Skip to main content

The Preference of Using Social Media by Different Attachment Styles for Managing Romantic Relation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Cross-Cultural Decision Making

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 480))

  • 1136 Accesses

Abstract

This research is mainly focus on the discussion of the user experience and preference for college students with their romantic relation partner. Nowadays, people always use social media to contact with other people, especially their romantic partner. Couples use social media to chat every moment when they miss their lover and also share their life by sending photos. By attachment theory, there are four different attachment styles. Each attachment style is measured by avoidance and anxiety. Previous studies have investigated the effect of attachment theory in romantic relation. However, seldom studies discuss the use of social media between romantic partners. We want to know that whether the social media used by different attachment style people would influence the satisfaction of love or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bowlby, J.: Attachment and Loss: Attachment. Basic Books (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowlby, J.: Attachment and Loss, vol. 3. Basic books (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartholomew, Kim, Horowitz, Leonard M.: Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61(2), 226 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hazan, Cindy, Shaver, Phillip: Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52(3), 511 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davila, J., et al.: Romantic involvement and depressive symptoms in early and late adolescence: the role of a preoccupied relational style. Pers. Relat 11(2), 161–178 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shorey, Ryan C., Cornelius, Tara L., Bell, Kathryn M.: Behavioral theory and dating violence: a framework for prevention programming. J. Behav. Anal. Offender Victim Treat. Prev. 1(4), 1 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox, J., Katie, M.W.: Social networking sites in romantic relationships: attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on Facebook. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 17(1), 3–7 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hand, M.M. et al.: Facebook and romantic relationships: intimacy and couple satisfaction associated with online social network use. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 16(1), 8–13 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Chien Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lin, WC., Hsu, YC. (2017). The Preference of Using Social Media by Different Attachment Styles for Managing Romantic Relation. In: Schatz, S., Hoffman, M. (eds) Advances in Cross-Cultural Decision Making. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 480. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41636-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41636-6_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41635-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41636-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics