Skip to main content

Perceptual Comparison of Multi-exposure High Dynamic Range and Single-Shot Camera RAW Photographs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9730))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2710 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we evaluate the perceptual fidelity of single-shot low dynamic range photographs of high dynamic range scenes. We argue that contemporary DSLR (digital single-lens reflex) cameras equipped with the high-end sensors are enough to capture full luminance range of the majority of typical scenes. The RGB images computed directly from the camera sensor data, called RAW images, retain the entire dynamic range of the sensor, however, they suffer from visible noise in dark regions. In this work we evaluate visibility of this noise in a perceptual experiment, in which people manually mark differences between a single-shot camera RAW image and a corresponding high quality image - the high dynamic range photograph created using the multi-exposure technique. We also show that the HDR-VDP-2 image quality metric can be efficiently applied to automatically detect noisy regions without the need for time-consuming experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mann, S., Picard, R.W.: On being undigital with digital cameras: Extending dynamic range by combining differently exposed pictures. In: Proceedings of IS&T, pp. 442–448 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reinhard, E., Ward, G., Pattanaik, S., Debevec, P.: High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mantiuk, R., Kim, K.J., Rempel, A.G., Heidrich, W.: HDR-VDP-2: A calibrated visual metric for visibility and quality predictions in all luminance conditions. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 40:1–40:14 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aydin, T.O., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., Seidel, H.P.: Dynamic range independent image quality assessment. In: ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 27, p. 69. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., Simoncelli, E.: Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13, 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foi, A., Trimeche, M., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K.: Practical poissonian-gaussian noise modeling and fitting for single-image raw-data. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17, 1737–1754 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirk, K., Andersen, H.J.: Noise characterization of weighting schemes for combination of multiple exposures. In: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 115.1–115.10. BMVA Press (2006) doi:10.5244/C.20.115

  8. Mantiuk, R., Krawczyk, G., Mantiuk, R., Seidel, H.P.: High dynamic range imaging pipeline: Perception-motivated representation of visual content. In: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XII, Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 6492 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tomaszewska, A., Mantiuk, R.: Image registration for multi-exposure high dynamic range image acquisition. In: Proceedings of WSCG, pp. 49–56 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., Seidel, H.P.: A perceptual framework for contrast processing of high dynamic range images. In: Proceedings of Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, pp. 87–94. ACM Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Čadík, M., Herzog, R., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., Seidel, H.P.: New measurements reveal weaknesses of image quality metrics in evaluating graphics artifacts. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 31, 147 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.: Modern Image Quality Assessment. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baldi, P., Brunak, S., Chauvin, Y., Anderson, C.A.F., Nielsen, H.: Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview. Bioinformatics 16, 640–648 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Čadík, M., Herzog, R., Mantiuk, R., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., Seidel, H.P.: Learning to predict localized distortions in rendered images. Comput. Graph. Forum 32, 401–410 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sergej, T., Mantiuk, R.: Perceptual evaluation of demosaicing artefacts. In: Campilho, A., Kamel, M. (eds.) ICIAR 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8814, pp. 38–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was funded by the Polish National Science Centre (decision number DEC-2013/09/B/ST6/02270).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radosław Mantiuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sergej, T., Mantiuk, R. (2016). Perceptual Comparison of Multi-exposure High Dynamic Range and Single-Shot Camera RAW Photographs. In: Campilho, A., Karray, F. (eds) Image Analysis and Recognition. ICIAR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9730. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41501-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41501-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41500-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41501-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics