Political Representation of Women in Europe. What Accounts for the Increase in the 2000s?

Chapter

Abstract

In the last 15 years, political representation of women both in parliaments and in governments in Europe has increased. Interestingly, increases occurred in countries with legislated gender quotas, but also in states where softer voluntary party quotas exist as well as with parties that do not have any formal quota. How can we account for this improvement? Feminist political research has argued that a comprehensive model of explanation is needed that takes into account social structures as well as norms and institutions. However, the causal relations and differentiated influences are far from clear. This paper takes this “magic triangle” as a starting point and uses comparative data for all three kinds of factors to search for causal relationships with the development of female representation in national parliaments. We apply regression analysis, explorative clustering and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fzQCA). Consistent results obtained from all methods applied include the complementarity of legislated gender quotas, on the one hand, and voluntary quotas with good electoral proportionality, on the other hand. Socio-economic data had no reasonable impact on women’s representation in Europe. Political culture, like the tradition of universal female suffrage, proved to be sometimes relevant. However, we need better qualitative and quantitative data for political culture for further investigations.

Keywords

Political representation Descriptive representation Gender equality Europe Triangulation of methods 

References

  1. Bourque, Susan, and Jean Grossholtz. 1984. Politics as Unnatural Practice: Political Science Looks at Female Participation. In Women and the Public Sphere. A Critique of Sociology and Politics, ed. Jean Silanen, and Michelle Stanworth, 103–121. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  2. Brunsbach, Sandra. 2011. Machen Frauen den Unterschied? Parlamentarierinnen als Repräsentantinnen frauenspezifischer Interessen im Bundestag. ZParl–Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 42(1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns, Nancy, Kay L. Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Hardvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Celis, Karen. 2006. Substantive Representation of Women: The Representation of Women’s Interests and the Impact of Descriptive Representation in the Belgian Parliament (1900–1979). Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28(2): 85–114. doi: 10.1300/J501v28n02_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2008. Studying Women’s Substantive Representation in Legislatures: When Representative Acts, Contexts and Women’s Interests Become Important. Representation 44(2): 111–123. doi: 10.1080/00344890802079516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Childs, Sarah, and Joni Lovenduski. 2013. Political Representation. In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, ed. Georgina Waylen, Karen Celis, Johanna Kantola, and S. Laurel Weldon, 489–513. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics. Scandinavian Political Studies 11(4): 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlerup, Drude, Zeina Hilal, Nana Kalandadze, and Rumbidzai Kandawasvika-Nhundu. 2013. Atlas of Electoral Gender Quotas. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  9. Dahlerup, Drude, and Monique Leyenaar. 2013. Introduction. In Breaking Male Dominance in Old Democracies, ed. Drude Dahlerup, and Monique Leyenaar, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dovi, Suzanne. 2011. Political Representation. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta: Stanford. Accessed 12 January 2013. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/political-representation
  11. Druciarek, Malgorzata, and Aleksandra Nizynska. 2015. Ist die Politik auch weiblich? Die Parlamentswahlen 2015 aus der Geschlechterperspektive. Polen-Analysen Nr. 172, 17.11.2015. Accessed 7 March 2016. http://www.laender-analysen.de/polen/pdf/PolenAnalysen172.pdf
  12. Franceschet, Susan, Mona L. Krook, and Jennifer M. Piscopo (ed). 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fuchs, Dieter. 2007. The Political Culture Paradigm. In Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. Russell J. Dalton, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 161–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fuchs, Gesine. 2013. Using Strategic Litigation for Women’s Rights: Political Restrictions in Poland and Achievements of the Women’s Movement. European Journal for Women’s Studies 20(1): 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2015. Substantielle Repräsentation im Schweizer Parlament: Zum Agenda Setting beruflicher Gleichstellungspolitik 1996–2011. Femina Politica 24(1): 73–83.Google Scholar
  16. Hoecker, Beate. 1995. Politische Partizipation von Frauen. Ein einführendes Studienbuch. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoecker, Beate (ed). 1998. Handbuch politische Partizipation von Frauen in Europa. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  18. Hoecker, Beate, and Gesine Fuchs (eds). 2004a. Handbuch politische Partizipation von Frauen in Europa II: Die Beitrittsstaaten zur Europäischen Union. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  19. ———, eds. 2004b. Politische Partizipation und Repräsentation von Frauen in den Beitrittsländern im Vergleich. In Handbuch politische Partizipation von Frauen in Europa II: Die Beitrittsstaaten zur Europäischen Union, eds. Beate Hoecker and Gesine Fuchs, 285–306. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  20. Karvonen, Lauri, and Per Selle (ed). 1995. Women in Nordic Politics: Closing the Gap. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  21. Kittilson, Miki C. 2013. Party Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, ed. Georgina Waylen, Karen Celis, Johanna Kantola, and S. Laurel Weldon, 536–553. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Korolczuk, Elzbieta, and Steven Saxonberg. 2014. Strategies of Contentious Action: A Comparative Analysis of the Women’s Movements in Poland and the Czech Republic. European Societies 17(4): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2014.977321.Google Scholar
  23. Krook, Mona L. 2010. Women’s Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Political Studies 58(5): 886–908. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00833.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krook, Mona L., and Leslie Schwindt-Bayer. 2013. Electoral Institutions. In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, ed. Georgina Waylen, Karen Celis, Johanna Kantola, and S. Laurel Weldon, 554–578. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lawless, Jennifer L., and Richard L. Fox. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lijphart, Arend. 1998. Thinking About Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lovenduski, Joni (ed). 2005. State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris (ed). 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Mackay, Fiona. 2008. ‘Thick’ Conception of Substantive Reprsentation: Women, Gender and Political Institutions. Representation 44(2): 125–139. doi: 10.1080/00344890802079607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mastropaolo, Alfio. 2011. Representation. In International Encyclopedia of Political Science, ed. Bertrand Badie, Dirk Berg-Schlosser, and Leonardo Morlino, 2274–2286. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Mateo-Diaz, Carmen. 2005. Representing Women? Female Legislators in Europe. Essex: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  33. Matland, R.E. 1998. Women’s Legislative Representation in National Legislatures: A Comparison of Democracies in Developed and Developing Countires. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1: 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Millard, Frances. 2014. Not Much Happened: The Impact of Gender Quotas in Poland. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norris, Pippa (ed). 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recriutment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. ———, ed. 2009. Political Activism: New Challenges, New Oppportunities. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes, 628–649. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Paxton, Pamela, Jennifer Green, and Melanie M. Hughes. 2008. Dataset Women in Parliament, 1945–2003: Cross-National Dataset. Accessed 10 January 2016. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu
  38. Perkins, Richard, and Eric Neumayer. 2007. Implementing Multilateral Environmental Agreements: An Analysis of EU Directives. Global Environmental Politics 7(3): 13–41. doi: 10.1162/glep.2007.7.3.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phillips, Anne. 1994. Democracy and Representation, or: Why Should It Matter, Who Our Representatives Are? Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für Politische Wissenschaft 34: 63–76.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pitkin, Hanna F. 2008. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: Univiversity of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2006. Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluation Their Consistency and Coverage. Political Analysis 14(3): 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, and Sharon L. Wolchik (ed). 2009. Women in Power in Post-Communist Parliaments. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sauer, Birgit. 1994. Was heißt und zu welchem Zweck partizipieren wir? Kritische Anmerkungen zur Partizipationsforschung. In Demokratie oder Androkratie? Theorie und Praxis demokratischer Herrschaft in der feministischen Diskussion, ed. Elke Biester, Barbara Holland-Cunz, and Birgit Sauer, 99–130. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  47. Schneider, Carsten Q., and Claudius Wagemann. 2007. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy Sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  48. Senti, Martin. 1999. Parlamentarierinnen zwischen Fraktionsdisziplin und Frauensolidarität: Eine Analyse des Abstim mungsverhaltens im schweizerischen Nationalrat. Swiss Political Science Review 5(1): 57–79. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.1999.tb00262.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sledzinska-Simon, Agnieszka, and Adam Bodnar. 2013. Gender Equality from Beneath: Electoral Gender Quotas in Poland. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 28(2): 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stockemer, Daniel. 2008. Women’s Representation: A Comparison Between Europe and the Americas. Politics 28(2): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Studlar, Donley T., and Ian Mc Allister. 2002. Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women’s Legislative Representation Since 1950. European Journal of Political Research 41: 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomann, Eva. 2015a. Customizing Europe: Transposition as Bottom-Up Implementation. Journal of European Public Policy 22(10): 1368–1387. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ———. 2015b. Is Output Performance All About the Resources? A Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Street-Level Bureaucrats in Switzerland. Public Administration 93(1): 177–194. doi: 10.1111/padm.12130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Westle, Bettina. 2001. Politische Partizipation und Geschlecht. In Politische Partizipation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Empirische Befunde und theoretische Erklärungen, ed. Achim Koch, Martina Wasmer, and Peter Schmidt, 131–168. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Work, Institute of Social Management, Social Policy and PreventionLucerne University of Applied Sciences and ArtsLucerneSwitzerland
  2. 2.UrbanfishBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations