Skip to main content

Rights to Public Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rights to Public Space
  • 542 Accesses

Abstract

In Chapter 3 I develop the concepts of belonging and primitive property. I understand belonging as working in two ways. The first way is subject–object belonging, upon which standard ownership models are based: subjects possess objects. The second way is part-whole belonging: people are part of their culture, therefore they belong to it. Using this framework, I then further develop my concept of primitive property. Finally, I suggest that the concept of place centers on personhood, on cultural identity. As I argue in the subsequent chapters, legal definitions of nuisance align more closely with dominant Anglo cultural assumptions about legitimacy than with corresponding ideas of legitimacy in more marginal Latino cultural complexes. This rift is a central mechanism in the gentrification of space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amin, A. (2012). Land of strangers. Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, N. (1994). Law, space, and the geographies of power. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, N. (2002). Mud for the land. Public Culture, 14(3), 557–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, N. (2003). Law, property, and the Geography of violence: The frontier, the survey, and the grid. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, N. (2015). The territory of property. Progress in Human Geography, 1–17 (reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, N. (2016). The boundaries of property: Complexity, relationality, and spatiality. Law and Society Review, 50(1), 224–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2013). On anarchism. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. (2007). Opening up ownership: Community, belonging, belongings, and the productive life of property. Law and Social Inquiry, 32(3), 625–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2000). Magical urbanism: Latinos reinvent the US City. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, D. (2005). Barrio urbanism: Chicanos, planning, and American cities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frug, G., & Barron, D. (2014). City Bound: How states stifle urban innovation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatens, M., & Lloyd, G. (1999). Collective imaginings: Spinoza, past and present. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G. (2002). Ganging up on gangs: Anti-loitering and public nuisance laws. In R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America III (pp. 257–270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: WW Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, I. (2005). Transnational America: Feminisms, Diasporas, Neoliberalisms. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). The new imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, S. (2015). Subversive property: Law and the production of spaces of belonging. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langegger, Sig. (2016). After the ban: The moral economies of property. Antipode 48(3), 645–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1980 [1689]). Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, E. (2011). Rambunctious garden: Saving nature in a post-wild world. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. (2013). Phenomenology of Perception (Donald Landes, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1984). Places as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proudhon, Pierre Joseph. (1840). What is Property?: Public Domain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rios, M. (2010). Claiming Latino space: Cultural insurgency in the public realm. In J. Hou (Ed.), Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities (pp. 99–110). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1990). The conscience of the eye: The design and social life of cities. New York: WW Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. (2000). Entitlement: The paradoxes of property. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, S. (2013). Violent accumulation: A postanarchist critique of property, dispossession, and the state of exception in neoliberalizing Cambodia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(3), 608–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staeheli, L., & Mitchell, D. (2008). The people’s property?: Power, politics, and the public. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoehr, T. (Ed.) (2011). The Paul Goodman Reader. Oakland: PM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the modern self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. (Ed.) (1991). Hegel: Elements of the Philosophy of Right. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (2010). Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langegger, S. (2017). Rights to Public Space. In: Rights to Public Space. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41177-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41177-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41176-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41177-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics