Abstract
In this chapter, controllers with different complexity for the control benchmark proposed in 1990 at the American Control Conference will be tuned using a multiobjective optimization design procedure. The aim of this chapter is two fold: on the one hand, to evaluate the overall performance of two different controller structures on such a benchmark by means of a design concepts comparison; on the other hand, to state MOP in order to have a more reliable measure of the expected controller’s performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blasco X, Herrero J, Sanchis J, Martínez M (2008) A new graphical visualization of n-dimensional pareto front for decision-making in multiobjective optimization. Inf Sci 178(20):3908–3924
Byrns Jr EV, Calise AJ (1990) Fixed order dynamic compensation for the h2/hinf benchmark problem. In: American control conference, 1990. IEEE, pp 963–965
Chiang R, Safonov M (1990) H robust control synthesis for an undamped, non-colocated spring-mass system. In: American control conference. IEEE, pp 966–967
Collins E, Bernstein D (1990) Robust control design for a benchmark problem using a structured covariance approach. In: American control conference, no 27, pp 970–971
Frangopol DM, Maute K (2003) Life-cycle reliability-based optimization of civil and aerospace structures. Comput Struct 81(7):397–410
Ly U-L (1990) Robust control design using nonlinear constrained optimization. In: American control conference, 1990. IEEE, pp 968–969
Martínez M, Sanchis J, Blasco X (2006) Multiobjective controller design handling human preferences. Eng Appl Artif Intell 19:927–938
Martínez MA, Sanchis J, Blasco X (2006) Algoritmos genéticos aplicados al diseño de controladores robustos. RIAII 3(1):39–51
Messac A, Wilsont B (1998) Physical programming for computational control. AIAA J 36(2):219–226
Reynoso-Meza G, Blasco X, Sanchis J, Herrero JM (2013) Comparison of design concepts in multi-criteria decision-making using level diagrams. Inf Sci 221:124–141
Reynoso-Meza G, Sanchis J, Blasco X, García-Nieto S (2014) Physical programming for preference driven evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Appl Soft Comput 24:341–362
Reynoso-Meza G, Sanchis J, Blasco X, Martínez M (2010) Design of continuous controllers using a multiobjective differential evolution algorithm with spherical pruning. In: Applications of evolutionary computation. Springer, pp 532–541
Rhee I, Speyer JL (1990) Application of a game theoretic controller to a benchmark problem. Am Control Conf 1990:972–973 May
Stengel RF, Marrison CI (1992) Robustness of solutions to a benchmark control problem. J Guid Control Dyn 15:1060–1067
Wie B, Bernstein DS (1990) A benchmark problem for robust control design. Am Control Conf 1990:961–962 May
Wie B, Bernstein DS (1992) Benchmark problems for robust control design. J Guid Control Dyn 15:1057–1059
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reynoso Meza, G., Blasco Ferragud, X., Sanchis Saez, J., Herrero Durá, J.M. (2017). The ACC’1990 Control Benchmark: A Two-Mass-Spring System. In: Controller Tuning with Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 85. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41301-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41301-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41299-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41301-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)