Skip to main content

Why Read Informality in a Substantivist Manner? On the Embeddedness of the Soviet Second Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Informal Economy in Global Perspective

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

Existing literature tends to see informality in Soviet times as a rational response to deficient socialist institutions. In contrast, informality in post-socialist times is explained by the stickiness of culturally embedded norms. This chapter examines the reasons and implications for these inconsistent interpretations of Soviet and post-Soviet informality using the example of Georgia. It suggests that two influential schools of thought on post-Soviet informality, new institutionalist economics and economic sociology, both fail to overcome this theoretical inconsistency. The chapter then elaborates how a Polanyian substantivist approach can overcome identified theoretical pitfalls and establish continuity in interpreting socialist and post-socialist informality. The importance of recalling this seemingly forgotten substantivist approach is illustrated using the changing institutional context and reproduction of informality in the Georgian case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdih, M. Y., & Medina, L. (2013). Measuring the informal economy in the caucasus and central Asia (IMF Working paper no. 13/137). International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliyev, H. (2014). The effects of the saakashvili era reforms on informal practices in the republic of Georgia. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnardi, F. (2015). The changing pattern of social dialogue in Europe and the influence of ILO and EU: Georgian tripartism. CSSR 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, E. (2010). Post-soviet Georgia: The rocky path towards modern social protection. Presented at the social policy and the global crisis, the network for European social policy analysis ESPANET, Budapest, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, K. F. (2004). The informal economy (fact finding study no. SIDA3630en). Sida department for infrastructure and economic co-operation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (2007). The great transformation of embeddedness – Karl Polanyi and the new economic sociology (MPIfG Discussion paper no. 1/07). Max Planck institute for the study of societies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, P., & Dalton, G. (Eds.). (1965). Markets in Africa, Northwestern University (Evanston, Ill.) African studies. Garden City: Doubleday & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery, Cornell studies in political economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. (2011). Aid, institutions and governance: What have we learned? Development Policy Review, 29, s5–s26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2011.00518.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1999). The great involution: Russia’s response to the market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curro, C. (2015). Davabirzhaot! Conflicting claims on public space in Tbilisi between transparency and opaqueness. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35, 497–512. doi:10.1108/IJSSP-12-2014-0122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, G. (1968). Introduction, in: Primitive, archaic, and modern economies: Essays of KarlPolanyi. Garden City: Doubleday, p. ix–xlvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, H. (1989). The other path: The invisible revolution in the third world (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engvall, J. (2012). Against the grain: How Georgia fought corruption and what it means, silk road paper. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road studies program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, M. D. (2013). Good hearts or big bellies: Dzmak’atsoba and images of masculinity in the republic of Georgia. In V. Amit & N. Dyck (Eds.), Young men in uncertain times (pp. 165–187). New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for other worlds. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 613–632. doi:10.1177/0309132508090821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: the first 5,000 years. Brooklyn: Melville House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1992). The sociology of economic life. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudeman, S. (2009). Necessity or contingency: Mutuality and market. In C. M. Hann & K. Hart (Eds.), Market and society: The great transformation today (pp. 17–37). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gugushvili, D. (2014). Do the benefits of growth trickle-down to Georgia’s poor? A case for a strong welfare system (PhD in Social Policy). Kent, United Kingdom, University of Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Khasnobis, B., Kanbur, R., & Ostrom, E. (2006). Beyond formality and informality. In B. Guha-Khasnobis, R. Kanbur, & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Linking the formal and informal economy (pp. 1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haldar, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). Analyzing legal formality and informality: Lessons from land titling and microfinance programs1. In D. Kennedy & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Law and economics with Chinese characteristics (pp. 112–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hann, C. M., & Hart, K. (Eds.). (2009). Market and society: The great transformation today. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on politics null (pp. 725–740). doi: 10.1017/S1537592704040472.

  • Herskovits, M. J. (1952). Economic anthropology: A study in comparative economics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Kaufman, D., & Shleifer, A. (1997). The unofficial economy in transition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 28, 159–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1998). Regulatory discretion and the unofficial economy. American Economic Review, 88, 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. F. (2012). Reflections on the rose revolution. European Security, 21, 5–15. doi:10.1080/09662839.2012.656596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karjanen, D. (2014). When is an illicit taxi driver more than a taxi driver? Case studies from transit and trucking in post-socialist Slovakia. In J. Morris & A. Polese (Eds.), The informal post-socialist economy: Embedded practices and livelihoods (Routledge Contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe Series) (pp. 102–118). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khutsishvili, K. (2012). Bazaar culture in Georgia: Case of Tbilisi. In M. Krebs & M. Pilz (Eds.), Die Postsowjetische Stadt: Urbane Aushandlungsprozesse Im Südkaukasus (pp. 41–52). Berlin: Panama Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1992). The socialist system: The political economy of communism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kupatadze, A. (2012). Explaining Georgia’s anti-corruption drive. European Security, 21, 16–36. doi:10.1080/09662839.2012.656597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. (1998). Russia’s economy of favours: Blat, networking, and informal exchanges, Cambridge Russian, soviet and post-soviet studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. (2009). From Russia with “blat”: Can informal networks help modernize Russia? Social Research, 76, 257–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. (2007). Price adjustment under the table: Evidence on efficiency-enhancing corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 423–447. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2007.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loayza, N. (1999). The economics of the informal sector: A simple model and some empirical evidence from Latin America (Policy research working papers), The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, N. M. C. (2011). Karl Polanyi and the new economic sociology: Notes on the concept of (dis)embeddedness. RCCS Annual Review. A selection from the Portuguese journal Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, G., & Altman, Y. (1983). The cultural bases of soviet Georgia’s second economy. Soviet Studies, 35, 546–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (2011). Socially embedded workers at the nexus of diverse work in Russia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31, 619–631. doi:10.1108/01443331111177832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., & Polese, A. (Eds.). (2014a). The informal post-socialist economy: Embedded practices and livelihoods (Routledge contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe series). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., & Polese, A. (2014b). Informal health and education sector payments in Russian and Ukrainian cities: Structuring welfare from below. European Urban and Regional Studies. doi:10.1177/0969776414522081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., & Polese, A. (Eds.). (2015). Informal economies in post-socialist spaces: Practices, institutions and networks. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskhelishvili, M. (2011). Social dialogue in Georgia. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Tbilisi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskhelishvili, M., & Jorjoliani, G. (2009). Georgia’s ongoing struggle for a better future continued: Democracy promotion through civil society development. Democratization, 16, 682–708. doi:10.1080/13510340903083000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasritdinov, E., Rayapova, R., Kholmatova, N., Damirbek kyzy, E., & Igoshina, N. (2010). Informal economy and social vulnerability in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Social Research Center at American University of Central Asia and HelpAge International, Bishkek.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history (1st ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1995). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance, The Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piculescu, V., & Hibbs, J. (2005). Institutions, corruption and tax evasion in the unofficial economy (Report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation, Beacon paperbacks. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1968). Primitive, archaic, and modern economies: Essays of KarlPolanyi. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polese, A. (2014). Drinking with Vova: An individual entrepreneur between illegality and informality. In J. Morris & A. Polese (Eds.), The informal post-socialist economy: Embedded practices and livelihoods (Routledge Contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe Series) (pp. 85–101). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polese, A., Morris, J., Kovács, B., & Harboe, I. (2014). “Welfare states” and social policies in Eastern Europe and the former USSR: Where informality fits in? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22, 184–198. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.902368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rekhviashvili, L. (2013). Development and the role of the state: Visions of post-revolutionary Georgian government. Caucasus Social Science Review, 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekhviashvili, L. (2015). Marketization and the public-private divide. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35, 478–496. doi:10.1108/IJSSP-10-2014-0091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, P., & Williams, C. (2009). Guest editors’ introduction. International Journal of Sociology, 39, 3–11. doi:10.2753/IJS0020-7659390200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2004). Institutions and economic performancegetting institutions right (CESifo DICE report 2), p. 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (1998). Getting things done in an anti-modern society: Social capital networks in Russia (Working paper no. 6). Social Capital Initiative. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roti, M. (2014). Spheres of semi-legality: Discourse, media and informal economic practices in St. Petersburg, Russia (2000–Present). WSU Dissertations, Wayne State University Dissertations – Digital Commons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudaz. (2012). Entrepreneurship in Georgia. The Caucasus Analytical Digest, 45, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., Buehn, A., & Montenegro, C. E. (2010). Shadow economies all over the world: New estimates for 162 countries from 1999 to 2007 (Policy research working paper series no. 5356). The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Rochovská, A. (2007). Domesticating neo-liberalism: Everyday lives and the geographies of post-socialist transformations. Geoforum, Theme Issue: Geographies of Generosity, 38, 1163–1178. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Stenning, A. (2006). Beyond household economies: Articulations and spaces of economic practice in postsocialism. Progress in Human Geography, 30, 190–213. doi:10.1191/0309132506ph601oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, K. L. (2000). History lessons: Institutions, factor endowments, and paths of development in the new world [WWW document].

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, A., Smith, A., Rochovská, A., & Świątek, D. (2010). Domesticating neo-liberalism: Spaces of economic practice and social reproduction in post-socialist cities (1st ed.). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (2011). Taking capitalism seriously: Towards an institutionalist approach to contemporary political economy [WWW document].

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2012). Fighting corruption in public services, directions in developmentgeneral. The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, T. (2011). Shortage, fuzzy property and other dead ends in the anthropological analysis of (post)socialism. Critique of Anthropology, 31, 43–61. doi:10.1177/0308275X10393436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdery, K. (1999). Fuzzy property: Rights, power, and identity in Transylvania’s decollectivization. In M. Burawoy & K. Verdery (Eds.), Uncertain transition: Ethnographies of change in the postsocialist world (pp. 53–82). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (2004). The myth of marketization: An evaluation of the persistence of non-market activities in advanced economies. International Sociology, 19, 437–449. doi:10.1177/0268580904047366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (2005). Unraveling the meanings of underground work. Review of Social Economy, 63, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lela Rekhviashvili .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rekhviashvili, L. (2017). Why Read Informality in a Substantivist Manner? On the Embeddedness of the Soviet Second Economy. In: Polese, A., Williams, C., Horodnic, I., Bejakovic, P. (eds) The Informal Economy in Global Perspective. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40931-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics