Skip to main content

Poverty Alleviation: An Opportunity for Universities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Issues in Poverty Alleviation

Part of the book series: Studies in Global Justice ((JUST,volume 14))

  • 635 Accesses

Abstract

How can universities promote a preferential “option of the poor”? In my chapter I will articulate three dimensions and show how they are connected with issues of identity: education, positioning, transformation.

  1. (i)

    Education is the central idea of a university. Education can strengthen the abilities to deal with difficult situations, like poverty. In fact, the university has the opportunity and the responsibility to cultivate such resources. According to Martha Nussbaum a university should promote the ability to lead an “examined life”. It should promote the ability to think in terms of common humanity and the ability to narrative imagination, such as the use of myths, symbols, narratives and poetry. In this way education helps to cultivate a sense of belonging that is not contingent of social groups (humanity), a sense of detachment from external circumstances (“examined life”) and a sense of interiority and orientation beyond material values (narrative imagination).

  2. (ii)

    Universities can contribute to an “option for the poor” by taking up positions. There are at least four important dimensions: First, the university recognizes academic freedom. Universities are free to address the situation of people experiencing poverty and poverty alleviation, e.g. in lectures. Second, the university knows freedom of research. Hence also research can contribute to a deeper understanding of poverty and the development of social innovation and poverty reduction efforts. Third, universities build communities of teachers and students, networks within the scientific community. Granting access to such networks for socially disadvantaged students or teachers or collaboration between the University and poverty stricken persons can express an “option for the poor”. Fourth, the University has political weight and can take up positions in the sense of Ignacio Ellacurías considerations on the political role of universities.

  3. (iii)

    Finally, such a positioning and consequent involvement offers opportunities for transformation. Transformation is in fact the basic idea behind the Christian understanding of an “option for the poor”. It is about to be touched by the mystery of poverty. It is about to develop real friendships with people experiencing poverty. Such encounter opens the scope for a transformation that converts people’s interiority. This may just be possible within a university.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Translated from the German original: “Klar ist mir … nur, daß eine ‘Bildung’, die in der Gefahr versagt, keine ist. Bildung muß der Gefahr und dem Tod gegenübertreten können”.

References

  • Barder, Owen. 2009. What is poverty reduction? Working paper 170. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, Russell W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15: 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieri, Peter. 2011. Wie wollen wir leben? Salzburg: Residenz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. 2011. Widerstand und Ergebung. Briefe und Aufzeichnungen aus der Haft. Vollständige Ausgabe, versehen mit Einleitung, Anmerkungen und Kommentaren. Ed. Chr. Gremmels, E. Bethge, R. Bethge in collaboration with I. Tödt. Bonhoeffer Werke. Volume 8. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, Karen. 1999. It’s not only wealth that matters – it’s peace of mind too: A review of participatory work on poverty and illbeing. IDS study report, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Kevin F. 2000. The ground beneath the cross. The theology of Ignacio Ellacuría. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Robert. 2013. Rural development. Putting the last first. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, John M. 1997. Boyhood. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Gerald A. 2008. Rescuing justice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crépon, Bruno, et al. 2013a. Do labor market policies have displacement effects? Quarterly Journal of Economics 128: 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crépon, Bruno, et al. 2013b. Job placement and displacement. J-PAL Policy Briefcase. Cambridge, MA: Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen. 2006. The second-person standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, Danny. 2011. Injustice. Why social inequality persists. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, Alan. 2009. The weariness of self. Quebec: McGill Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, Glen. 1999. Children of the great depression. Social change in life experience. Reprint. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellacuría, Ignacio. 1991. Is a different kind of university possible? In Towards a society that serves its people, ed. Hassett John and Lacey Hugh. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry G. 1998. The importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry G. 2004. The reasons of love. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, Midge. 2012. The Barbed-Wire University. The real lives of allied prisoners of war in the Second World War. London: Aurum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, Leo. 2011. C. Northcote Parkinson’s Parkinson’s Law. A modern interpretation of a management classic. Oxford: Infinite Ideas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, Laura. 2013. Community-based service-learning: Partnerships of reciprocal exchange? Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education 14(3): 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden, Blaine. 2013. Escape from camp, 14th ed. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss-White, Barbara. 2002. A note on destitution, Queen Elizabeth House working paper 86. Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Katharina. 2012. Wir müssen leider draußen bleiben. Die neue Armut in der Konsumgesellschaft. Munich: Blessing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumer-Nevo, Michal. 2010. Critical poverty knowledge: Contesting othering and social distancing. Current Sociology 58(5): 693–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, Thomas. 2011. In der Schlange.Mein Jahr auf Hartz IV. Munich: Goldmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Daniel. 2008. The comfort of things. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, Deepa, et al. 2000. Voices of the poor. Can anyone hear us? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, John H. 1887. The idea of a university. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 1997. Cultivating humanity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prowse, Martin. 2007. Aid effectiveness: The role of qualitative research in impact evaluation. Background note. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schicho, Walter. 2007. What did Mr. Wolfensohn mean (intend), when he spoke of (about) poverty? In Perspectives in poverty alleviation, ed. Thomas Böhler and Clemens Sedmak, 265–280. Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Don J. 1997. The cliff walk. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Report, Vol 1. Johannesburg 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmann, William T. 2007. Poor people. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, David F. 2009. This is water. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, Muhammad. 2007a. Banker to the poor. Philadelphia: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, Muhammad. 2007b. Creating a world without poverty. Philadelphia: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Sedmak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sedmak, C. (2016). Poverty Alleviation: An Opportunity for Universities. In: Gaisbauer, H., Schweiger, G., Sedmak, C. (eds) Ethical Issues in Poverty Alleviation. Studies in Global Justice, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41430-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics