Skip to main content

FRAM in FSA—Introducing a Function-Based Approach to the Formal Safety Assessment Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 484))

Abstract

Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) is a structured methodology in maritime safety rule making processes. FSA takes organizational, technical and human-related factors into concern. While the method allows for the use of expert input during the identification of hazards and risk control options, the FSA guidelines give preference to assessment methods grounded in quantitative risk assessment. No specific guidance is given on how expert input should be obtained. This article therefore presents the findings of a pilot study with the objective to introduce the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) as a method to enrich FSA studies through structured expert input. Two focus groups (n = 6) were conducted to compare hazards and risk control options identified in one scenario with the help of fault tree analysis and FRAM. The results of the study show that FRAM has the potential to enrich hazard identification as a complementary tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IMO: Revised guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. IMO document MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12. International Maritime Organization (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Soares, C.G., Teixeira, A.P.: Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 74, 299–309 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sames, P.C.: Introduction to risk-based approaches in the maritime industry. In: Papanikolaou, A.D. (ed.) Risk-Based Ship Design. Methods, Tools and Application, pp. 1–15. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kontovas, C.A., Psaraftis, H.N.: Formal safety assessment: a critical review. Mar. Technol 46, 45–59 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U.: Human and organizational factors in the maritime world—are we keeping up to speed? WMU J. Marittime Aff. 9(1), 1–3 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U., Baldauf, M., Ghirxi, K.T.: Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 47(10), 1187–1196 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The Four Basic Principles of the FRAM. http://functionalresonance.com/basic-principles.html

  8. Herrera, I.A., Woltjer, R.: Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 1269–1275 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollnagel, E.: FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method—Modelling Complex Socio-Technical Systems. Ashgate Publishing Company, Farnham (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hollnagel, E., Hounsgaard, J., Colligan, L.: FRAM—The Functional Resonance Analysis Method—A Handbook for the Practical Use of the Method. Centre for Quality, Middelfart (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Woods, D.: Essential characteristics of resilience. In: Hollnagel, E., Woods, D., Leveson, N. (eds.) Resilience Engineering: Precepts and Concepts, pp. 21–34. Ashgate Publishing Group, Farnham (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U., Graziano, A., Kataria, A., Praetorius, G.: TRACEr-MAR—guidebook for the technique for the retrospective & predictive analysis of cognitive errors adapted to the MARitime domain. MaRiSa Occasional Paper no. 2. WMU (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kataria, A., Praetorius, G., Schröder-Hinrichs, J.U., Graziano, A., Teixeira, A.P., Soares, C.G., Golyshev, P., Kähler, N., Ventikos, N., Lykos, G.V., Sotiralis, P., Hüffmeier, J., Fälth, J., Ljungkvist, M.: Deliverable 1.1 results of accident and incident analysis (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuniavsky, M.: Observing the User Experience. A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Psaraftis, H.N.: Formal safety assessment: an updated review. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 17, 390–402 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gesa Praetorius .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Praetorius, G., Graziano, A., Schröder-Hinrichs, JU., Baldauf, M. (2017). FRAM in FSA—Introducing a Function-Based Approach to the Formal Safety Assessment Framework. In: Stanton, N., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41681-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41682-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics