Skip to main content

An Integrated Computational Simulation System for Injury Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Applied Digital Human Modeling and Simulation

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 481))

Abstract

Injury prediction and prevention are subject areas that will significantly benefit from the use of digital human models (DHMs). The subject of this research is to investigate human simulation to predict injuries. This work over the past few years seeks to integrate high-fidelity computational methods for stress/strain analysis, namely finite element analysis (FEA) with biomechanics predictions through DHMS to yield measures (indices) for the propensity for injury. Indeed, a multi-scale FEA model using continuum-mechanics-based theories was developed in order to obtain highly accurate simulations of the segmental stress fields during a specific task. Previous work by this group is a simulation environment called Santos™ that enables the prediction of human motion including all aspects of its biomechanics. The Santos environment provides a joint- on physics-based, predictive capability including a muscle model. While FEA models are certainly useful as independent tools, their benefits can be fully realized when they are integrated with a complete system-level human model. This integration essentially connects the local model to a virtual environment, whereby the DHM model yields the muscle forces and motion profiles (i.e., the kinematics of the motion across time for each degree-of-freedom for the body). These motion profiles and muscle forces are calculated for each task and are used as input for the multi-scale FEA model. The results of the FEA model executed across a statistically viable set of data is fed into a neural network for learning and evaluating a pre-determined injury index measure that was developed by this group. This paper presents the initial promising results for this integrated multi-scale approach to quantify and predict injury in a particular joint that is undergoing a specific motion. The joint injury index system is developed based on the yield stress of the joint components. The injury index includes both the bone and soft tissue structures of the joint where bone was modeled as elastic material and the soft tissue was modeled as hyper-elastic material with the Noe-Hookean method. This integrated system allows one to study the effects of various motions and task-parameters on knee joints so as to modify tasks, save analysis time, and reduce the likelihood of injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Renstrom, P.A.F.H., Konradsen, L.: Ankle ligament injuries. Br. J. Sports Med. 31(1), 1–20 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sultan, S., Marler, R.T.: Multi-scale predictive human model for preventing injuries in the ankle and knee. In: 6th International Conference on Applied Digital Human Modeling, July, Los Vegas (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruscio, B.A., Jones, B.H., Bullock, S.H., Burnham, B.R., Canham-Chervak, M., Rennix, C.P., Wells, T.S., Smith, J.W.: A process to identify military injury prevention priorities based on injury type and limited duty days. Am. J. Prev. Med. 38, S19–S33 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zambraski, E.J., Yancosek, K.E.: Prevention and rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Injuries during military operations an training. J. Strength Conditioning Res. (2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association), 26(7), 101 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hauret, K.G., Bruce H., Jones, B.H., Bullock, S.H., Canham-Chervak, M., Canada, S.: Musculoskeletal Injuries Description of an Under-Recognized Injury Problem Among Military Personnel. US Army Report (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danny, L.T., Hollingsworth, J.: The prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal injuries during a pre-deployment workup cycle: survey of a Marine Corps special operations company. J Spec. Oper. Med. 9(4), 11–15 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Army Report TB MED 592: Prevention and control of musculoskeletal injuries associated with physical training. Technical Bulletin, May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sultan, S., Marler, R.T.: Multi-scale human modeling for injury prevention. In: 2nd International Conference on Applied Digital Human Modeling, July, San Francisco (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abdel-Malek, K., Yang, J., Kim, J., Marler, R.T., Beck, S., Nebel, K.: Santos: a virtual human environment for human factors assessment. In: 24th Army Science Conference, November, FL, Assistant Secretary of the Army (Research, Development and Acquisition), Department of the Army, Washington, DC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denavit, J., Hartenberg, R.S.: A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. J. Appl. Mech. 77, 215–221 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Q., Marler, T., Yang, J., Kim, J., Harrison, C.: Posture prediction with external loads—a pilot study. In: SAE 2009 World Congress, April, Detroit, MI, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marler, T., Knake, L., Johnson, R.: Optimization-based posture prediction for analysis of box-lifting tasks. In: 3rd International Conference on Digital Human Modeling, July, Orlando, FL (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marler, R.T.: A study of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering applications. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kubíček, M., Florian, Z.: Stress and strain analysis of the knee joint. In: Engineering MECHANICS, vol. 16(5), pp. 315–322 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Department of Orthopaedics at the University of Iowa and in particular Dr. Donald D. Anderson, the director of the Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, for providing us the knee joint data. We also thank Dr. Mohammad Bataineh for use of the NNT program that he developed in the VSR laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sultan Sultan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

