Skip to main content

Reconstruction of Physics Objects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

Abstract

This chapter describes the reconstruction of the main physics objects that are relevant for the analyses presented in this dissertation. The identification, reconstruction and calibration of electrons, muons, jets, b-jets and missing transverse energy is discussed in detail. A brief description of the systematic uncertainties associated with these physics objects is also included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The beam spot is defined as the spatial region around the interaction point where the profiles of the two beams overlap.

  2. 2.

    A jet is considered isolated when no other jet with \(p_{\mathrm {T}}> 7\,\mathrm{GeV}\) is found within a cone of radius \(\Delta R = 2.5 R\), where \(R = 0.4\) is the jet radius.

  3. 3.

    The reconstructed jets from the MC simulations are already calibrated with the LCW+JES scheme, which restores the reconstructed jet energy to that of the particle-level jet in the simulation.

  4. 4.

    The notation semileptonic is used to denote any decay chain of the type: \(B \rightarrow X+\mu +\nu _{\mu }\). Decays in the electron channel don’t require a special treatment since the electron energy is deposited in the calorimeter and clustered into the jet.

  5. 5.

    The decay length is divided by its error to obtain the decay length significance, \(L/\sigma _L\), in order to reduce the effect of poorly-measured vertices.

  6. 6.

    Dedicated algorithms to identify c-jets are also available [22]. In the context of this dissertation, c-tagging refers to mistakenly b-tagging a c-jet.

References

  1. Cornelissen T, Elsing M, Fleischmann S, Liebig W, Moyse E, Salzburger A (2007) Concepts, design and implementation of the ATLAS new tracking (NEWT), ATL-SOFT-PUB-2007-007

    Google Scholar 

  2. ATLAS collaboration (2010) Performance of primary vertex reconstruction in proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=\)7 TeV in the ATLAS experiment, ATLAS-CONF-2010-069

    Google Scholar 

  3. ATLAS collaboration (2014) Electron reconstruction and identification efficiency measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2011 LHC proton-proton collision data. Eur Phys J C 74:2941. arXiv:1404.2240 [hep-ex]

  4. Lampl W, Laplace S, Lelas D, Loch P, Ma H et al (2008) Calorimeter clustering algorithms: description and performance, ATL-LARG-PUB-2008-002

    Google Scholar 

  5. ATLAS collaboration, Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using LHC Run 1 data. arXiv:1407.5063 [hep-ex]

  6. ATLAS collaboration, Electron efficiency measurements for 2012 and 2011 data, ATL-COM-PHYS-2013-1287

    Google Scholar 

  7. ATLAS collaboration, Object selection and calibration, background estimations and MC samples for top quark analyses using the full 2012 data set, ATL-COM-PHYS-2013-1016

    Google Scholar 

  8. ATLAS collaboration (2014) Measurement of the muon reconstruction performance of the ATLAS detector using 2011 and 2012 LHC proton-proton collision data. Eur Phys J C 74:3130. arXiv:1407.3935 [hep-ex]

  9. ATLAS collaboration, Object selection and calibration, background estimations and MC samples for the winter 2013 top quark analyses with 2012 data, ATL-COM-PHYS-2013-088

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cacciari M, Salam GP, Soyez G (2008) The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm. JHEP 0804:063 arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Salam GP (2010) Towards Jetography. Eur Phys J C 67:637 arXiv:0906.1833 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. ATLAS collaboration (2013) Jet energy measurement with the ATLAS detector in proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV. Eur Phys J C 73:2304. arXiv:1112.6426 [hep-ex]

  13. ATLAS collaboration (2013) Pile-up subtraction and suppression for jets in ATLAS, ATLAS-CONF-2013-083

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cacciari M, Salam GP, Soyez G (2008) The catchment area of jets. J High Energy Phys 04. arXiv:0802.1188

  15. ATLAS collaboration (2015) Jet energy measurement and its systematic uncertainty in proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. Eur Phys J C 75:17. arXiv:1406.0076 [hep-ex]

  16. ATLAS collaboration (2013) Single hadron response measurement and calorimeter jet energy scale uncertainty with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Eur Phys J C 73(3):2305. arXiv:1203.1302 [hep-ex]

  17. ATLAS collaboration, Flavour dependence of jet response and quark/gluon tagging, ATLAS-CONF-2012-138

    Google Scholar 

  18. ATLAS collaboration, Jet energy measurement and systematic uncertainties using tracks for jets and for b-quark jets produced in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\) TeV in the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-002

    Google Scholar 

  19. ATLAS collaboration (2015) Data-driven determination of the energy scale and resolution of jets reconstructed in the ATLAS calorimeters using dijet and multijet events at \(\sqrt{s}=8\) TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2015-017

    Google Scholar 

  20. ATLAS collaboration (2011) Commissioning of the ATLAS high-performance b-tagging algorithms in the \(\sqrt{s} = 7\) TeV collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2011-102

    Google Scholar 

  21. ATLAS collaboration (2008) A new inclusive secondary vertex algorithm for b-jet tagging in ATLAS. J Phys Conf Ser 119:032032

    Google Scholar 

  22. ATLAS collaboration (2015) Performance and calibration of the jet fitter charm algorithm for c-jet identification, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-001

    Google Scholar 

  23. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the b-tag efficiency in a sample of jets containing muons with 5 fb\(^{-1}\) of data from the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-043

    Google Scholar 

  24. ATLAS collaboration, Calibration of b-tagging using dileptonic top pair events in a combinatorial likelihood approach with the ATLAS experiment, ATL-COM-PHYS-2014-0.04

    Google Scholar 

  25. ATLAS collaboration, b-jet tagging calibration on c-jets containing D* mesons, ATLAS-CONF-2012-039

    Google Scholar 

  26. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the mistag rate of \(b\)-tagging algorithms with 5 fb\(^{-1}\) of data collected by the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-040

    Google Scholar 

  27. ATLAS collaboration (2013) Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in ATLAS studied in proton–proton collisions recorded in 2012 at 8 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2013-082

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Montejo Berlingen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Montejo Berlingen, J. (2016). Reconstruction of Physics Objects. In: Search for New Physics in tt ̅ Final States with Additional Heavy-Flavor Jets with the ATLAS Detector. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41051-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics