Abstract
In Chapter 5, fear is assessed in the publications of Mearsheimer. This inquiry illustrates that his discussions about fear revolves around threat inflations and its endemic character. In Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, fear is primarily considered in relation to issues such as anarchy, uncertainty, survival and capabilities, as well as aggression in the form of security competition and war. Many of these issues reappear in his fear-based empirical analysis of international politics along with other subjects such as lying, demography, secrecy, cooperation and buck-passing, among others.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Mearsheimer 2011c, 21–22, 46, 59, 61–62, 90–91.
- 2.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 33.
- 3.
See, ibid., 42–45.
- 4.
Ibid., 5, 15, 19–22.
- 5.
Mearsheimer however abandons his unitary actor’s assumption in practice. See, Pashakhanlou, “Back to the Drawing Board,” 216–217.
- 6.
Mearsheimer 2006c, 231.
- 7.
Ibid.
- 8.
Mearsheimer 2009a.
- 9.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 17, 422 60. Special attention is afforded to great powers as they have the largest impact on international events and shape the world in their own image. Mearsheimer claims that there is a prescriptive element to his theory as well as “[s]tates should behave according to the dictates of offensive realism, because it outlines the best way to survive in a dangerous world.” Ibid., 11, emphasis in original.
- 10.
Mearsheimer 2006b, 112, 122.
- 11.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 32. As we will see in later parts of this chapter, Mearsheimer is actually inconsistent on which of his five assumptions that are needed to bring about fear in his offensive realism.
- 12.
Mearsheimer 2006b, 112, 122.
- 13.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 55–56, 60–61.
- 14.
Mearsheimer 2004b, 184–187.
- 15.
Ibid.
- 16.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 147–150.
- 17.
Ibid., 152–153.
- 18.
Mearsheimer, Tragedy, p. 155.
- 19.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 155–157.
- 20.
Ibid., 157–159.
- 21.
Just as in Waltz’s defensive realism, unipolarity is heavily under-theorized in Mearsheimer’s offensive realism. Again, unipolarity also undermines the explanatory power of Mearsheimer’s theory. See, Pashakhanlou 2014.
- 22.
Mearsheimer 2010b, 86–87.
- 23.
Ibid., 85–88.
- 24.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 29.
- 25.
Ibid., 30.
- 26.
- 27.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 17.
- 28.
- 29.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 5.
- 30.
Ibid., 32.
- 31.
- 32.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 52 also see, 34, 46, 50, 361.
- 33.
- 34.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 334, chapter 9.
- 35.
Barkin 2010, 128.
- 36.
- 37.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 42.
- 38.
Ibid., 345.
- 39.
Ibid., 32.
- 40.
Ibid., 42.
- 41.
- 42.
- 43.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 32.
- 44.
Ibid., 43.
- 45.
Mearsheimer 2006a, 160.
- 46.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 361.
- 47.
- 48.
- 49.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 31–32.
- 50.
Ibid., xi.
- 51.
Ibid., 345.
- 52.
Ibid., 2.
- 53.
Ibid., 32.
- 54.
Ibid., 42–43.
- 55.
Ibid., 43.
- 56.
Ibid., 44.
- 57.
Ibid.
- 58.
Ibid., 44–45, 338, 346.
- 59.
A potential hegemon is a states that has “the most formidable army as well as the most latent power among all the states located in its region” by a relatively large margin. Ibid., 45.
- 60.
Ibid., 44–45.
- 61.
Mearsheimer 2006c, 232.
- 62.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 42–43.
- 63.
Ibid., 361.
- 64.
Ibid., 292.
- 65.
- 66.
Mearsheimer and Walt 2003b.
- 67.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 144, 188, 214, 297.
- 68.
Ibid., 117–118.
- 69.
Ibid., 43; Mearsheimer 2004, 187.
- 70.
Mearsheimer 1990b, 39.
- 71.
Mearsheimer 2006b, 120.
- 72.
Ibid., 117.
- 73.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 35.
- 74.
Ibid., 85.
- 75.
Ibid., 56.
- 76.
Ibid., 150.
- 77.
Mearsheimer 1990, 39.
- 78.
Mearsheimer 1984, 31 n. 31.
- 79.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 133.
- 80.
Ibid., 474 n. 78.
- 81.
Ibid., 177–178.
- 82.
Mearsheimer 2002b, 27.
- 83.
- 84.
Mearsheimer and Walt 2007, 281.
- 85.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 470 n. 45.
- 86.
Mearsheimer 1998b, 232.
- 87.
- 88.
Mearsheimer 2006b, 117.
- 89.
Mearsheimer 1998a.
- 90.
Mearsheimer 2011, 90.
- 91.
Mearsheimer 1993, 54.
- 92.
Ibid.; Mearsheimer 2010e, 396.
- 93.
Mearsheimer 2001a, 55–56.
- 94.
- 95.
Mearsheimer 1993, 59.
- 96.
Ibid., 53.
- 97.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 166.
- 98.
Mearsheimer and Walt 2007, 254.
- 99.
Mearsheimer 2011, 57.
- 100.
- 101.
Mearsheimer 2011, 31–33, 38, 45, 63–64, 67.
- 102.
Mearsheimer and Walt 2007, 87, 89–90, 217.
- 103.
Ibid., 76.
- 104.
Mearsheimer and Walt 2006b, 236.
- 105.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 292, 296.
- 106.
Ibid., 324; Mearsheimer and Walt 2007, 43.
- 107.
Mearsheimer and Walt 2007, 73.
- 108.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 125.
- 109.
Ibid., 177.
- 110.
Ibid., 340–341.
- 111.
Ibid., 474 n. 78.
- 112.
Ibid., 221.
- 113.
Ibid., 235.
- 114.
Mearsheimer 1998b, 229.
- 115.
Mearsheimer and Walt 2007, 43.
- 116.
Ibid., 254.
- 117.
Mearsheimer 1984, 26.
- 118.
Mearsheimer 2010c, 387.
- 119.
Mearsheimer 2010b, 91.
- 120.
Mearsheimer 1981b, 177.
- 121.
Pashakhanlou 2013.
- 122.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 46.
- 123.
Shaohua 2009.
- 124.
Sagan and Waltz 2003.
- 125.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 37.
- 126.
Mearsheimer 2006b, 122.
- 127.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 414 n. 7.
- 128.
Mearsheimer 2009, 244–246.
- 129.
- 130.
Öhman 2008, 709.
- 131.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 21.
- 132.
Ibid., 10.
- 133.
Ibid., 11.
- 134.
As has already been established, the alternative readings where only one or a few of the five assumptions are responsible for bringing about this emotion have already been dismissed.
- 135.
Waltz 1979a, 97–98.
- 136.
Mearsheimer 2001b, 10.
- 137.
Ibid., 358–359.
- 138.
Ibid., 126.
Bibliography
Al-Tamimi, Naser. 2013. China–Saudi Arabia Relations, 1990–2012: Marriage of Convenience or Strategic Alliance? New York: Routledge.
Barkin, Samuel. 2010. Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Chris. 2012. Tragedy, ‘Tragic Choices’ and Contemporary International Political Theory. In Tragedy and International Relations, eds. Toni Erskine and Richard Ned Lebow, 75–85. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davis, Carmel. 2011. Power, Threat, or Military Capabilities: US Balancing in the Later Cold War, 1970–1982. Plymouth: University Press of America.
Dierauer, Isabelle. 2013. Disequilibrium, Polarization, and Crisis Model: An International Relations Theory Explaining Conflict. Plymouth: University Press of America.
Fettweis, Christopher. 2010. Dangerous Times? The International Politics of Great Power Peace. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Geunwook Lee, Gerald. 2002. To be Long or not to be Long—That is the Question: The Contradiction of Time-Horizon in Offensive Realism. Security Studies 12 (2): 196–217.
Kydd, Andrew. 2005. Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lemke, Douglas. 2004. Great Powers in the Post-Cold War World: A Power Transition Perspective. In Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, eds. T. V. Paul, James Wirtz, and Michel Fortmann, 52–75. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Little, Richard. 2007. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mearsheimer, John. 1981b. The British Generals Talk: A Review Essay. International Security 6 (1): 165–184.
Mearsheimer, John. 1984. Nuclear Weapons and Deterrence in Europe. International Security 9 (3): 19–46.
Mearsheimer, John. 1990a. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security 15 (1): 5–56.
Mearsheimer, John. 1990b. Why We Will Soon Miss the Cold War. Atlantic Monthly 266 (2): 35–50.
Mearsheimer, John. 1993. The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent. Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 50–66.
Mearsheimer, John. 1995b. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3): 5–49.
Mearsheimer, John. 1998a. A Peace Agreement That’s Bound to Fail. New York Times 19.
Mearsheimer, John. 1998b. Here We Go Again. New York Times, sec. 4.
Mearsheimer, John. 2001a. Guns Won’t Win the Afghan War. New York Times.
Mearsheimer, John. 2001b. The Future of the American Pacifier. Foreign Affairs 80 (5): 46–61.
Mearsheimer, John. 2002b. Realism, the Real World, and the Academy. In Realism and Institutionalism in International Studies, eds. Michael Brecher and Frank Harvey, 23–33. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mearsheimer, John. (1904–2004). 2004b. Power and Fear in Great Power Politics. In One Hundred Year Commemoration to the Life of Hans Morgenthau, ed. G. O. Mazur, 184–196. New York: Semenenko Foundation.
Mearsheimer, John. 2005c. The Rise of China Will Not Be Peaceful At All. The Australian 18: 11.
Mearsheimer, John. 2006a. China’s Unpeaceful Rise. Current History 105 (690): 160–162.
Mearsheimer, John. 2006b. Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer (Part I). International Relations 20 (1): 105–123.
Mearsheimer, John. 2006c. Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer (Part II). International Relations 20 (2): 231–243.
Mearsheimer, John. 2009a. Reckless States and Realism. International Relations 23 (2): 241–256.
Mearsheimer, John. 2010a. Australians Should Fear the Rise of China. The Spectator 2.
Mearsheimer, John. 2010b. Israel’s Fated Bleak Future. Chicago Tribune.
Mearsheimer, John. 2010c. Sinking Ship. The American Conservative 10–12.
Mearsheimer, John. 2010d. Structural Realism. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, eds. Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, 77–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mearsheimer, John. 2010e. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (4): 381–396.
Mearsheimer, John. 2011a. Imperial by Design. Foreign Affairs 70 (111): 16–34.
Mearsheimer, John. 2011c. Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mearsheimer, John, and Stephen Walt. 2002. Can Saddam Be Contained? History Says Yes. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, International Security Program Occasional Paper. Cambridge. Available from http://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/mearsheimerwalt.pdf.
Mearsheimer, John, and Stephen Walt. 2003a. An Unnecessary War. Foreign Policy 134: 51–59.
Mearsheimer, John, and Stephen Walt. 2003b. Keeping Saddam Hussein in a Box. New York Times, sec. 4.
Mearsheimer, John, and Stephen Walt. 2006b. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Middle East Policy 13 (3): 29–87.
Mearsheimer, John, and Stephen Walt. 2007. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Öhman, Arne. 2008. Fear and Anxiety: Overlaps and Dissociations. In Handbook of Emotions, eds. Michael Lewis, Jeannette Haviland-Jones, and Lisa Barrett, 709–729. New York: The Guilford.
Pashakhanlou, Arash Heydarian. 2013. Back to the Drawing Board: A Critique of Offensive Realism. International Relations 27 (2): 202–225.
Pashakhanlou, Arash Heydarian. 2014. Waltz, Mearsheimer and the Post-Cold War World: The Rise of America and the Fall of Structural Realism. International Politics 51 (3): 295–315.
Phythian, Mark. 2011. The Problem of Intelligence Ethics. In War, Ethics and Justice: New Perspectives on a Post-9/11 World, eds. Annika Bergman-Rosamond and Mark Phythian, 128–149. New York: Routledge.
Rudolph, Lloyd, and Susanne Hoeber Rudolph. 2008. Making U.S. Foreign Policy Toward South Asia: Regional Imperatives and the Imperial Presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Schmidt, Brian. 2013. A Modest Realist in a Tragic World: John J. Mearsheimer’s The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. In Classics of International Relations: Essays in Criticism and Appreciation, eds. Henrik Bliddal, Casper Sylvest, and Peter Wilson, 230–239. New York: Routledge.
Shaohua, Yang. 2009. How Can Weak Powers Win? The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (3): 335–371.
Tang, Shiping. 2008. Fear in International Politics: Two Positions. International Studies Review 10 (3): 451–471.
Thayer, Bradley. 2004. Darwin and International Relations: On the Evolutionary Origins of War and Ethnic Conflict. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Wagner, Robert Harrison. 2007. War and the State: The Theory of International Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979a. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Waltz, Kenneth. 2003. Assaying Theories: Reflections on Imre Lakatos. In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, eds. Colin Elman and Miriam Elman, vii–xii. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wohlforth, William. 2010. Realism and Security Studies. In The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, eds. Myriam Dunn Cavelty and Victor Mauer, 9–20. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pashakhanlou, A.H. (2017). Mearsheimer and Fear. In: Realism and Fear in International Relations . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41012-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41012-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41011-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41012-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)