For the ankle joint, the compression (A comp ) and shear (A shear ) forces are computed as shown in the following equations [8]:

$$ \begin{aligned} A_{comp} & = f_{c - sol} + f_{c - medgas} + f_{c - tibant} + f_{c - tibpost} + GRF_{z} \cos (\theta_{ankle} ) \\ & \quad - GRF_{y} { \sin }\left( {\theta_{ankle} } \right) - mg_{foot} \cos \left( {\theta_{ankle} } \right) \\ A_{shear} & = f_{s - sol} + f_{s - medgas} + f_{s - tibant} + f_{s - tibpost} + GRF_{z} \sin (\theta_{ankle} ) \\ & \quad - GRF_{y} { \cos }\left( {\theta_{ankle} } \right) - mg_{foot} \sin \left( {\theta_{ankle} } \right) \\ \end{aligned} $$

For the knee joint, the muscle compression (M comp ) and muscle shear (M shear ) forces are computed as shown in the following equations:

$$ \begin{aligned} M_{comp} & = f_{{c{-}recfem}} + f_{c - vasint} + f_{c - sar} + f_{c - tfl} + f_{c - bifemlh} \\ & \quad + f_{c - bifemsh} + f_{c - grac} - mg_{tibia} \cos \left( \lambda \right) \\ M_{shear} & = f_{s - recfem} + f_{s - vasint} + f_{s - sar} + f_{s - tfl} + f_{s - bifemlh} \\ & \quad + f_{s - bifemsh} + f_{s - grac} - mg_{tibia} \sin \left( \lambda \right) \\ \end{aligned} $$

where \( f_{{c{-}sol}} ,f_{{c{-}medgas}} ,f_{{c{-} tibant}} ,f_{{c{-} tibpost}} \) are the compression components of the ankle muscles, \( f_{s - sol} ,f_{s - medgas} ,f_{s - tibant } ,f_{s - tibpost} \) are the shear components of the ankle muscles, \( f_{c - recfem} ,f_{c - vasint} ,f_{c - sar} ,f_{c - tfl} ,f_{c - bifemlh} ,f_{c - bifemsh} ,f_{c - grac} \) are the compression components of the knee muscles, and \( mg_{tibia} , mg_{foot} \) are the shin and foot weight, respectively.

\( f_{s - recfem } , f_{s - vasint} , f_{s - sar} , f_{s - tfl } , f_{s - bifemlh} , f_{s - bifemsh} , f_{s - grac} \) are the shear components of knee muscles, \( GRF_{z} ,GRF_{y} \) are the z and y components of the ground reaction force, and \( \lambda , \theta_{ankle} \) are the knee and ankle angles, respectively (Fig. 8 and Table 1).

Fig. 8
figure 8

a Muscle force analysis [2, 8], b injury prediction algorithm [2, 8]

Table 1 RMSE and MAE values for right knee walking and stair ascending

Appendix 2

See Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Injury index for knee joint components at 17 kg backpack loading
Table 3 Comparison of injury index at different loadings for tibia bone and lateral meniscus in walking

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sultan, S., Abdel-Malek, K., Arora, J., Bhatt, R., Marler, T. (2017). An Integrated Computational Simulation System for Injury Assessment. In: Duffy, V. (eds) Advances in Applied Digital Human Modeling and Simulation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 481. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41627-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41627-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41626-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41627-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics