Skip to main content

Motivation: Multiobjective Thinking in Controller Tuning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 790 Accesses

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 85))

Abstract

Throughout this chapter, we intend to provide a multiobjective awareness of the controller tuning problem. Beyond the fact that several objectives and requirements must be fulfilled by a given controller, we will show the advantages of considering this problem in its multiobjective nature. That is, optimizing simultaneously several objectives and following a multiobjective optimization design (MOOD) procedure. Since the MOOD procedure provides the opportunity to obtain a set of solutions to describe the objectives trade-off for a given multiobjective problem (MOP), it is worthwhile to use it for controller tuning applications. Due to the fact that several specifications such as time and frequency requirements need to be fulfilled by the control engineer, a procedure to appreciate the trade-off exchange for complex processes is useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, using the fgoalattain function from the Matlab© Optimization Toolbox.

  2. 2.

    For instance, the fmincon function from the Matlab© Optimization Toolbox.

References

  1. Bonissone P, Subbu R, Lizzi J (2009) Multicriteria decision making (MCDM): a framework for research and applications. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 4(3):48–61

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coello CAC, Lamont GB (2004) Applications of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In: Advances in natural computation, vol 1. World Scientific Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coello CAC, Veldhuizen DV, Lamont G (2002) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. Kluwer Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Das I, Dennis J (1998) Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the pareto surface in non-linear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J Optim 8:631–657

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) State of the art surveys. Springer international series. Multiple criteria decision analysis

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fleming P, Purshouse R (2002) Evolutionary algorithms in control systems engineering: a survey. Control Eng Practi 10:1223–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lotov A, Miettinen K (2008) Visualizing the pareto frontier. In: Branke J, Deb K, Miettinen K, Slowinski R (eds) Multiobjective optimization vol 5252 of Lecture Notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–243

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marler R, Arora J (2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 26:369–395

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mattson CA, Messac A (2005) Pareto frontier based concept selection under uncertainty, with visualization. Optim Eng 6:85–115

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Messac A, Ismail-Yahaya A, Mattson C (2003) The normalized normal constraint method for generating the pareto frontier. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 25:86–98

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Miettinen KM (1998) Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reynoso-Meza G, Blasco X, Sanchis J (2012) Optimización evolutiva multi-objetivo y selección multi-criterio para la ingeniería de control. In: X Simposio CEA de Ingeniería de Control (March 2012), Comité Español de Automática, pp 80–87

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruzika S, Wiecek M (2009) Successive approach to compute the bounded pareto front of practical multiobjective optimization problems. SIAM J Optim 20:915–934

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Saridakis K, Dentsoras A (2008) Soft computing in engineering design - a review. Adv Eng Inf 22(2):202–221. Network methods in engineering

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reynoso Meza, G., Blasco Ferragud, X., Sanchis Saez, J., Herrero Durá, J.M. (2017). Motivation: Multiobjective Thinking in Controller Tuning. In: Controller Tuning with Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 85. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41301-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41301-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41299-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41301-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics