Skip to main content

Similar Image Retrieval of Breast Masses on Ultrasonography Using Subjective Data and Multidimensional Scaling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9699))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Presentation of images similar to a new unknown lesion can be helpful in medical image diagnosis and treatment planning. We have been investigating a method to retrieve relevant images as a diagnostic reference for breast masses on mammograms and ultrasound images. For retrieval of visually similar images, subjective similarities for pairs of masses were determined by experienced radiologists, and objective similarity measures were computed by modeling the subjective similarity space using multidimensional scaling (MDS). In this study, we investigated the similarity measure for masses on breast ultrasound images based on MDS and an artificial neural network and examined its usefulness in image retrieval. For 666 pairs of masses, correlation coefficient between the average subjective similarities and the MDS-based similarity measure was 0.724. When one to five images were retrieved, average precision in selecting relevant images, i.e., pathology-matched images for benign/malignant index image, was 0.778, indicating the potential utility of the proposed MDS-based similarity measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. American Cancer Society, Atlanta (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Ervik, M., Dikshit, R., Eser, S., Mathers, C., Rebelo, M., Parkin, D.M., Forman, D., Bray, F.: GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: In: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet], International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (2013). http://globocan.iarc.fr

  3. National Cancer Center, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services: Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan MCIJ 2011. National Cancer Center (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tabar, L., Fagerberg, G., Duffy, S.W., Day, N.E., Gad, A., Grontoft, O.: Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 30, 187–210 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shapiro, S., Venet, W., Strax, P., Venet, L., Roeser, R.: Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the health insurance plan study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 67, 65–74 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Humphrey, L.L., Helfand, M., Chan, B.K.S., Woolf, S.H.: Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann. Intern. Med. 137, E-347–E-367 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berg, W.A., Zhang, Z., Lehrer, D., Jong, R.A., Pisano, E.D., Barr, R.G., Bohm-Velez, M., Mahoney, M.C., Evans III, W.P., Larsen, L.H., Morton, M.J., Mendelson, E.B., Farria, D.M., Cormack, J.B., Marques, H.S., Adams, A., Yeh, N.M., Gabrielli, G.G.: ACRIN 6666 investigators: detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307, 1394–1404 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chae, E.Y., Kim, H.H., Cha, J.H., Shin, H.J., Kim, H.: Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts. J. Ultrasound Med. 32, 1573–1578 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brem, R.F., Lenihan, M.J., Lieberman, J., Torrente, J.: Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future. AJR 204, 234–240 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohuchi, N., Suzuki, A., Sobue, T., Kawai, M., Yamamoto, S., Zhang, Y.F., Shiono, Y.N., Saito, H., Kuriyama, S., Tohno, E., Endo, T., Fukao, A., Tsuji, I., Yamaguchi, T., Ohashi, Y., Fukuda, M., Ishida, T.: J-START investigator groups: Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 387, 341–348 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muramatsu, C., Li, Q., Suzuki, K., Schmidt, R.A., Shiraishi, J., Ewstead, G.M., Doi, K.: Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: preliminary result. Med. Phys. 32, 2295–2304 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Muramatsu, C., Li, Q., Shiraishi, J., Doi, K.: Investigation of similarity measures for selection of similar images in the diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Med. Phys. 35, 5695–5702 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muramatsu, C., Schmidts, R.A., Shiraishi, J., Li, Q., Doi, K.: Presentation of similar images as a reference for distinction between benign and malignant masses on mammograms: analysis of initial observer study. J. Digit. Imaging 23, 592–602 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muramatsu, C., Nishimura, K., Endo, T., Oiwa, M., Shiraiwa, M., Doi, K., Fujita, H.: Represenattion of lesion similarity by use of multidimensional scaling for breast masses on mammograms. J. Digit. Imaging 26, 740–747 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kruskal, J.B., Wish, M.: Multidimensional Scaling. Sage Publication, Beverly Hills (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shepard, R.N., Romney, A.K., Nerlove, S.B.: Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences. Seminar Press, New York (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Muramatsu, C., Schmidt, R.A., Shiraishi, J., Endo, T., Fujita, H., Doi, K.: Usefulness of presentation of similar images in the diagnosis of breast masses on mammograms comparison of observer performances in Japan and the USA. Radiol. Phys. Technol. 6, 70–77 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Muramatsu, C., Endo, T., Oiwa, M., Shiraiwa, M., Doi, K., Fujita, H.: Effect of reference image retrieval on breast mass classification performance: ROC analysis. In: Breast Image Analysis MICCAI, pp. 50–57 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Mikinao Oiwa, MD, PhD and Misaki Shiraiwa, MD, PhD for their contribution in this study. This study was supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research for Young Scientists (no. 26860399) by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (no. 26108005) by Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sciences and Technology in Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chisako Muramatsu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muramatsu, C., Takahashi, T., Morita, T., Endo, T., Fujita, H. (2016). Similar Image Retrieval of Breast Masses on Ultrasonography Using Subjective Data and Multidimensional Scaling. In: Tingberg, A., LÃ¥ng, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics