Skip to main content

Information Processing and Mental Models: World Views

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crisis Management in Acute Care Settings

Abstract

At 10:35 in the morning, two ambulances are sent to the site of a rural two-car traffic accident. The first unit that arrives at the scene confirms that two cars are involved and three people have been injured. According to eyewitnesses, the driver of one of the cars lost control of his vehicle, and the two cars had a head-on collision. The two occupants of the second vehicle have only minor injuries, but the driver who caused the accident is comatose. After assessment and triage, the second EMS team focuses on the two mildly injured occupants, one of whom is complaining of paresthesia, likely secondary to a whiplash injury. The unconscious victim is rescued from his vehicle and transferred to the ambulance by the first team. He receives oxygen via face mask and two large-bore intravenous lines are inserted. A normal blood sugar finger stick rules out hypoglycemia as a cause for the unconsciousness. Volume resuscitation is started and the patient is intubated. As the victim shows no external injuries, the working diagnosis at this point includes deceleration injury with severe internal bleeding, injuries to major intra-abdominal organs, and severe head injury. After 2,000 ml of crystalloid solution is infused without any effect on the arterial blood pressure, an epinephrine drip is started. The jugular veins are noted as markedly distended which suggests the possibility of a pneumothorax. However, chest auscultation reveals bilateral breath sounds, and chest palpation shows no rib fractures or subcutaneous emphysema. Thus, the diagnosis of pneumothorax is ruled out. On arrival at the emergency department, the patient continues to be hemodynamically unstable. An ultrasound scan shows no intra-abdominal organ injuries or free intraperitoneal fluid. The chest X-ray reveals adequately ventilated lungs, marked perihilar congestion, normal aortic arch, and significantly enlarged cardiac silhouette. Up to this point, 3,500 ml of crystalloid solution has been infused, and the rate of the epinephrine drip has reached 5 mg per hour. A transesophageal echocardiography is performed revealing a dilated left ventricle with severe inferior and apical akinesia. The patient dies shortly after admission to the ICU as a result of severe cardiogenic shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson JR (1983) The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C, Weber M (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. J Risk Uncertain 5:325–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croskerry P (2008) Cognitive and affective dispositions to respond. In: Croskerry P, Cosby KS, Schenkel SM, Wears RL (eds) Patient safety in emergency medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Croskerry P (2009) A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med 84(8):1022–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curley SP, Yates JF, Abrams RA (1986) Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 38:230–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser V, Woods DD (1990) Fixation errors: failures to revise situation assessment in dynamic and risky systems. In: Colombo AG, Bustamante AS (eds) Systems reliability assessment. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobelli R (2013) The art of thinking clearly. Sceptre Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner D (1996) The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Metropolitan Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner D, Kreuzig H, Reither F, Stäudel T (1983) Lohhausen. Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität [Lohhausen. Dealing with uncertainty and complexity]. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75:643–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37:32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR, Garland D (2000) Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans JSBT (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:255–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JSBT, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspect Psychol Sci 8(3):223–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaba D (1992) Dynamic decision-making in anesthesiology: cognitive models and training approaches. In: Evans DA, Patel VL (eds) Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 123–148

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G (2000) Adaptive thinking. Rationality in the real world. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G (2008) Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. Penguin Random House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 62:451–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell M (2005) Blink. The power of thinking without thinking. Back Bay Books/Little Brown, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins FH (1987) Human factors in flight. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath C, Tversky A (1991) Preference and belief: ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 4:5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig R, Todd P (2001) More is not always better: the benefits of cognitive limits. In: Hardman D (ed) The psychology of reasoning and decision-making: a handbook. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, interference, and consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice. Mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58(9):697–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2012) Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein G (1992) A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision-making. In: Klein G, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsamboka E (eds) Decision-making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood, pp 138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G (1998) Sources of power: how people make decisions. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G (2004) The power of intuition: how to use your gut feelings to make better decisions at work. Crown Publishing Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Houghton Mifflin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lompscher J (1972) Theoretische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung geistiger Fähigkeiten [Theoretical and experimental studies on the development of mental abilities]. Volk und Wissen, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J, Brown T, Thampy KJ (1985) Equilibration of cognitive structures: the central problem of intellectual development. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schank RC, Abelson R (1977) Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz O (1913) Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs [On the laws of structured thought processes]. Spemann, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1982) Models of bounded rationality, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2002) The affect heuristic. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (eds) Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 397–420

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (1994) Learning in and about complex systems. Syst Dyn Rev 10:291–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5:297–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

St.Pierre, M., Hofinger, G., Simon, R. (2016). Information Processing and Mental Models: World Views. In: Crisis Management in Acute Care Settings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41427-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41427-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41425-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41427-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics