Skip to main content

Measuring the Influences of Footwear Shape and Area on the Coefficient of Friction by English XL

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 489))

Abstract

This study explores the influences of different footwear shapes and areas on COF by conducting a four factors experiment including five footwear areas, two footwear shapes, two floors with different roughness, and three floor contaminating conditions and the COFs were measured by English XL. The results demonstrate that the footwear area, footwear shape, floor roughness, and floor contamination condition all affect COF significantly. The COFs of square footwear treads are significantly higher than the cofs of round footwear treads. The relationships between shoe sole area and COF were affected by floor roughness dramatically. The relationships between different shoe sole area and COFs did not show any rules. The lower the floor roughness the lower the COFs with the larger shoe sole area under water and detergent contamination conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Safety Council: Injury Facts. Itasca, IL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leamon, T.B., Murphy, P.L.: Occupational slips and falls: more than a trivial problem. Ergonomics 38, 487–498 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, C.C., Liu, L., Li, K.W., Chen, C.Y.: The cases study of occupational falling and slipping incidents. In: 19th Triennial Congress of the IEA, Melbourne (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. BAuA: Safety on floors and stairs. http://www.baua.de/en/Topics-from-A-to-Z/Workplaces/Floors-and-stairs_content.html

  5. Liberty Mutual: 2014 Liberty Mutual Workplace Safety Index. http://www.libertymutualgroup.com

  6. Health and Safety Executive: What do slip and trip accidents cost? http://www.hse.gov.uk/slips/costs.htm

  7. Health and Safety Executive: Assessing the slip resistance of flooring, http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/geis2.htm

  8. Chang, W.R., Kim, I.J., Manning, D.P., Bunterngchit, Y.: The role of surface roughness in the measurement of slipperiness. Ergonomics 44, 1200–1216 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, W.R., Matz, S.: The slip resistance of common footwear materials measured with two slipmeters. Appl. Ergon. 32, 549–558 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang, W.R.: The effects of slip criteria and time on friction measurements. Saf. Sci. 40, 593–611 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, K.W., Hsu, Y.W., Chang, W.R., Lin, C.H.: Friction measurements on three commonly used floors on a college campus under dry, wet, and sand-covered conditions. Saf. Sci. 45, 980–992 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, L., Li, K.W., Lee, Y.H., Chen, C.C., Chen, C.Y.: Friction measurements on “anti-slip” floors under shoe sole, contamination, and inclination conditions. Saf. Sci. 48, 1321–1326 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, D.F.: The friction and lubrication of elastomers, International series of monographs on material science and technology. Pergamon press, Oxford (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grönqvist, R., Hirvonen, M., Tohv, A.: Evaluation of three portable floor slipperiness testers. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 25, 85–95 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, K.W., Chang, W.R., Leamon, T.B., Chen, C.J.: Floor slipperiness measurement: friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditions. Saf. Sci. 42, 547–565 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, K.W., Chen, C.J.: Effects of tread groove orientation and width of the footwear pads on measured friction coefficients. Saf. Sci. 43, 391–405 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, K.W., Chen, C.C., Liu, L., Chen, C.Y.: Comparison of three floor friction measurement devices. J. Labor Occup. Saf. Health 21, 451–463 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leclercq, S., Tisserand, M., Saulnier, H.: Tribological concepts involved in slipping accidents analysis. Ergonomics 38, 197–208 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grönqvist, R.: Mechanisms of friction and assessment of slip resistance of new and used footwear soles on contaminated floors. Ergonomics 38, 224–241 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, I.J., Smith, R.: Observation of the floor surface topography changes in pedestrian slip resistance measurements. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 26, 581–601 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson, M.P.: Development of SATRA slip test and tread pattern design, guidelines. In: Slips, Stumloles, and Falls: Pedestrian Footwear and Surface, vol. 1103, pp. 113–123. ASTM special technical publication, Philadelphia (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. American Society for Testing and Materials, F-1679-04, Standard method of Using a Variable Incidence Tribometer (VIT) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Proctor, T.D., Coleman, V.: Slipping and tripping accidents and falling accidents in great Britain present and future. J. Occup. Accid. 9, 268–285 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang, W.R.: The effects of surface roughness and contaminants on the dynamic friction between porcelain tile and vulcanized rubber. Saf. Sci. 40, 577 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. William, E.: Pedestrian Slip Resistance, 2nd edn. Rose Printing Company Inc., New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grönqvist, R., Roine, J., Korhonen, E., Rahikainen, A.: Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships. J. Occup. Accid. 13(4), 291–302 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, K.W., Chen, C.J.: The effect of shoe soling tread groove width on the coefficient of friction with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants. Appl. Ergon. 35, 499–507 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, K.W., Wu, H.H., Lin, Y.C.: The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different tread groove widths, floors and contaminants. Appl. Ergon. 37, 743–748 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the National Science Council of the Republic of China under the grant MOST-103-2221-E-266-001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-Xuan Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, CC., Chen, ZX., Chang, CL., Lin, FL., Liu, L. (2016). Measuring the Influences of Footwear Shape and Area on the Coefficient of Friction by English XL. In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41694-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41694-6_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41693-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41694-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics