Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Symbolic Policy Making for Gender Equality: Comparing the Use of Quotas for Civil Service and Corporate Boards in France and Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Gender and Family in European Economic Policy

Abstract

The introduction of gender quota regulations for corporate boards in France and Germany between 2011 and 2015 led to heated debates. These centred on the re-emergence of a policy instrument thought of as highly constraining to employers’ human resource management strategies. The European Commission also proposed to act on the issue in case of national inaction, which led to international momentum towards change. In this chapter, we question the historical re-emergence of this instrument in two quite heterogeneous national policy regimes for gender equality in employment and analyse the legislative design of successive waves of gender quotas especially in civil services. We also explore the argumentation patterns developed by the proponents of the most recent regulations. We show that the new acceptability of gender quotas, especially among conservative parties and governments, lies in an acute malleability that fiercely contradicts the image of a highly constraining instrument for gender equality in employment. This comparative analysis evidences durable ‘symbolic policy making’ through gender quotas. Nevertheless, renewed pro-quota discourse among conservative parties proves that a symbolic instrument does have the power to provoke genuine institutional change in gender equality policy making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amintas, Alain, and Annie Junter. 2009. L’égalité prise au piège de la rhétorique manageriale. Cahiers du Genre 2(47): 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E. 1990. Public Policymaking: An Introduction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarz-Braun, Iris. 2000. Berufliche Gleichstellungspolitik für Frauen in den USA, Großbritannien und Deutschland. Unterschiede, Gemeinsamkeiten, politische Schlussfolgerungen. In Das Forschungsjahr 2000, ed. Deutsches Jugendinstitut, 35–45. München: Verlag Deutsches Jugendinstitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereni, Laure. 2009. Faire de la diversité une richesse pour l’entreprise. La transformation d’une contrainte juridique en catégorie managériale. Raisons politiques 3(35): 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berghahn, Sabine. 2011. Der Ritt auf der Schnecke. Accessed 26 April 2016. http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/gpo/pol_sys/gleichstellung/Der_Ritt_auf_der_Schnecke/index.html

  • ———. 2012. Vereint im Kampf für die Frauenquote in Aufsichtsräten? Eine kommentierende Betrachtung. Accessed 25 April 2016. http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/gpo/Aktuelles/berghahnquote.pdf

  • Berrey, Ellen. 2015. The Enigma of Diversity: The Language of Race and the Limits of Racial Justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bothfeld, Silke. 2008. Under Reconstruction: Die Fragmentierung des deutschen Geschlechterregimes durch die neue Familienpolitik. Accessed 25 April 2016. http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2008/718/pdf/AP_1_2008.pdf

  • Bothfeld, Silke, and Sophie Rouault. 2015. Was macht eine effiziente Gleichstellungspolitik aus? Zur Koordination und Ausgestaltung von Instrumenten der beruflichen Gleichstellung. WSI-Mitteilungen 68(1): 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bothfeld, Silke, Sophie Rouault, and Sebastian Hübers. 2010. Gleichstellunspolitische Rahmenbedingungen für das betriebliche Handeln: Ein internationaler Vergleich. In Geschlechterungleichheiten im Betrieb. Arbeit, Entlohnung und Gleichstellung in der Privatwirtschaft, ed. Projektgruppe GIB–Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, 21–88. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. 2010. Zweiter Erfahrungsbericht der Bundesregierung zum Bundesgleichstellungsgesetz. Fünfter Gremienbericht der Bundesregierung zum Bundesgremienbesetzungsgesetz. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.

    Google Scholar 

  • Direction générale de l’administration et de la fonction publique. 2003. Deuxième rapport du Comité de pilotage pour l’égal accès des femmes et des hommes aux emplois supérieurs des fonctions publiques. Paris: Documentation francaise.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. La mise en oeuvre du principe d’égalité des sexes dans la function publique. Dixième rapport au Parlement. Paris: Ministère de la function publique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Use of Politics. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, Charles D., and Roger W. Cobb. 1983. The Political Use of Symbols. New York and London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. The Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein, Timo. 2011. The Politics of Ideas in Welfare State Transformation: Christian Democracy and the Reform of Family Policy in Germany. Social Politics 18(4): 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Gesine, Andrea Leitner, and Sophie Rouault. 2015. Comparing Governance Regimes for Equal Opportunities: Federal Administrations as Employers in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. In Gender Equality in Context: Policies and Practices in Switzerland, ed. Brigitte Liebig, Karin Gottschall, and Birgit Sauer, 21–42. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüngling, Christiane, and Daniela Ratstetter. 2011. Die Implementierung von Gleichstellungsmaßnahmen: Optionen, Widerstände und Erfolgsstrategien. In Chancengleichheit durch Personalpolitik, ed. Gertrude Krell, Renate Ortlieb, and Barbara Sieben, 25–40. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Junter, Annie. 2004. L’égalité professionnelle entre les femmes et les hommes: une exigence politique au coeur du droit du travail. Travail, Genre et Sociétés 2(12): 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenner, Christina. 2007. Gleichstellungspolitik vor alten und neuen Herausforderungen—Welchen Beitrag leistet die Familienpolitik? WSI-Mitteilungen 60(10): 523–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodré, Petra, and Henrike Müller. 2003. Shifting Policy Frames: EU Equal Treatment Norms and Domestic Discourses in Germany. In Gendering Europeanisation, ed. Ulrike Liebert, 83–116. Brussels: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, Jacqueline. 2003. Equal Employment Policy in France. Symbolic Support and Mixed Records. Review of Policy Research 20(3): 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Jane. 1992. Gender Development and Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy 2(3): 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, Heather. 2006. Rescaling Gender Relations. The Influence of European Directives on the German Gender Regime. Social Politics 13(4): 522–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, Amy G. 1995. Gender Bias and the State. Symbolic Reform at Work in Fifth Republic France. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, Francoise. 2011. L’inégalité entre les femmes et les hommes dans la haute fonction publique: du constat aux moyens d’y remédier. Politiques et Management Public 28(2): 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papier, Hans-Jürgen, and Martin Heidebach. 2014. Rechtsgutachten zur Frage der Zulässigkeit von Zielquoten für Frauen in Führungspositionen im öffentlichen Dienst sowie zur Verankerung von Sanktionen bei Nichteinhaltung. Düsseldorf: Ministerium für Inneres und Kommunales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfarr, Heide. 1988. Quoten und Grundgesetz. Notwendigkeit und Verfassungsmäßigkeit von Frauenförderung. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, Silke, and Amy G. Mazur. 2003. Paradoxes of Gender-Biased Universalism: The Dynamics of French Equality Discourse. In Gendering Europeanisation, ed. Ulrike Liebert, 47–82. Brussels: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouault, Sophie. 2016. Die schneckenartige Feminisierung der Bundesgremien. Zur Novellierung des Bundesgremiengesetzes. Femina Politica 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimeta, Julia. 2012. Einsam an der Spitze: Frauen in Führungspositionen im öffentlichen Sektor. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1988. Comparing National Systems of Social Provision: A Policy-Centred Approach. Washington: Paper Presented at the Annual meeting of the APSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, Siri, Ruth V. Aguilera, and Ruth Lorenz. 2014. Legislating a Woman’s Seat on the Board: Institutional Factors Driving Gender Quotas for Boards of Directors. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2083-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, Siri, Ruth Sealy, and Val Singh. 2009. Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17(3): 320–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, Angelika von. 2005. Liberal, Conservative, Social Democratic, or … European? The European Union as Equal Employment Regime. Social Politics 12(1): 67–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. A ‘Women’s Revolution from Above’? Female Leadership, Intersectionality, and Public Policy under the Merkel Government. German Politics 20(3): 392–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliarty, Sarah Elise. 2013. Gender as a Modernising Force in the German CDU. German Politics 22(1–2): 172–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bremen University for Applied Sciences, Bremen, Germany

    Sophie Rouault

Authors
  1. Sophie Rouault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie Rouault .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences, Bielefeld, Germany

    Diana Auth

  2. University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Jutta Hergenhan

  3. University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Barbara Holland-Cunz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rouault, S. (2017). Symbolic Policy Making for Gender Equality: Comparing the Use of Quotas for Civil Service and Corporate Boards in France and Germany. In: Auth, D., Hergenhan, J., Holland-Cunz, B. (eds) Gender and Family in European Economic Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41513-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41513-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41512-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41513-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation