Skip to main content

The Command Team Experimental Test-Bed Phase Two: Assessing Cognitive Load and Situation Awareness in a Submarine Control Room

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 484))

Abstract

The Command Team Experimental Test-Bed (ComTET) is a body of work examining the functionality of submarine command teams with an emphasis upon future ways of working. 10 teams of 8 participants (80 participants in total) received extensive training at one of the operator stations in the submarine control room simulator (e.g. sonar or periscope operator). The teams then completed 3 different scenarios under higher and lower work demand conditions. The Work Load (WL) and Situation Awareness (SA) of the command team was assessed using a variety of standardized subjective rating scales (e.g. NASA TLX), physiological measures (e.g. ECG), in play cognitive capacity assessments (e.g. duel task paradigm) and SA assessments. The communication(s) between all team members were recorded allowing the use of the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork (EAST) method to examine performance. Preliminary results indicate that the WL of operators in a submarine command team varied as a result of scenario type and scenario demand. The initial results are discussed alongside future analysis plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stanton, N.A.: Representing distributed cognition in complex systems: how a submarine returns to periscope depth. Ergonomics 57(3), 403–418 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts, A., Stanton, N., Fay, D.: The command team experimental test-bed stage 1: design and build of a submarine command room simulator. Procedia Manufact. 3, 2800–2807 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dominguez, C., Long, W.G., Miller, T.E., Wiggins, S.L.: Design directions for support of submarine commanding officer decision making. In: Proceedings of 2006 Undersea HSI Symposium: Research, Acquisition and the Warrior, pp. 6–8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beevis, D., Vallerand, A., Greenley, M.: Technologies for workload and crewing reduction (No. DCIEM-TR-2001-109). Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Downsview, Ontario (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mansell, T., Tynan, A., Kershaw, D.: Investigating The Network Enabled Conventional Submarine: An Australian Perspective. Undersea Defence Technology (UDT) Pacific (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chalmers, B.: A work-centred approach to optimizing human-system integration in command and control for the VICTORIA class submarine, In: Proceedings of Undersea Human Systems Integration Symposium 2010, American Society of Naval Engineers (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shattuck, L.G., Miller, N.L.: Extending naturalistic decision making to complex organizations: a dynamic model of situated cognition. Organ. Stud. 27(7), 989–1009 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirschenbaum, S.S.: Analysing submarine decision making: a question of levels. In: Salas, E., Klein, G.A. (eds.) Linking Expertise and Naturalistic Decision Making. Psychology Press, Abingdon, pp 189–207 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loft, S., Morrell, D.B., Huf, S.: Using the situation present assessment method to measure situation awareness in simulated submarine track management. Int. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. 2(1), 33–48 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baddeley, A.: The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(11), 417–423

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hutchins, E.: Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H.: Let the reader decide: a paradigm shift for situation awareness in sociotechnical systems. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Making 9(1), 44–50 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mueller, S.T.: A partial implementation of the BICA cognitive decathlon using the psychology experiment building language (PEBL). Int. J. Mach. Conscious. 2(2), 273–288A, 2000 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Roberts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roberts, A., Stanton, N.A., Fay, D. (2017). The Command Team Experimental Test-Bed Phase Two: Assessing Cognitive Load and Situation Awareness in a Submarine Control Room. In: Stanton, N., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41681-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41682-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics