Abstract
The majority of published research about EMR systems regarding nurses and their clinical tasks have centered on their attitudes toward EMR systems, which have generally been positive and accepting. There is a lack of studies that would consider dimensions of clinical tasks, human factors, and available equipment to determine how nurses work with EMRs. The goal of this study was to investigate how suitable the design of computer workstations is in terms of hardware selection for nurses’ work content. This was a mixed-method study (focus groups and online survey) to collect data. The survey tool was distributed among 600 nurses in a rural hospital and a series of two-way, three-way chi-square and logistic regression analysis were conducted to investigate the correlation between the human factors aspects of the clinical tasks (work content) and nurses’ preference of computing device and location. The findings from 61 responses illustrated a significant correlation between cognitive and interaction design aspects and the preferred type of computer workstations. This means that better understanding of cognitive and interaction design aspects of clinical tasks by nurses as well as managers and computer software developers is critical in workstation design, resource allocation, better quality of care and patient safety.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chan, M.F.: Investigating nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills patterns towards clinical management system: results of a cluster analysis. Med. Inf. Internet Med. 31(3), 161–174 (2006)
Huryk, L.A.: Factors influencing nurses’ attitudes towards healthcare information technology. J. Nurs. Manag. 18, 606–612 (2010)
Chow, S.K.Y., Chin, W.Y., Lee, H.Y., Leung, H.C., Tang, F.H.: Nurses’ perceptions and attitudes towards computerisation in a private hospital. J. Clin. Nurs. 21, 1685–1696 (2011)
Top, M., Gider, Ö.: Nurses’ views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction. J Med Syst. 36, 1979–1988 (2012)
Andersen, P., Lindgaard, A.M., Prgomet, M., Creswick, N., Westbrook, J.I.: Mobile and fixed computer use by doctors and nurses on hospital wards: multi-method study on the relationships between clinician role, clinical task, and device choice. J. Med. Internet Res. 11(3), e32 (2009)
Buchauer, A., Pohl, U., Kurzel, N., Haux, R.: Mobilizing a health professional’s workstation—results of an evaluation study. Int. J. Med. Inf. 54, 105–114 (1999)
Bragadóttir, H., Gunnarsdóttir, S., Ingason, H.T.: The development and piloting of electronic standardized measures on nursing work: combining engineering and nursing knowledge. J. Nurs. Manag. 21, 679–689 (2013)
Carayon, P., Wetterneck, T.B., Rivera-Rodriguez, A.J., Hundt, A.S., Hoonakker, P., Holden, R., Gurses, A.P.: Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Appl. Ergon. 45, 14–25 (2013)
Holden, R.J., Carayon, P., Gurses, A.P., Hoonakker, P., Hundt, A.S., Ozok, A.A., Rivera-Rodriguez, A.J.: SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics 56(11), 1669–1686 (2013)
McGinn, C.A., Grenier, S., Duplantie, J., Shaw, N., Sicotte, C., Mathieu, L., Leduc, Y., Légaré, F., Gagnon, M.P.: Comparison of user groups’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Med. 9, 46 (2011)
Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R.: Work redesign. Addision-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA (1980)
McCormick, E.J.: Job analysis: methods and applications. AMACOM, A Division of American Management Association, New York, NY (1979)
Ammenwerth, E., Mansmann, U., Iller, C., Eichstädter, R.: Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 10(1), 69–84 (2003)
Top, M., Yilmaz, A., Gider, Ö.: Electronic medical records (EMR) and nurses in Turkish hospitals. Syst. Pract. Act Res. 26(3), 281–297 (2013)
Likourezos, A., Chalfin, D.B., Murphy, D.G., Sommer, B., Darcy, K., Davidson, S.J.: Physician and nurses satisfaction with electronic medical record system. J. Emerg. Med. 27(4), 419–424 (2004)
Oroviogoicoechea, C., Watson, R., Beortegui, E., Remirez, S.: Nurses’ perception of the use of computerised information systems in practice: questionnaire development. J. Clin. Nurs. 19, 240–248 (2010)
Lærum, H., Faxvaag, A.: Task-oriented evaluation of electronic medical records systems: development and validation of a questionnaire for physicians. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 4(1) (2004)
Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., Morton, S.C., Shekelle, P.G.: Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 144(10), 742–752 (2006)
Koivunen, M., Kontio, R., Pitkänen, A., Katajisto, J., Välimäki, M.: Occupational stress and implementation of information technology among nurses working on acute psychiatric wards. Perspect. Psychiatry C 49, 41–49 (2013)
Carayon, P., Alvarado, C.J., Hundt, A.S.: Work design and patient safety. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 8(5), 395–428 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Moayed, F.A., Savoy, A., Turpen, C. (2017). Study of Suitability of Computer Workstations Design for Nurses’ Work Content. In: Duffy, V., Lightner, N. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 482. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41652-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41652-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41651-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41652-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)