Abstract
How can universities promote a preferential “option of the poor”? In my chapter I will articulate three dimensions and show how they are connected with issues of identity: education, positioning, transformation.
-
(i)
Education is the central idea of a university. Education can strengthen the abilities to deal with difficult situations, like poverty. In fact, the university has the opportunity and the responsibility to cultivate such resources. According to Martha Nussbaum a university should promote the ability to lead an “examined life”. It should promote the ability to think in terms of common humanity and the ability to narrative imagination, such as the use of myths, symbols, narratives and poetry. In this way education helps to cultivate a sense of belonging that is not contingent of social groups (humanity), a sense of detachment from external circumstances (“examined life”) and a sense of interiority and orientation beyond material values (narrative imagination).
-
(ii)
Universities can contribute to an “option for the poor” by taking up positions. There are at least four important dimensions: First, the university recognizes academic freedom. Universities are free to address the situation of people experiencing poverty and poverty alleviation, e.g. in lectures. Second, the university knows freedom of research. Hence also research can contribute to a deeper understanding of poverty and the development of social innovation and poverty reduction efforts. Third, universities build communities of teachers and students, networks within the scientific community. Granting access to such networks for socially disadvantaged students or teachers or collaboration between the University and poverty stricken persons can express an “option for the poor”. Fourth, the University has political weight and can take up positions in the sense of Ignacio Ellacurías considerations on the political role of universities.
-
(iii)
Finally, such a positioning and consequent involvement offers opportunities for transformation. Transformation is in fact the basic idea behind the Christian understanding of an “option for the poor”. It is about to be touched by the mystery of poverty. It is about to develop real friendships with people experiencing poverty. Such encounter opens the scope for a transformation that converts people’s interiority. This may just be possible within a university.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Translated from the German original: “Klar ist mir … nur, daß eine ‘Bildung’, die in der Gefahr versagt, keine ist. Bildung muß der Gefahr und dem Tod gegenübertreten können”.
References
Barder, Owen. 2009. What is poverty reduction? Working paper 170. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
Belk, Russell W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15: 139–168.
Bieri, Peter. 2011. Wie wollen wir leben? Salzburg: Residenz.
Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. 2011. Widerstand und Ergebung. Briefe und Aufzeichnungen aus der Haft. Vollständige Ausgabe, versehen mit Einleitung, Anmerkungen und Kommentaren. Ed. Chr. Gremmels, E. Bethge, R. Bethge in collaboration with I. Tödt. Bonhoeffer Werke. Volume 8. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.
Brock, Karen. 1999. It’s not only wealth that matters – it’s peace of mind too: A review of participatory work on poverty and illbeing. IDS study report, Brighton.
Burke, Kevin F. 2000. The ground beneath the cross. The theology of Ignacio Ellacuría. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Chambers, Robert. 2013. Rural development. Putting the last first. Abingdon: Routledge.
Coetzee, John M. 1997. Boyhood. London: Penguin.
Cohen, Gerald A. 2008. Rescuing justice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crépon, Bruno, et al. 2013a. Do labor market policies have displacement effects? Quarterly Journal of Economics 128: 2.
Crépon, Bruno, et al. 2013b. Job placement and displacement. J-PAL Policy Briefcase. Cambridge, MA: Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
Darwall, Stephen. 2006. The second-person standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dorling, Danny. 2011. Injustice. Why social inequality persists. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ehrenberg, Alan. 2009. The weariness of self. Quebec: McGill Queen’s University Press.
Elder, Glen. 1999. Children of the great depression. Social change in life experience. Reprint. Boulder: Westview.
Ellacuría, Ignacio. 1991. Is a different kind of university possible? In Towards a society that serves its people, ed. Hassett John and Lacey Hugh. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1998. The importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frankfurt, Harry G. 2004. The reasons of love. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gillies, Midge. 2012. The Barbed-Wire University. The real lives of allied prisoners of war in the Second World War. London: Aurum.
Gough, Leo. 2011. C. Northcote Parkinson’s Parkinson’s Law. A modern interpretation of a management classic. Oxford: Infinite Ideas.
Hammersley, Laura. 2013. Community-based service-learning: Partnerships of reciprocal exchange? Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education 14(3): 171–184.
Harden, Blaine. 2013. Escape from camp, 14th ed. London: Penguin.
Harriss-White, Barbara. 2002. A note on destitution, Queen Elizabeth House working paper 86. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Hartmann, Katharina. 2012. Wir müssen leider draußen bleiben. Die neue Armut in der Konsumgesellschaft. Munich: Blessing.
Krumer-Nevo, Michal. 2010. Critical poverty knowledge: Contesting othering and social distancing. Current Sociology 58(5): 693–714.
Mahler, Thomas. 2011. In der Schlange.Mein Jahr auf Hartz IV. Munich: Goldmann.
Miller, Daniel. 2008. The comfort of things. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Narayan, Deepa, et al. 2000. Voices of the poor. Can anyone hear us? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newman, John H. 1887. The idea of a university. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1997. Cultivating humanity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Prowse, Martin. 2007. Aid effectiveness: The role of qualitative research in impact evaluation. Background note. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Schicho, Walter. 2007. What did Mr. Wolfensohn mean (intend), when he spoke of (about) poverty? In Perspectives in poverty alleviation, ed. Thomas Böhler and Clemens Sedmak, 265–280. Münster: LIT.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Basic Books.
Snyder, Don J. 1997. The cliff walk. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Report, Vol 1. Johannesburg 1998.
Vollmann, William T. 2007. Poor people. San Francisco: Harper.
Wallace, David F. 2009. This is water. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Yunus, Muhammad. 2007a. Banker to the poor. Philadelphia: Perseus.
Yunus, Muhammad. 2007b. Creating a world without poverty. Philadelphia: Perseus.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sedmak, C. (2016). Poverty Alleviation: An Opportunity for Universities. In: Gaisbauer, H., Schweiger, G., Sedmak, C. (eds) Ethical Issues in Poverty Alleviation. Studies in Global Justice, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41430-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41430-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41428-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41430-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)