Skip to main content

What People with Dementia Want: Designing MARIO an Acceptable Robot Companion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2016)

Abstract

Companion robots designed for PWD need to be customised to meet individual needs if they are to be perceived as useful and acceptable. This paper presents a brief review of the literature on the usefulness of robots for people with dementia; it also includes an overview of the ethical considerations that inform robot development and a description of a qualitative study which describes how people with dementia and other key stakeholders helped to design and shape this robot. An overview of the unique aspect of the MARIO robot and the scientific impact of this work is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Prince, M., Guerchet, M., Prina, M.: Policy Brief for Heads of Government. The Global Impact of Dementia 2013–2050. In: Alzheimer’s Disease International, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kane, M., Cook, L.: Dementia 2013 The Hidden Voice of Loneliness. In: Alzheimer’s Society, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moyle, W., Cooke, M., Beattie, E., Jones, C., Klein, B., Cook, G., Gray, C.: Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older adults with dementia. A pilot randomized controlled trial. J. Geriatr. Nurs. 39, 46–53 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walter, M., Koay, K., Werry, I.: What is a robot companion – friend, assistant or butler. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and System, IROS, Edmonton, Canada (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, W.L., Sabanovic, S., Huber, L.: Use of seal-like robot PARO in sensory group therapy for older adults with dementia. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/LEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 101–102. IEEE Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein, B., Cook, G.: Emotional robotics in elder care – a comparison of findings in the UK and Germany. In: Ge, S.S., Khatib, O., Cabibihan, J.-J., Simmons, R., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) ICSR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7621, pp. 108–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Sung, H.C., Chang, S.M., Chin, M.Y., Lee, W.L.: Robot-assisted therapy for improving social interactions and activity participation among institutionalized older adults. A pilot study. Asia-Pac. Psychiatry 7, 1–5 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Takayanagi, K., Kirita, T., Shibata, T.: Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot. PARO. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6(257), 1–5 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Kawaguchi, Y.: Long-term robot therapy in a health service facility for the aged - a case study for 5 years. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 1 and 2, pp. 1084–1087 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marx, M.S., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Regier, N.G., Dakheel-Ali, M., Srihari, A., Thein, K.: The impact of different dog-related stimuli on engagement of persons with dementia. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Dement. 25, 37–45 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kramer, S.C., Friedmann, E., Bernstein, P.L.: Comparison of the effect of human interaction, animal-assisted therapy, and AIBO-assisted therapy on long-term care residents with dementia. Anthrozoos 22, 43–57 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Furuta, Y., Kanoh, M., Shimizu, T., Shimizu, M., Makamuara, T.: Subjective evaluation of use of Babyloid for doll therapy. In: IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, WCCI, Brisbane Australia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tapus, A., Vieru, A.-M.: Robot cognitive stimulation for the elderly. In: Ferrández Vicente, J.M., Álvarez Sánchez, J.R., de la Paz López, F., Toledo Moreo, F. (eds.) IWINAC 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7930, pp. 94–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Moyle, W., Jones, C., Cooke, M., O’Dwyer, S., Sung, B., Drummond, S.: Connecting the person with dementia and family, a feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC Geriatr. 14, 7 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Graaf, M., Allouch, S., Klamer, T.: Sharing a life with Harvey: exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 1–14 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stafford, R.: The contribution of people’s attitudes and perceptions to the acceptance of eldercare robots. The University of Auckland (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pino, M., Boulay, M., Jouen, F., Rigaud, A.S.: “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7(141), 1–15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitzner, T.L., Chen, T.L., Kemp, C.C., Rogers, W.A.: Identifying the potential for robotics to assist older adults in different living environments. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6(2), 213–227 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 361–375 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hawkey, K., Inkpen, K., Rockwood, K., McAllister, M, Slonim, J.: Requirements gathering with Alzheimer,s patients and caregivers. In: 7th International ACM SIGAACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 142–149. ACM, Baltimore, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saaskilahti, K., Kangaskorte, R., Pieska, S., Jauhiainen, J., Luimula, M.: Needs and user acceptance of older adults for mobile service robot. In: 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN, pp. 559–564. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Paris, France (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Broadbent, R., Tamagawa, N., Kerse, B., Knock, A.: Retirement home staff and residents’ preferences for healthcare robots. In: 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Communication, pp, 645–650. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frennert, S., Eftring, H., Östlund, B.: Older people’s involvement in the development of a social assistive robot. In: Herrmann, G., Pearson, M.J., Lenz, A., Bremner, P., Spiers, A., Leonards, U. (eds.) ICSR 2013. LNCS, vol. 8239, pp. 8–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerssens, C., Kumar, R., Adams, A.E., Knott, C.C., Matalenas, L., Sanford, J.A., Rogers, W.A.: Personalized technology to support older adults with and without cognitive impairment living at home. Am. J. Alzheimer Dis. Dement. 30, 85–97 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., Warshaw, P.: User acceptance of computer technology. A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van Wynsberghe, A.: Healthcare Robots: Ethics, Design, and Implementation. Routledge, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. van Wynsberghe, A.: Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design. Sci. Eng. Ethics 19, 407–433 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sorell, T., Draper, H.: Robot carers, ethics, and older people. Ethics Inf. Technol. 16, 183–195 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sparrow, R., Sparrow, L.: In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind. Mach. 16, 141–161 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vallor, S.: Carebots and caregivers: sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century. Philos. Technol. 24, 251–268 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pearson, Y., Borenstein, J.: Creating “companions” for children: the ethics of designing esthetic features for robots. AI & Soc. 29, 23–31 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharkey, A.: Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics Inf. Technol. 16, 63–75 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharkey, A., Sharkey, N.: Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf. Technol. 14, 27–40 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Murphy, K., Jordan, F., Hunter, A., Cooney, A., Casey, D.: Articulating the strategies for maximising the inclusion of people with dementia in qualitative research studies. Dement. Int. J. Soc. Res. Pract. 14, 800–824 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Horizons 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020) under grant agreement 643808 Project MARIO “Managing active and healthy aging with use of caring service robots”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dympna Casey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Casey, D. et al. (2016). What People with Dementia Want: Designing MARIO an Acceptable Robot Companion. In: Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9758. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41263-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41264-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics