Reconciliation of Employment and Childcare in Austria, Germany and Iceland. Examples for Gender Equality in Family Life?

  • Sigrid Leitner
Chapter

Abstract

The paper starts with theoretical assumptions and empirical findings on gender equality effects of reconciliation policies. Thereafter, childcare provision and parental leave schemes in Austria, Germany and Iceland are compared. While Germany and Austria may be classified as optional familialistic with a choice between paid parental leave and childcare services, Iceland follows a strong adult worker model with familizing and de-familizing policies in quick succession. Leave take-up rates of fathers and employment rates of mothers differ enormously between the three countries. This is due to differences in policy design with regard to father’s quotas, benefit levels and the length of the leave as well as to the availability of high quality childcare services. The advantages and shortfalls of the three different models of reconciliation will be analysed from a gender equality perspective.

Keywords

Reconciliation policy Parental leave Gender equality 

References

  1. Arnalds, Ásdìs A., Guðný Björk Eydal, and Ingólfur V. Gíslason. 2013. Equal Rights to Paid Parental Leave and Caring Fathers—The Case of Iceland. Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration 9(2): 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. 2008. Evaluation des Gesetzes zum Elterngeld und zur Elternzeit. Endbericht 2008. Accessed 27 January 2016. http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Abteilung2/Pdf-Anlagen/beeg-evaluation-endbericht,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf
  3. ———. 2009. Evaluationsbericht Bundeselterngeld- und Elternzeitgesetz 2009. Accessed 27 January 2016. http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Broschuerenstelle/Pdf-Anlagen/beeg-evaluation,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf
  4. ———. 2014. Dossier Müttererwerbstätigkeit. Erwerbstätigkeit, Erwerbsumfang und Erwerbsvolumen 2012. Accessed 27 January 2016. http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Broschuerenstelle/PdfAnlagen/M_C3_BCttererwerbst_C3_A4tigkeit-dossier,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf
  5. Bruning, Gwennaële, and Janneke Plantenga. 1999. Parental Leave and Equal Opportunities: Experiences in Eight European Countries. Journal of European Social Policy 9(3): 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Einarsdóttir, Thorgerdur, and Gyða Margrét Pétursdóttir. 2008. Iceland. In International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2008, ed. Peter Moss, and Marta Korintus, 233–240. London: Employment Market Analysis and Research.Google Scholar
  7. Fuchs, Regina, and Stephan Marik-Lebeck. 2014. Familie und Erwerbstätigkeit 2013. Statistische Nachrichten 9: 665–672.Google Scholar
  8. Gíslason, Ingólfur V. 2012. Vaterschaftsurlaub und der Anteil von Vätern an der Elternzeit in Island. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  9. Gornick, Janet C., and Marcia K. Meyers. 2008. Creating Gender Egalitarian Societies: An Agenda for Reform. Politics & Society 36(3): 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gottschall, Karin, and Katherine Bird. 2003. Family Leave Policies and Labor Market Segregation in Germany: Reinvention or Reform of the Male Breadwinner Model? Review of Policy Research 20(1): 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Javornik, Jana. 2014. Measuring State De-familialism: Contesting Post-socialist Exceptionalism. Journal of European Social Policy 24(3): 240–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keller, Matthias, and Thomas Haustein. 2014. Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf. Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2013. Wirtschaft und Statistik 12: 733–753.Google Scholar
  13. Leitner, Sigrid. 2003. Varieties of Familialism. The Caring Function of the Family in Comparative Perspective. European Societies 5(4): 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2010. Germany Outpaces Austria: The Historical Contingencies of Conservative Progressivism in Family Policy. Journal of European Social Policy 20(5): 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2013. Varianten von Familialismus Eine historisch vergleichende Analyse der Kinderbetreuungs- und Altenpflegepolitiken in kontinentaleuropäischen Wohlfahrtsstaaten. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leitner, Sigrid, and Stephan Lessenich. 2007. (In-)Dependence as Dependent Variable: Conceptualising and Measuring ‘De-familization’. In Investigating Welfare State Change. The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis, ed. Jochen Clasen, and Nico A. Siegel, 244–260. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Moss, Peter. 2008. Making Parental Leave Parental: An Overview of Policies to Increase Fathers’ Use of Leave. In International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2008, ed. Peter Moss, and Marta Korintus, 79–84. London: Employment Market Analysis and Research.Google Scholar
  18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1995. Employment Outlook. July 1995. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.Google Scholar
  19. Pétursdóttir, Gyða Margrét, and Thorgerdur Einarsdóttir. 2008. Making Parental Leave Parental: Fathers on Leave in Iceland. In International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2008, ed. Peter Moss, and Marta Korintus, 85–90. London: Employment Market Analysis and Research.Google Scholar
  20. Pfahl, Svenja, Stefan Reuyß, Dietmar Hobler, and Sonja Weeber. 2014. Nachhaltige Effekte der Elterngeldnutzung durch Väter. Gleichstellungspolitische Auswirkungen von Elterngeldmonaten durch erwerbstätige Väter auf betrieblicher und partnerschaftlicher Ebene. Projektbericht. Accessed 27 January 2016. http://www.boeckler.de/pdf_fof/S-2012-572-3-5.pdf
  21. Ray, Rebecca, Janet C. Gornick, and John Schmitt. 2010. Who Cares? Assessing Generosity and Gender Equality in Parental Leave Policy Designs in 21 Countries. Journal of European Social Policy 20(3): 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rille-Pfeiffer, Christiane, and Olaf Kapella. 2012. Evaluierung Kinderbetreuungsgeld. Einkommensabhängige und pauschale Bezugsvariante 12 + 2 Monate. Wien: Österreichisches Institut für Familienforschung.Google Scholar
  23. Rønsen, Marit. 1999. Assessing the Impact of Parental Leave: Effects on Fertility and Female Employment. In Parental Leave: Progress or Pitfall? ed. Peter Moss, and Fred Deven, 193–225. The Hague/Brussels: NIDI/CBGS Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Schober, Pia, and Katharina Spieß. 2015. Local Day Care Quality and Maternal Employment: Evidence from East and West Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family 77(3): 712–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Statistik Austria. 2015. Kinderbetreuungsquoten nach Altersgruppen 1995-2014. Accessed 20 January 2016. http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/bildung_und_kultur/formales_bildungswesen/kindertagesheime_kinderbetreuung/index.html
  26. Statistisches Bundesamt. 2015. Öffentliche Sozialleistungen. Statistik zum Elterngeld. Beendete Leistungsbezüge für im Jahr 2013 geborene Kinder. Accessed 20 January 2016. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Soziales/Elterngeld/ElterngeldGeburtenJ_5229201139004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sigrid Leitner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Management and Organization in Social Work (IMOS)University of Applied Sciences CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations