Skip to main content

Materials and Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 285 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research ((AAHER))

Abstract

This chapter deals mainly with the materials and different methods used in the present study in order to establish the facts and figures of river health of the river Haora. 1932, SOI topographical maps (scale 1:63,360), 1956 US Army topographical map (scale 1:250,000) and recent Google image (2005) have been decoded, referenced and digitised using ARC GIS (v 9.3) software to detect the spatio-temporal changes (gradual changes in channel positions in different years) of the river course. For the study of population growth, Indian Census data for the period of 1981–2011 have been used. Location of brick fields has been demarcated with the help of GPS. Soil erosion of the basin has been estimated on the basis of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, and the amount of sediment yield has been estimated by multiplying bank erosivity and bank erodibility. Water samples collected from the field have been tested in the laboratory in order to find the amount of pollutants in the river water. River course change, USLE, sediment yield, bank erosion zonation, water quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson E (1995) Methods for assessing sediment delivery in river systems. Hydrol Sci J 40(2):273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur KC (2008) Mapping soil erosion susceptibility using remote sensing and GIS: a case of the Upper Nam Wa Watershed, Nan Province, Thailand. Environ Geol 57:695–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (1996) A discussion of distributed modelling. In: Abbott MB, Refsgaard JC (eds) Distributed hydrological modelling. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 255–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas S, Sudhakar S, Desai VR (1999) Prioritization of subwatersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin by remote sensing and GIS approach. Photonirvachak 27:155–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary RS, Sharma PD (1998) Erosion hazard assessment and treatment prioritization of Giri river catchment, North western Himalayas. Indian J Soil Conserv 26:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabral PP, Baithuri N, Pandey A (2008) Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of north eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resource Manage 22:1783–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) (1994) Cell based modelling with GRID. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, California, USA, pp 127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Minacapilli M (1995) Sediment delivery processes at basin scale. Hydrol Sci J 40(6):703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Porto P, Tusa G (1998) Testing a distributed approach for modelling sediment delivery. Hydrol Sci J 43(3):425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan CT, Barfield BJ, Hayes JC (1994) Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. Academic, New York, pp 28–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvem A, Topaloglu F, Uygur V (2007) Estimating spatial distribution of soil loss over Seyhan River Basin in Turkey. J Hydrol 336:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Goel MK (2002) Assessing the vulnerability to soil erosion of the Ukai Dam catchments using remote sensing and GIS. Hydrol Sci 47:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JB, Saunders P, Finn JT (2005) Rapid assessment of soil erosion in the Rio Lempa Basin, Central America, using the Universal Soil Loss Equation and geographic information systems. Environ Manag 36(6):872–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothyari UC, Jain SK (1997) Sediment yield estimation using GIS. Hydrol Sci J 42(6):833–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maidment DR (1994) Digital delineation of watersheds and stream networks in the Allegheny basin. In: Prepared for Hydrology Engineering Centre, Davis, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool DK, Foster GR, Mutchler CK, Meyer LD (1987) Revised slope steepness factor for the universal Soil Loss Equation. Trans ASAE 30(5):1387–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhangara P, Kakembo V, Lim KJ (2012) Soil erosion risk assessment of the Keiskamma catchment, South Africa using GIS and remote sensing. Environ Earth Sci 65:2087–2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward AA, Mersey JE (1999) Adapting the RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in a mountainous tropical watershed. Catena 38(2):109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mkhonta MM (2000) Use of remote sensing and Geographical information System (GIS) on soil erosion assessment in the Gwayimane and Mahhuku catchment areas with special attention on soil erodobility(K –Factor). ITC, Enschede, pp 168–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao VV, Chakravarty AK, Sharma U (1994) Watershed prioritization based on sediment yield modelling and IRS-1A LISS data. Asian Pac Remote Sens J 6(2):59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudraiah M, Govindaiah S, Vittala SS (2008) Morphometry using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the sub-basins of Kagna River Basin, Gulburga District, Karnataka, India. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 36:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCS (Soil Conservation Service) (1975). Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical release no. 55, Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA, pp 55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Rambabu VV, Chandra S (1981) Soil loss prediction research in India. ICAR Bull. T12/ D9, CSWCTRI, Dehradun, India, pp 81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Yin ZY (1998) A comparison of drainage networks derived from digital elevation models at two scales. J Hydrol 210:221–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smit DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion loss: a guide to conservation planning., US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC, Agricultural handbook no. 537, pp 1–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Luukkanen O, Tokola T, Nieminen J (2000) Effect of vegetation cover on soil erosion in a mountainous watershed. Catena 75:319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bandyopadhyay, S., De, S.K. (2017). Materials and Methods. In: Human Interference on River Health. Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41018-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics