Advertisement

The Social Media Campaign: Mobilisation and Persuasion

  • Darren G. LillekerEmail author
  • Daniel Jackson
Chapter

Abstract

Darren Lilleker and Dan Jackson review the role and impact of the social media on the election now that these platforms have become a widely used and popular activity with a significant part of the British public and especially the younger voters. Developments in 2015 are placed in context of the fast moving interactive technological advancements, particularly relating to mobile phones, in recent years. The chapter explores how social media has been used in different ways by larger parties and their smaller rivals, the latter of whom are less well-resourced and therefore keen to exploit any possibilities afforded them. The contribution and significance of e-mail, Facebook and other websites to the campaign is considered along with survey data relating to users’ online related political participation.

Keywords

Social Medium Political Party Political Participation Vote Share Election Campaign 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1937). The functional autonomy of motives. The American Journal of Psychology, 50(1/4), 141–156.Google Scholar
  2. Anstead, N. (2015). Was this the ‘social media election’? We don’t know yet. In D. Jackson & E. Thorsen (Eds.), UK Election analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 44). Bournemouth: CSJCC Publishing.http://www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2015/section-6-social-media/was-this-the-social-media-election-we-dont-know-yet/
  3. Anstead, N., & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Social media analysis and public opinion: The 2010 UK General Election. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 204–220.Google Scholar
  4. BBC (2015). Will 2015 be the UK's first social media election?. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-31327154
  5. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blumer, H. (1948). Public opinion and public opinion polling. American Sociological Review, 13, 542–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, V., & Lee, B. (2015). Party Branding: A Case Study of Online Political Posters. In Lilleker, D. G., and Pack, M. (Eds.) Political Marketing and the 2015 UK General Election (pp. 49–65). London: Palgrave Macmillan, 49–66.Google Scholar
  9. Chadwick, A. (2011). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British prime minister and the ‘Bullygate’ affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Channel 4. (2015). Election 2015: Is this the first ‘social media’ campaign?. http://www.channel4.com/news/social-media-general-election-2015-youtube-facebook-twitter
  11. Denver, D., Hands, G., & MacAllister, I. (2004). The electoral impact of constituency campaigning in Britain, 1992–2001. Political Studies, 52, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, J. (2003). Voters and voting: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, J., Cutts, D., & Fieldhouse, E. (2011). The electoral effectiveness of constituency campaigning in the 2010 British general election: The ‘triumph’ of Labour? Electoral Studies, 30, 816–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Howard, P. N. (2006). New media campaigns and the managed citizen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, N. (2015). Online persuasion at the 2015 General Election. In D. Jackson & E. Thorsen (Eds.), UK Election Analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 46). Bournemouth: CSJCC Publishing.http://www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2015/political-communication-and-image-management/online-persuasion-at-the-2015-general-election/ Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, N. A., & Lilleker, D. G. (2007). Seeking unmediated political information in a mediated environment: The uses and gratifications of political parties’ e-newsletters. Information, Community and Society, 10, 242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson, N. A., & Lilleker, D. G. (2009). Building an architecture of participation? Political parties and Web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3–4), 232–250.Google Scholar
  20. Karpf, D. (2012). The MoveOn effect: The unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kreiss, D. (2012). Taking our country back: The crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lilleker, D. G. (2013). Empowering the citizens? Political communication, co production and the harnessed crowd. In R. Scullion, R. Gerodimos, D. Jackson, & D. Lilleker (Eds.), The media, political participation and empowerment (pp. 24–38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Lilleker, D. G. (2015). Re-imagining the meaning of participation for a digital age”, in Frame, A. and Brachotte, G. (eds), Forms and functions of political participation in a digital world. London: Routledge, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  24. Lilleker, D., & Jackson, N. (2011). Political campaigning, elections and the Internet: Comparing the US, UK, France and Germany. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Lilleker, D. G., & Jackson, N. (2014). Brand management and relationship marketing in online environments. In Lees-Marshment, J., Conley, B., & Cosgrove, K. (Eds.). Political marketing in the United States. New York Routledge. 165–184.Google Scholar
  26. Lilleker, D. G., Jackson, N. A., & Scullion, R. (2006). The marketing of political parties: Political marketing at the 2005 General Election. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lilleker, D. G., Jackson, N. A., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2016). “Social media in the UK election campaigns 2008–14: Experimentation, innovation and convergence”, in Bruns, A. and Skogerbo, E. (eds), Routledge companion to social media and politics. London: Routledge, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  28. Lilleker, D. G., Tenscher, J., & Štětka, V. (2015). Towards hypermedia campaigning? Perceptions of new media’s importance for campaigning by party strategists in comparative perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 747–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace revolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Mason, R. (2015). Labour raises £1m in Obama-style online fundraising drive. The Guardian, 19 February. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/19/labour-raises-1m-in-obama-style-online-fundraising-drive
  31. McKelvey, F. & Piebiak, J. (2014). Coding Good Technologies for Winning Campaigns: The Political Campaign Software Industry, as part of panel: Digital Campaigning and Political Organizations. International Political Science Association, 19–24 July, Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
  32. Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  33. Newman, N. (2015). Social sharing, mobile media and the Buzzfeedisation of news. In D. Jackson & E. Thorsen (Eds.), UK Election analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 78). Bournemouth: CSJCC Publishing.http://www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2015/section-6-social-media/social-sharing-mobile-media-and-the-buzzfeedisation-of-news/ Google Scholar
  34. Newman, N., Levy, D. A. and Nielsen, R. K. (2015). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015 (Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism), http://www.digitalnewsreport.org Google Scholar
  35. Nielsen, R. K. (2010). Mundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Coproduction of Citizenship in Political Campaigns. New Media & Society, 13, 755–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norris, P. (2003). Preaching to the converted? Pluralism, participation and party websites. Party politics, 9(1), 21–45.Google Scholar
  37. Ridge-Newman, A., & Mitchell, M. (2016). Digital political marketing and political participation. In D. G. Lilleker & M. Pack (Eds.), Political Marketing and the 2015 UK General Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic. com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Trevisan, F., & Reilly, P. (2015). UKIP: The web’s darling? In D. Jackson & E. Thorsen (Eds.), UK Election analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 76). Bournemouth: CSJCC Publishing http://www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2015/section-6-social-media/ukip-the-webs-darling/.Google Scholar
  40. Wright, S., Jackson, D., & Graham, T. (2016). Third space, social media and everyday politics. In A. Bruns & E. Skogerbo (Eds.), Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bournemouth UniversityBournemouthUK

Personalised recommendations