Abstract
This chapter introduces the argument, research design and significance of the book, as well as its structure.
The book explains why and how security policies in the EU have evolved, since the creation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), and as a result of two new ideas—the growing importance of non-military crisis management and the comprehensive approach to security. The book contends that, in the first decade of the 2000s, a process of learning has characterised CSDP policy evolution towards a softer, more civilian character, rather than the military purpose it was supposed to fulfil. Learning was made possible by the presence and actions of overlapping communities of experts and practitioners.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, E. 2005. Communitarian international relations: The epistemic foundations of international relations. London/New York: Routledge.
——— 2008. The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14(2): 195–230.
Adler, E., and P.M. Haas. 1992. Conclusion: Epistemic communities, world order and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization 46(1): 367–390.
Adler, E., and V. Pouliot. 2011a. International practices. International Theory 3(1): 1–36.
———. (eds.). 2011b. International practices. Cambridge Studies in International Relations, October 2011.
Barnett, M.N., and M. Finnemore. 1999. The politics, power and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization 53(4, Autumn): 699–732.
Bicchi, F. 2011. The EU as a community of practice: Foreign policy communications in the COREU network. Journal of European Public Policy 18(8): 1115–1132.
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Checkel, J.T. 2005. International institutions and socialization in Europe. Special issue of International Organization 59(4, Fall): 801–1079.
Christiansen, T., K.E. Jorgensen, and A. Wiener. 1999. The social construction of Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 6(4): 528–544.
Créplet, F., O. Dupouet, and E. Vaast. 2003. Episteme or practice? Differentiated communitarian structures in a biology laboratory. In Communities and technologies: Proceedings of the first international conference on communities and technologies, ed. M. Huysman, E. Wenger, and V. Wulf, 43–63. Amsterdam: Springer.
Cross, M.K. 2010. Cooperation by committee: The EU military committee and the committee for civilian crisis management. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies, Occasional Paper, February 2010.
——— 2011. Security integration in Europe: How knowledge-based networks are transforming the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Drent, M. 2011. The EU’s comprehensive approach to security: A culture of co-ordination? Studia Diplomatica LXIV(2): 3–18.
European Commission and HR/VP. 2013. Joint communication to the European Parliament and the Council: The EU’s comprehensive approach to external conflicts and crises. Doc. JOIN(2013) 30 final, 11 December 2013.
Foucault, M. 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.
Grevi, G., D. Helly, and D. Keohane. 2009. European security and defence policy: The first 10 years (1999–2009). Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
Haas, E.B. 1990a. When knowledge is power: Three models of change in international organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haas, P.M. 1990b. Saving the Mediterranean: The politics of international environmental cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
——— 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46(1): 1–35.
Hall, P. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–296.
Howorth, J. 2007. Security and defence policy in the European Union, European Union series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, S.G. 2007. The rise of European security cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Juncos, A.E. 2006. Learning by doing: Civil-military co-ordination in EU crisis management policies. Paper presented at the Third Pan-European Conference of the ECPR Standing Group on EU Politics, Istanbul, 21–23 September 2006.
Juncos, A.E., and K. Pomorska. 2006. Playing the Brussels game: Strategic socialisation in the CFSP Council Working Groups. European Integration Online papers, vol. 10.
Juncos, A.E., and C. Reynolds. 2007. The political and security committee: Governing in the shadow. European Foreign Affairs Review 12(2): 127–147.
Lachmann, N. 2010. NATO-CSDP-EU relations: Sketching the map of a community of practice. CEPSI, University of Montreal, FALL 2010.
Levy, J.S. 1994. Learning and foreign policy: Sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization 48: 279–312.
March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
McNamara, K. 1998. The currency of ideas. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Menon, A., and U. Sedelmeier. 2010. Instruments and intentionality: Civilian crisis management and enlargement conditionality in EU security policy. West European Politics 33(1): 75–92.
Mérand, F., S. Hofmann, and B. Irondelle. 2011. Governance and state power: A network analysis of European security. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(1): 121–147.
Meyer, C.O. 2006. The quest for a European strategic culture: Changing norms on security and defence in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nowak, A. (ed.). 2006. Civilian crisis management: The EU way. Chaillot paper no 90. EU Institute for Security Studies, June 2006.
Nye, J.S. 1987. Nuclear learning and US-Soviet security regimes. International Organization 41: 371–402.
Pierson, P. 1996. The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123–163.
Radaelli, C.M. 2009. Measuring policy learning: Regulatory impact assessment in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 16(8): 1145–1164.
Risse-Kappen, T. 1994. Ideas do not float freely: Transnational coalitions, domestic structures, and the end of the Cold War. International Organization 48(2): 185–214.
Ruggie, J.G. 1975. International responses to technology: Concepts and trends. International Organizations 29(3): 557–583.
Verdun, A. 1999. The role of the Delors Committee in the creation of EMU: An epistemic community? Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 308–328.
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zito, A.R. 2009. European agencies as agents of governance and EU learning. Journal of European Public Policy 16(8): 1224–1243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Faleg, G. (2017). Introduction: Ideas that Changed the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy. In: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy . Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41306-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41306-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41305-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41306-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)