Abstract
Companion robots designed for PWD need to be customised to meet individual needs if they are to be perceived as useful and acceptable. This paper presents a brief review of the literature on the usefulness of robots for people with dementia; it also includes an overview of the ethical considerations that inform robot development and a description of a qualitative study which describes how people with dementia and other key stakeholders helped to design and shape this robot. An overview of the unique aspect of the MARIO robot and the scientific impact of this work is also presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Prince, M., Guerchet, M., Prina, M.: Policy Brief for Heads of Government. The Global Impact of Dementia 2013–2050. In: Alzheimer’s Disease International, London (2013)
Kane, M., Cook, L.: Dementia 2013 The Hidden Voice of Loneliness. In: Alzheimer’s Society, London (2013)
Moyle, W., Cooke, M., Beattie, E., Jones, C., Klein, B., Cook, G., Gray, C.: Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older adults with dementia. A pilot randomized controlled trial. J. Geriatr. Nurs. 39, 46–53 (2013)
Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walter, M., Koay, K., Werry, I.: What is a robot companion – friend, assistant or butler. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and System, IROS, Edmonton, Canada (2005)
Chang, W.L., Sabanovic, S., Huber, L.: Use of seal-like robot PARO in sensory group therapy for older adults with dementia. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/LEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 101–102. IEEE Press (2013)
Klein, B., Cook, G.: Emotional robotics in elder care – a comparison of findings in the UK and Germany. In: Ge, S.S., Khatib, O., Cabibihan, J.-J., Simmons, R., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) ICSR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7621, pp. 108–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Sung, H.C., Chang, S.M., Chin, M.Y., Lee, W.L.: Robot-assisted therapy for improving social interactions and activity participation among institutionalized older adults. A pilot study. Asia-Pac. Psychiatry 7, 1–5 (2015)
Takayanagi, K., Kirita, T., Shibata, T.: Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot. PARO. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6(257), 1–5 (2014)
Wada, K., Shibata, T., Kawaguchi, Y.: Long-term robot therapy in a health service facility for the aged - a case study for 5 years. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 1 and 2, pp. 1084–1087 (2009)
Marx, M.S., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Regier, N.G., Dakheel-Ali, M., Srihari, A., Thein, K.: The impact of different dog-related stimuli on engagement of persons with dementia. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Dement. 25, 37–45 (2010)
Kramer, S.C., Friedmann, E., Bernstein, P.L.: Comparison of the effect of human interaction, animal-assisted therapy, and AIBO-assisted therapy on long-term care residents with dementia. Anthrozoos 22, 43–57 (2009)
Furuta, Y., Kanoh, M., Shimizu, T., Shimizu, M., Makamuara, T.: Subjective evaluation of use of Babyloid for doll therapy. In: IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, WCCI, Brisbane Australia (2012)
Tapus, A., Vieru, A.-M.: Robot cognitive stimulation for the elderly. In: Ferrández Vicente, J.M., Álvarez Sánchez, J.R., de la Paz López, F., Toledo Moreo, F. (eds.) IWINAC 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7930, pp. 94–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Moyle, W., Jones, C., Cooke, M., O’Dwyer, S., Sung, B., Drummond, S.: Connecting the person with dementia and family, a feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC Geriatr. 14, 7 (2014)
de Graaf, M., Allouch, S., Klamer, T.: Sharing a life with Harvey: exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 1–14 (2015)
Stafford, R.: The contribution of people’s attitudes and perceptions to the acceptance of eldercare robots. The University of Auckland (2013)
Pino, M., Boulay, M., Jouen, F., Rigaud, A.S.: “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7(141), 1–15 (2015)
Mitzner, T.L., Chen, T.L., Kemp, C.C., Rogers, W.A.: Identifying the potential for robotics to assist older adults in different living environments. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6(2), 213–227 (2014)
Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 361–375 (2010)
Hawkey, K., Inkpen, K., Rockwood, K., McAllister, M, Slonim, J.: Requirements gathering with Alzheimer,s patients and caregivers. In: 7th International ACM SIGAACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 142–149. ACM, Baltimore, USA (2005)
Saaskilahti, K., Kangaskorte, R., Pieska, S., Jauhiainen, J., Luimula, M.: Needs and user acceptance of older adults for mobile service robot. In: 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN, pp. 559–564. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Paris, France (2012)
Broadbent, R., Tamagawa, N., Kerse, B., Knock, A.: Retirement home staff and residents’ preferences for healthcare robots. In: 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Communication, pp, 645–650. IEEE (2009)
Frennert, S., Eftring, H., Östlund, B.: Older people’s involvement in the development of a social assistive robot. In: Herrmann, G., Pearson, M.J., Lenz, A., Bremner, P., Spiers, A., Leonards, U. (eds.) ICSR 2013. LNCS, vol. 8239, pp. 8–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Kerssens, C., Kumar, R., Adams, A.E., Knott, C.C., Matalenas, L., Sanford, J.A., Rogers, W.A.: Personalized technology to support older adults with and without cognitive impairment living at home. Am. J. Alzheimer Dis. Dement. 30, 85–97 (2015)
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., Warshaw, P.: User acceptance of computer technology. A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)
van Wynsberghe, A.: Healthcare Robots: Ethics, Design, and Implementation. Routledge, London (2015)
van Wynsberghe, A.: Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design. Sci. Eng. Ethics 19, 407–433 (2013)
Sorell, T., Draper, H.: Robot carers, ethics, and older people. Ethics Inf. Technol. 16, 183–195 (2014)
Sparrow, R., Sparrow, L.: In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind. Mach. 16, 141–161 (2006)
Vallor, S.: Carebots and caregivers: sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century. Philos. Technol. 24, 251–268 (2011)
Pearson, Y., Borenstein, J.: Creating “companions” for children: the ethics of designing esthetic features for robots. AI & Soc. 29, 23–31 (2014)
Sharkey, A.: Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics Inf. Technol. 16, 63–75 (2014)
Sharkey, A., Sharkey, N.: Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf. Technol. 14, 27–40 (2012)
Murphy, K., Jordan, F., Hunter, A., Cooney, A., Casey, D.: Articulating the strategies for maximising the inclusion of people with dementia in qualitative research studies. Dement. Int. J. Soc. Res. Pract. 14, 800–824 (2015)
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Horizons 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020) under grant agreement 643808 Project MARIO “Managing active and healthy aging with use of caring service robots”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Casey, D. et al. (2016). What People with Dementia Want: Designing MARIO an Acceptable Robot Companion. In: Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9758. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41263-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41264-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)