Abstract
The book concludes by reviewing the primary findings on Smart Growth entrepreneurs. Smart Growth may be feasible with partnerships between public and private agents, considerate planning, and a flexible approach to development. The most successful projects in both Oregon and California shared these characteristics. Smart Growth, however, is still subject to broader property market patterns. For cities to develop sustainably, they must cast aside simplistic ideologies and embrace experimentation and innovation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Grant, J., & Perrott, K. (2011). Where is the Café? The Challenge of Making Retail Uses Viable in Mixed-use Suburban Developments. Urban Studies, 48 (1), 177–195.Gyourko, J., & Rybczynski, W. (2000). Financing new urbanism projects: Obstacles and solutions. Housing Policy Debate, 11(3), 733–750.
Passell, A. (2013). Building the new urbanism: Places, professions, and profits in the American metropolitan landscape. New York: Routledge.
Semeuls, A. (2016). Can Portland avoid repeating San Francisco’s mistakes? The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/05/the-real-roots-of-portlands-housing-crisis/482988/
Weinberger, J. (2015). Construction permit uptick signals growth in Gresham. Portland Tribune. Retrieved March, 2016, from http://portlandtribune.com/go/42-news/279177-154705-construction-permit-uptick-signals-growth-in-gresham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nielsen, E.S. (2017). Conclusion. In: Smart Growth Entrepreneurs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41027-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41027-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41026-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41027-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)