Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Treatment for Congenital Femoral Deficiency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paediatric Orthopaedics

Abstract

Congenital femoral deficiency is a challenging paediatric orthopaedic problem that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Patients vary significantly in term of severity from a very mild form that does not require surgical intervention to complete absence of femur. Various surgical interventions have been reported in the literatures with variable success rates. Given the rarity of the condition, the wide spectrum of severity, the many surgical interventions that have been described and the recent evolution in surgical techniques, it has been difficult to recommend “the best treatment” for this condition. In this chapter, we critically reviewed the evidence behind the core principle of treating this challenging condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ring PA. Congenital short femur; simple femoral hypoplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1959;41-B(1):73–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aitken GT. Proximal femoral focal deficiency-definition, classification and management. In: Aitken GT, editor. Proximal femoral focal deficiency. A congenital anomalys Symposium held in Washington, June 13, 1968. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 1969. p. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paley D, Guardo F. Lengthening reconstruction surgery for congenital femoral deficiency. In: Advanced techniques in limb reconstruction surgery. Springer Science + Business Media. 2014. p. 245–299.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chomiak J et al. Cruciate ligaments in proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(1):21–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alshryda S, Jones S, Banaszkiewicz P. Postgraduate paediatric orthopaedics: the candidate’s guide to the FRCS (Tr and Orth) examination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Dhawale AA, Johari AN, Nemade A. Hip dislocation during lengthening of congenital short femur. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012;21(3):240–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Suzuki S et al. Dislocation and subluxation during femoral lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(3):343–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowen JR et al. Factors leading to hip subluxation and dislocation in femoral lengthening of unilateral congenital short femur. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(3):354–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalamchi A, Cowell HR, Kim KI. Congenital deficiency of the femur. J Pediatr Orthop. 1985;5(2):129–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Millis MB, Ahearn MC, Hall JE. Transiliac leg lengthening: experiences with a modified Salter osteotomy. Orthopade. 1990;19(5):283–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dora C et al. Morphologic characteristics of acetabular dysplasia in proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2004;13(2):81–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grill F, Dungl P. Lengthening for congenital short femur. Results of different methods. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11(6):812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aston WJS et al. Lengthening of the congenital short femur using the Ilizarov technique: a single-surgeon series. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91-B(7):962–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson E, Aparisi T. Missing cruciate ligament in congenital short femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(8):1109–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gillespie R, Torode IP. Classification and management of congenital abnormalities of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65(5):557–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones DC, Moseley CF. Subluxation of the knee as a complication of femoral lengthening by the Wagner technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67(1):33–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prince, D.E., et al., Lengthening with external fixation is effective in congenital femoral deficiency. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  18. O’Carrigan T, Paley D, Herzenberg JE. Obstacles in limb lengthening: fractures. In: Rozbruch SR, Ilizarov S, editors. Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Surgery. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007. p. 675–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kant P et al. Treatment of longitudinal deficiency affecting the femur: Comparing patient mobility and satisfaction outcomes of syme amputation against extension prosthesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23(2):236–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kantor R, Salai M, Ganel A. Orthopaedic long term aspects of bladder exstrophy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;335:240–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brown KL. Resection, rotationplasty, and femoropelvic arthrodesis in severe congenital femoral deficiency. A report of the surgical technique and three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(1):78–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Nes CP. Rotation-plasty for congenital defects of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg B. 1950;32-B:12–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hamel J, Winkelmann W, Becker W. A new modification of rotationplasty in a patient with proximal femoral focal deficiency Pappas type II. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1999;8(3):200–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Steel HH, Lin PS, Betz RR. Iliofemoral fusion for proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8(1):120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alman BA, Krajbich JI, Hubbard S. Proximal femoral focal deficiency: results of rotationplasty and Syme amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(12):1876–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fowler EG et al. Contrasts in Gait mechanics of individuals with proximal femoral focal deficiency: syme amputation versus Van Nes rotational osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19(6):720.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fowler E et al. Energy expenditure during walking by children who have proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(12):1857–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ackman J et al. Long-term follow-up of Van Nes rotationplasty in patients with congenital proximal focal femoral deficiency. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2013;95-B(2):192–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fowler EG et al. Contrasts in gait mechanics of individuals with proximal femoral focal deficiency: Syme amputation versus Van Nes rotational osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19(6):720–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Cooper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooper, A., Fernandes, J.A. (2017). Evidence-Based Treatment for Congenital Femoral Deficiency. In: Alshryda, S., Huntley, J., Banaszkiewicz, P. (eds) Paediatric Orthopaedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41142-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41142-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41140-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41142-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics