Skip to main content

Assessing Truck Drivers’ and Fleet Managers’ Opinions Towards Highly Automated Driving

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 484))

Abstract

Highly automated driving is on the advance and is linked to various benefits such as increased overall comfort for the driver as well as rising fuel and transport efficiency. Especially within the domain of truck driving in terms of long distance haulage, it seems as if highly automated driving systems could positively enhance the conditions for drivers and transport companies. Literature suggests that the acceptance of new technologies is a major determinant of whether a developing technology is used. This paper describes an approach aimed at assessing truck drivers’ attitudes towards highly automated driving. Furthermore, fleet managers’ opinions regarding the potential and limitations of highly automated driving systems were queried to investigate whether transport companies would invest in this new technology. Data was collected by an online and paper-based questionnaire. The results reflect the major areas of acceptance and doubts towards highly automated driving from the drivers’ as well as the fleet managers’ perspectives. Both groups are found to be the most concerned about legal liability issues and the general safety and reliability of such technology. Comfort and safety seem to have the biggest influence on the acceptance of highly automated driving. Truck drivers were concerned about reduced driving pleasure as well as being redundant. Results show that the majority of truck drivers do not have a clear idea of highly automated systems. In contrast, fleet managers claim to have an idea of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ribeiro, S.K., Kobayashi, S., Beuthe, M., Gasca, J., Greene, D., Lee, D. S., Wit, R.: Transportation and its infrastructure. Institute of Transportation Studies (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gasser, T.M., Arzt, C., Ayoubi, M., Bartels, A., Bürkle, L., Eier, J., Lotz, C.: Rechtsfolgen zunehmender Fahrzeugautomatisierung, p. 83. Unterreihe Fahrzeugtechnik, Berichte der Bundesanstalt Für Strassenwesen (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, J.M., Nidhi, K., Stanley, K.D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., Oluwatola, O.A.: Autonomous vehicle technology: a guide for policymakers. Rand Corporation (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Howard, D., Dai, D.: Public perceptions of self-driving cars: the case of Berkeley, California. In: Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting TRB, Washington, DC (2014) http://www.danielledai.com/academic/howard-dai-selfdrivingcars.pdf

  5. Kauer-Franz, M., Franz, B., Abendroth, B.: Akzeptanz teilautomatisierter Fahrzeugführung. Erkenntnisse aus sieben Jahren Forschung. Institut für Arbeitswissenschaft, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Rollen, Aufgaben, Emotionen (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C., Carsten, O.: Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 54(5), 762–771 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Winter, J.C., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A.: Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. TransP. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27, 196–217 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis Jr, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results, Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karrer, K., Glaser, C., Clemens, C., Bruder, C.: Technikaffinität erfassen – der Fragebogen TA-EG. Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme 8, 196–201 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoogendoorn, R., van Arem, B., Happee, R., Espinoza, M.M., Kotiadis, D.: Towards safe and efficient driving through vehicle automation: the Dutch automated vehicle initiative (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., De Winter, J.C.F.: Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 32, 127–140 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmitz, C.: LimeSurvey: an open source survey tool. LimeSurvey Project Hamburg, Germany (2012) http://www.limesurvey.org

  13. IBM Corp. Released.: IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Casley, S.V., Jardim, A.S., Quartulli, A.M.: A study of public acceptance of autonomous cars (Bachelor of Science), Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA (2013) http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-043013-155601/unrestricted/A_Study_of_Public_Acceptance_of_Autonomous_Cars.pdf

  15. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B.: Studying online social networks. In: Jones, S. (ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 75–105. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Hudson, J.M., Bruckman, A.: “Go away”: participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research. Inf. Soc. 20(2), 127–139 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.: Electronic survey methodology: a case study in reaching hard-to-involve internet users. Int. J. Hum Comput. Inter. 16(2), 185–210 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stanton, J.M.: An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Pers. Psychol. 51(3), 709–725 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ackroyd, S.: Data collection in context. Longman Group United Kingdom (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Natalie Richardson was the initiator of the idea of this article and contributed to development of the questionnaire. Fabian Doubek, Kevin Kuhn and Annika Stumpf contributed to the development and to data collection. Markus Lienkamp revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. He gave final approval of the version to be published and agrees with all aspects of the work. The research was conducted with basic research funds of the Institute of Automotive Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie Richardson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Richardson, N., Doubek, F., Kuhn, K., Stumpf, A. (2017). Assessing Truck Drivers’ and Fleet Managers’ Opinions Towards Highly Automated Driving. In: Stanton, N., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41681-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41682-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics