Abstract
Mutual influence of ICAO flight safety main concept components is grounded from the perspective of main factor—“aviation personnel attitude to safe actions and conditions” taking into account influence of human factor on flight safety. This attitude is found with help of building and analysis of estimate usefulness functions for continuums of aircraft flight norms based on air traffic controllers solutions of closed decision taking tasks. Herewith main solution taking dominant that defines air traffic controller attitude to flight level norms violation (tending, indifferent, non-tending to risk) is commonly found with help of “risk premium” criterion that involves only one point of estimate usefulness function. Improved criterion that includes in calculation all characteristic points of usefulness function is proposed. It was found that under these circumstances efficiency of main solution taking dominant determination is increased in 20 %.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Edwards, W.: Solution taking/human factor. In: Activity Modeling, Professional Education and Operators Selection. Part I—Psychological Activity Models, vol. 3–6. Mir, Moscow (1991)
Reva, A.N., Tymishev, K.M., Bekmuhambetov, A.A.: Human Factor and Flight Safety: (Proactive Research of Influences): Monograph. Almaty (2006)
Karapetyan, G.S., Mihaylik, N.F., Pichko, S.P., Prokofyev, A.I.: Unfavorable Events Caused by Crew Action Inflight Provision. Mir, Moscow (1989)
Human Factors Digest No 11.: Human Factors in CNS/ATM Systems. Circular 249-AN/149. ICAO, Montreal (1994)
Doc 9806 AN/763.: Human Factors Guidelines for Safety Audits Manual. ICAO, Montreal (2002)
Leychenko, S.D., Malyshevsky, A.V., Mihaylik, M.F.: Human Factor in Aviation: Monograph in Two Books. SPb, Kirovohrad (2006)
Doc 9859 AN/474 ICAO.: Safety Management Manual (SMM). ICAO, Montreal (2013)
Reva, O.M.: Human factor: paradox of pilot activity psychological dominant in stochastic risk conditions. Airnavigation Problems, vol. 3, pp. 40–49 (1997)
Bekmuhambetov, A.A.: Operator Activity Improvement on the Basis of Risk Control Theory and Practice During Flight Safety Provision. SPb (2005)
Muhtarov, P.S.: Main dominants in air traffic controller solution taking at estimating usefulness-safety of flight air space level norm. In: Aviation-space Technique and Technology, vol. 116, pp. 143–150 (2014)
Reva, O.M., Muhtarov, P.S., Mirzoev, B.M.: Main solution taking dominant stability in conditions of risk. In: Aviation-Space Technique and Technology, vol. 117, pp. 147–153 (2014)
Borsuk, S.P.: Air traffic controllers main behavior dominant determination in conditions of flight level norm violation. In: Science-Based Technologies, vol. 27, pp. 261–265 (2015)
Kini, R.L., Raypha, H.: Taking Solutions at Many Preferences and Substitution Criteria. Radio I svyaz, Moscow (1981)
Reliability and efficiency in technique. In: Handbook in 10 volumes. Efficiency of Technical Systems, vol. 3. Mashinostroenie, Moscow, (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Reva, O., Borsuk, S., Mushgyul-Ogli, B.M., Shirin-Ogli, P.M. (2017). New Approach to Determination of Main Solution Taking Dominant of Air Traffic Controller During Flight Level Norms Violation. In: Stanton, N., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41681-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41682-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)