A study in the manufacture of misconceptions. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and Instruction, 1(3), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning, implicit learning and tacit knowledge. In F. Coffield (Ed.), The necessity of informal learning (pp. 12–31). Bristol: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001). Communiqué making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. COM(2001) 678 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, Cedefop, ICF International. (2014). European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning 2014. Final synthesis report. http://libserver.cedefop.europa.eu/vetelib/2014/87244.pdf

  • European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2008). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. PE-CONS (2008)3662/07, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Expert Group on Future Skills Needs. (2011). Developing recognition of prior learning (RPL). The role of RPL in the context of the national skills strategy upskilling objectives Dublin. http://www.skillsireland.ie/media/egfsn110411-developing_recognition_of_prior_learning.pdf

  • FSEA & SVEB. (2014). Jahresbericht 2013. Zürich: Schweizer Verband für Weiterbildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1973). The conditions of learning (2nd ed.). New York: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., Breier, M., & Wihak, C. (2011). Researching the recognition of prior learning: International perspectives. Leicester: NIACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., Wihak, C., & Van Kleef, J. (2014). Handbook of the recognition of prior learning. Research into practice. Leicester: NIACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyns, J. P. (2004). Recognition of prior learning (RPL): In search of a valid and sustainable mechanism for South Africa. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenniscentrum EVC. (2014). Toekomstbestendige inrichting van een systeem voor validering. Implementatieplan. BP ‘s-Hertogenbosch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimmer, S., Holzer, C., Schlögl, P., & Neubauer, B. (2009). Berufsreifeprüfung. Aktualisierung von Vorbereitungsangeboten, TeilnehmerInnen- und AbsolventInnenzahlen. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Unterricht, Kunst und Kultur (BMUKK). Wien: Ibw & öibf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafont, P., & Pariat, M. (2012). Review of the recognition of prior learning in member states in Europe. Paris: Working Paper of the University of Paris Est Creteil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méhaut, P., & Lecourt, A.-J. (2007). The accreditation of prior learning experience in France: A good start, to be continued. Marseille: Discussion paper of the Institute of Labour Economics and Industrial Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1995). Human capabilities, female human beings. In M. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), A study of human capabilities (pp. 61–104). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pertrulli, E., & di Francesco, G. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010. Country Report: Italy. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, A. L. O. (2005). Recognition and validation of experimental learning. Sísifo. Educational Sciences Journal, 2, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prism Economics and Analysis. (2004). Prior learning assessment and recognition: apprenticeship and trade certification in the pipe trades. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salini, D., Petrini, B., & Voit, J. (2012). Inventaire des pratiques de validation des acquis de l’expérience (VAE) en Suisse. Rapport pour la direction du processus de monitorage suisse de l’éducation et de l’office fédéral de la formation professionnelle et de la technologie (OFFT). Lugano: Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (SFIVET).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAQA − South African Qualifications Authority. (2002). The recognition of prior learning in the context of the South African National Qualifications Framework. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1973). Cognitive consequences of formal and informal education. Science, 182(4112), 553–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. (2005). Recognition, validation and certification of informal and non-formal learning. Synthesis report (Draft). Paris: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., & Duvekot, R. (2013). Linking recognition practices and national qualifications frameworks. Hamburg: Unesco Institute for Lifelong Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., & Clayton, B. (2011). Student insights and perspectives on the validation of learning outcomes. In S. Bohlinger & G. Münchhausen (Eds.), Recognition and validation of prior learning (pp. 443–460). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souto-Otero, M. (2009). Making-up people’s minds: How can VET be made more attractive and relevant to economic needs? Peer review on “Towards a new vocational training system more adjusted to the new competencies and skills requirements of the labour market”. Spain, 25–26 May 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=10776&langId=en. Accessed 05 Dec 2014.

  • Souto-Otero, M. (2010). Validation of non-formal and informal learning in Europe: Between vocationalism and social change? In G. Elliot, F. Chahid, & S. Issler (Eds.), Education and social change (pp. 251–262). London: Continuum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2014): Registered Apprenticeship Information System (RAIS). Ontario. www.statcan.gc.ca. Accessed 03 Dec 2014.

  • Theisen, G., & Adams, D. (1990). International comparative education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, N., & Harris, J. (2014). Trends and issues in the professional development of RPL practitioners. In J. Harris, C. Wihak, & J. Van Kleef (Eds.), Handbook of the recognition of prior learning. Research into practice (pp. 233–258). Leicester: NIACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2012). UNESCO guidelines for the recognition, validation and accreditation of the outcomes of non-formal and informal learning. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ure, O. B. (2007). Lifelong learning in Norway. A deflating policy balloon or an act of piecemeal implementation? Oslo: Fafo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleef, J. (2014). Life after PLAR – The post-assessment success of candidates. In J. Harris, C. Wihak, & J. Van Kleef (Eds.), Handbook of the recognition of prior learning. Research into practice (pp. 356–383). Leicester: NIACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • VOX–Norwegian Agency for Lifelong Learning. (2010). Recognition of prior learning used as the basis for exemption in higher education. Oslo.http://www.vox.no/no/global-meny/English/Accreditation/Reports-and-resources/

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, K. (1996). Comparative education. In P. Gordon (Ed.), A guide to educational research (pp. 360–397). London/Portland: Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werquin, P. (2014). Labour markets and national qualifications frameworks: A policy perspective. In J. Harris, C. Wihak, & J. Van Kleef (Eds.), Handbook of the recognition of prior learning. Research into practice (pp. 86–111). NIACE: Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wihak, C. (2006). State of the field review: Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR). A report commissioned by the Canadian Council on Learning (CCL). Ottawa: CCL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful, constructive and thoughtful comments of the editors and especially Judith Harris on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Bohlinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bohlinger, S. (2017). Comparing Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) across Countries. In: Mulder, M. (eds) Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41711-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41713-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics