Abstract
A new framework for extending Statistical Process Monitoring (SPM) to simultaneous False Alarm Rejection and Fault Identification (FARFI) is presented in this paper. This is motivated by the possibly large negative impact on product quality, process safety, and profitability resulting from incorrect control actions induced by false alarms—especially for batch processes. The presented FARFI approach adapts the classification model already used for fault identification to simultaneously perform false alarm rejection by adding normal operation as an extra data class. As no additional models are introduced, the complexity of the overall SPM system is not increased.
Two case studies demonstrate the large potential of the FARFI approach. The best models reject more than \(94\,\%\) of the false alarms while their fault identification accuracy (\(>95\,\%\)) is not impacted. However, results also indicate that not all classifier types perform equally well. Care should be taken to employ models that can deal with the added classification challenges originating from the introduction of the false alarm class.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Venkatasubramanian, V., Rengaswamy, R., Yin, K., Kavuri, S.: A review of process fault detection and diagnosis–part I: quantitative model-based methods. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27, 293–311 (2003)
Ge, Z., Song, Z., Gao, F.: Review of recent research on data-based process monitoring. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 3543–3562 (2013)
Qin, S.: Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis. Ann. Rev. Control 26, 220–234 (2012)
Van Impe, J.F.M., Gins, G.: An extensive reference dataset for fault detection and identification in batch processes. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 148, 20–31 (2015)
Ding, S.: Data-driven design of monitoring and diagnosis systems for dynamic processes: a review of subspace technique based schemes and some recent results. J. Process Control 24, 431–449 (2014)
Yoon, S., MacGregor, J.: Statistical and causal model-based approaches to fault detection and isolation. AIChE J. 46, 1813–1824 (2000)
Aldrich, C., Auret, L.: Unsupervised Process Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis with Machine Learning Methods. Springer, London (2013)
Hwang, I., Kim, S.: A survey of fault detection, isolation, and reconfiguration methods. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 18, 636–653 (2010)
Kourti, T.: Application of latent variable methods to process control and multivariate statistical process control in industry. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 19, 213–246 (2005)
Kourti, T.: The process analytical technology initiative and multivariate process analysis, monitoring and control. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 384, 1043–1048 (2006)
MacGregor, J., Cinar, A.: Monitoring, fault diagnosis, fault-tolerant control and optimization: data driven methods. Comput. Chem. Eng. 47, 111–120 (2012)
MacGregor, J., Kourti, T.: Statistical process control of multivariate processes. Control Eng. Pract. 3(3), 403–414 (1995)
Bishop, C.: Neural Networks Pattern Recogn. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1995)
Hsieh, W.W., Cannon, A.J.: Towards robust nonlinear multivariate analysis by neural network methods. In: Donner, R.V., Barbosa, S.M. (eds.) Nonlinear Time Series Analysis in the Geosciences. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, pp. 97–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Van Impe, J.F.M., Augustinus, K., De Prins, M., Gins, G.: Advance warning for loss of separation in an industrial distillation column (2016). Submitted
Jolliffe, I.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer, New York (1986)
Chen, J., Liu, K.: On-line batch process monitoring using dynamic PCA and dynamic PLS models. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57, 63–75 (2002)
Choi, S., Morris, J., Lee, I.B.: Dynamic model-based batch process monitoring. Chem. Eng. Sci. 63, 622–636 (2008)
Lee, J., Yoo, C., Choi, S., Vanrolleghem, P., Lee, I.B.: Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59, 223–234 (2004)
Lee, J., Yoo, C., Lee, I.B.: Statistical monitoring of dynamic processes based on dynamic independent component analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59, 2995–3006 (2004)
Wang, L., Shi, H.: Multivariate statistical process monitoring using an improved independent component analysis. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 88, 403–414 (2010)
Gins, G., Van den Kerkhof, P., Vanlaer, J., Van Impe, J.F.M.: Improving classification-based iagnosis of batch processes through data selection and appropriate pretreatment. J. Process Control 26, 90–101 (2015)
Nomikos, P., MacGregor, J.F.: Monitoring batch processes using multiway principal component analysis. AIChE J. 40, 1361–1375 (1994)
Wold, S., Kettaneh, N., Friden, H., Holmberg, A.: Modelling and diagnosis of batch processes and analogous kinetic experiments. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 44, 331–340 (1998)
Li, B., Morris, J., Martin, E.: Model selection for partial least squares regression. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 64, 79–89 (2002)
Alcala, C., Qin, S.J.: Analysis and generalization of fault diagnosis methods for process monitoring. J. Process Control 21, 322–330 (2011)
Bodesheim, P., Freytag, A., Rodner, E., Denzler, J.: Local novelty detection in multi-class recognition problems. In: Proceedings of the 2015 WACV Conference, pp. 813–820 (2015)
King, R., Feng, C., Sutherland, A.: StatLog: a comparison of classification algorithms on large real-world problems. Appl. Artif. Intell. 9(3), 289–333 (1995)
Wu, X., Kumar, V., Quinlan, J., Ghosh, J., Yang, Q., Motoda, H., McLachlan, G., Ng, A., Liu, B., Yu, P., Zhou, Z., Steinbach, M., Hand, D., Steinberg, D.: Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 14(1), 1–37 (2008)
Abe, S.: Support Vector Machines for Pattern Classification. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Fix, E., Hodges, J.: Discriminatory analysis, nonparametric discrimination: consistency properties USAF school of aviation medicine, Randolph Field (TX, USA), Technical Report 4 (1951)
Suykens, J., Van Gestel, T., De Brabanter, J.: Least Squares Support Vector Machines. World Scientific, Singapore (2002)
Aizerman, M.A., Braverman, E.A., Rozonoer, L.: Theoretical foundations of the potential function method in pattern recognition learning. Autom. Remote Control 25, 821–837 (1964)
Birol, G., Undey, C., Cinar, A.: A modular simulation package for fed-batch fermentation: penicillin production. Comput. Chem. Eng. 26, 1553–1565 (2002)
Gins, G., Vanlaer, J., Van den Kerkhof, P., Van Impe, J.F.M.: The RAYMOND simulation package - generating RAYpresentative MONitoring Data to design advanced process monitoring and control algorithms. Comput. Chem. Eng. 69, 108–118 (2014)
Van den Kerkhof, P., Vanlaer, J., Gins, G., Van Impe, J.F.M.: Analysis of smearing-out in contribution plot based fault isolation for statistical process control. Chem. Eng. Sci. 104, 285–293 (2013)
Westerhuis, J.A., Gurden, S.P., Smilde, A.K.: Generalized contribution plots in multivariate statistical process monitoring. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 51, 95–114 (2000)
Wuyts, S., Gins, G., Van den Kerkhof, P., Van Impe, J.M.F.: Fault identification in batch processes using process data or contribution plots: a comparative study. Adv. Control Chem. Process. 8, 1283–1288 (2015)
Acknowledgements
Work supported in part by Project PFV/10/002 (OPTEC Optimization in Engineering Center) of the Research Council of the KUÂ Leuven and Project IAP VII/19 (DYSCO Dynamical Systems, Control and Optimization) of the Belgian Program on Interuniversity Poles of Attraction initiated by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office. The authors assume scientific responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gins, G., Wuyts, S., Van den Zegel, S., Van Impe, J. (2016). Extending Process Monitoring to Simultaneous False Alarm Rejection and Fault Identification (FARFI). In: Perner, P. (eds) Advances in Data Mining. Applications and Theoretical Aspects. ICDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9728. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41561-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41561-1_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41560-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41561-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)