Advertisement

The Media Campaign: The Issues and Personalities Who Defined the Election

  • David Deacon
  • John Downey
  • James Stanyer
  • Dominic WringEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Loughborough University’s team provides a comprehensive study of how the major print and broadcast media covered the campaign. Based on content analysis of the main television bulletins as well as every national newspaper, the chapter explores how the various issues and personalities were represented. Aside from the traditional focus on ‘process’ the dominant substantive issues were the economy, taxation and constitutional situation, particularly relating to Scotland. This focus was reflected in the relative prominence of the rivals to be Chancellor and several politicians from north of the border. Broadly speaking the news media reporting - print and broadcast- reflected the increasingly fragmented party system in that both the SNP and UKIP received unprecedented amounts of coverage in a UK wide election. Most newspapers did, however, exhibit their support for the Conservatives in their more favourable and extensive treatment of the party in terms of both its policies and representatives.

Keywords

News Item Coalition Government News Coverage Major Party Press Coverage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beckett, C. (2016). The battle for the stage: Broadcasting. In P. Cowley & D. Kavanagh (Eds.), The British General Election of 2015 (pp. 278–301). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cowley, P., & Kavanagh, D. (2016). The British General Election of 2015. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deacon, D., & Wring, D. (2002). Partisan dealignment and the British Press. In J. Bartle, I. Crewe, & B. Gosschalk (Eds.), Political communications: The British General Election Campaign of 2001 (pp. 197–211). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  4. Deacon, D., Wring, D., & Golding, P. (2006). Same campaign, differing agendas: Analysing news media coverage of the 2005 General Election. British Politics, 1, 222–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deacon, D., & Wring, D. (2016). Still life in the old attack dogs: The press. In P. Cowley & D. Kavanagh (Eds.), The British General Election of 2015 (pp. 302–335). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Norris, P., Curtice, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M., & Semetko, H. (1999). On message: Communicating the campaign. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Wring, D., & Ward, S. (2015). Exit velocity: The media election. In A. Geddes & J. Tonge (Eds.), Britain votes 2015 (pp. 224–240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Deacon
    • 1
  • John Downey
    • 1
  • James Stanyer
    • 1
  • Dominic Wring
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Loughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations