Skip to main content

Protecting Youth from Themselves in the Media: The Right to Be Forgotten

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adolescents, Rapid Social Change, and the Law

Part of the book series: Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development ((ARAD))

  • 965 Accesses

Abstract

Advances in telecommunications have brought many changes to our daily lives, one of which is the change in the norm of privacy. With the convenience in viewing and (re)distributing contents, on top of the permanency of contents on the Internet, privacy has become more of a concern than ever. The concern is even greater for the younger generation, because they are eager to share and less sensitive to privacy. The European Union recently has recognized that people have the right to control their own information, even after they have become publicly available. The European Union commission proposed an update in the fundamental data protection regulations, including the so-called “right to be forgotten.” However, securing the right to be forgotten is not possible with a regulation set only for one region. In the United States, where the majority of companies handling online information are based, this type of right is readily rejected because it is considered to directly violate the First Amendment’s freedom of expression. This chapter considers how to balance the freedom to express and adolescents’ right to be “forgotten.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABC. (2004, January 20). TV anchor resigns over wet t-shirt video. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=128067

  • Ambrose, M. L. (2013). It’s about time: Privacy, information life cycles, and the right to be forgotten. Stanford Technology Law Reivew, 16(2), 101–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. C. (2012). The “right to be forgotten”: Reconciling EU and US perspectives. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 30(1), 161–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2007). Social network sites: Public, private, or what ? Social network sites mediated publics. Knowledge Tree, (13), 1–7. doi:10.4018/jantti.2010040104

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox Broadcasting v. Cohn. (1975). 420 U.S. 469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C., & Eynon, R. (2013). Teenagers and Technology. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. (2012). Facework on facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers and Education, 59(1), 19–29. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.007

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 95/46 EC. (1995). European communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, P. (2011). Foggy thinking about the right to oblivion. Blog de Peter Fleisher, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Star v. B.J.F. (1989). 491 U.S. 524.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. (2014). Disconnected: Youth, new media, and the ethic gap. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korenhof, P., Ausloos, J., Szekely, I., Ambrose, M. L., Sartor, G., & Leenes, R. (2014). Timing the right to be forgotten: A study into “time” as a factor in deciding about retention or erasure of data. In Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Conference 2014 (pp. 1–30).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence v. Texas. (2003). 539 U.S. 558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, Roger J. R. (2007). Adolescents, media, and the law: What developmental science reveals and free speech requires. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, Roger J. R. (2014). Childhood as a Legal Status. In G. B. Melton, A. Ben-Arieh, J. Cashmore, G. S. Goodman, & N. K. Worley (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Child Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. doi:10.1177/1461444807080335

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, B. (2015). Google to shut the door on “revenge porn.” Retrieved June 23, 2015, from http://www.cnet.com/news/google-to-shut-the-door-on-revenge-porn/

  • Prosser, W. L. (1960). Privacy. California Law Review, 48(3), 383–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J. (2012). The right to be forgotten. Stanford Law Review Online, 64, 88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co. (1979). 443 U.S. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staksrud, E. (2013). Children in the online world: Risk, regulation, rights. Farnham, England: Ashgate Publishin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (2008). Online communication and youth relationships. Future of Children, 18(1), 119–146. doi:10.1353/foc.0.0006

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, K., Smahel, D., & Greenfield, P. (2006). Connecting developmental constructions to the internet: identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 395–406. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.395

    Google Scholar 

  • Szoka, B., & Thierer, A. (2009). COPPA 2.0: The new battle over privacy, age verification, online safety & free speech. The Progress & Freedom Foundation, 16(11), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Total Number of Websites. (2015). Retrieved June 22, 2015, from http://www.internetlivestats.com/total-number-of-websites/

  • U.S. Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of Press. (1989). 489 U.S. 749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Schouten, A. P., & Peter, J. (2005). Youth’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media & Society, 7(3), 383–402. doi:10.1177/1461444805052282

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, K. (2014). 28 Internet acronyms every parent should know. Retrieved August 8, 2015, from http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/08/living/internet-acronyms-every-parent-should-know/index.html

  • Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, W. (2010, May 12). Where are they now ? The “star wars kid” sued the people who made him famous. Business Insider, p. 0. New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/where-are-they-now-the-star-wars-kid-2010-5

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun Ho Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, S.H. (2016). Protecting Youth from Themselves in the Media: The Right to Be Forgotten. In: Levesque, R. (eds) Adolescents, Rapid Social Change, and the Law. Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41535-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics