Advertisement

Hawkish Biases and the Interdisciplinary Study of Conflict Decision-Making

  • Jonathan RenshonEmail author
  • Daniel Kahneman
Chapter

Abstract

Psychological biases strongly affect foreign policy decision-making. The authors argue that the biases recently uncovered by psychological research favor hawkish decisions in conflict situations. By “hawkish,” they refer to a propensity for suspicion, hostility and aggression in the conduct of conflict, and for less cooperation and trust when the resolution of a conflict is on the agenda. While much extant work examines links between cognitive biases and conflict, they offer a new and developed formulation based on the excellent insight of Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman in the field of psychology and Jonathan Renshon’s knowledge of IR and conflict.

Keywords

International Relation Cognitive Bias Prospect Theory Loss Aversion International Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

REFERENCES

  1. Allon, Y. 1976. Israel: The Case for Defensible Borders. Foreign Affairs 55: 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariely, D., J. Huber, et al. 2005. When Do Losses Loom Larger Than Gains? Journal of Marketing Research 42(2): 134–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R. 1973. Schema Theory: An Information Processing Model of Perception and Cognition. American Political Science Review 67(4): 1248–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baar, B.J. 1986. The Cognitive Revolution in Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bazerman, M.H. 1998. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2001. Why Negotiations Go Wrong. In The Negotiation Sourcebook, ed. I.G. Asherman, and S.V. Asherman. Amherst, MA: Human Resources Development Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brockner, J. 1992. The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress. Academy of Management Review 17(1): 39–61.Google Scholar
  8. Camerer, C., and D. Lovallo. 1999. Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach. American Economic Review 89(1): 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, J.D. 1986. Similarity and Uniqueness: The Effects of Attribute Type, Relevance, and Individual Differences in Self-Esteem and Depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(2): 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carmon, Z., and D. Ariely. 2000. Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and Sellers. Journal of Consumer Research 27(3): 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, A., C. Woo, et al. 1988. Entrepreneurs’ Perceived Chances for Success. Journal of Business Venturing 3(2): 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crary, W.G. 1966. Reactions to Incongruent Self-Experiences. Journal of Consulting Psychology 30(3): 246–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cross, K.P. 1977. Not Can, But Will College Teaching Be Improved? New Directions for Higher Education 17: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darley, J.M., and D. Batson. 1973. From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27: 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farnham, B. 1984. Avoiding Losses/Taking Risks: Prospect Theory and International Conflict. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fiegenbaum, A., and H. Thomas. 1988. Attitudes Toward Risk and the Risk-Return Paradox: Prospect Theory Explanations. Academy of Management Journal 31(1): 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedland, N., G. Keinan, et al. 1992. Controlling the Uncontrollable: Effects of Stress on Illusory Perceptions of Controllability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(6): 923–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner, H. 1987. The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. George, A. 1969. The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making. International Studies Quarterly 13(2): 190–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilovich, T., Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman. 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilovich, T., and K. Savitsky. 1999. The Spotlight Effect and the Illusion of Transparency: Egocentric Assessments of How We Are Seen by Others. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8(6): 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilovich, T., K. Savitsky, et al. 1998. The Illusion of Transparency: Biased Assessments of Others’ Ability to Read One’s Emotional States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(2): 332–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glaser, Markus, Thomas Langer, and Martin Weber. 2005. Overconfidence of Professionals and Lay Men: Individual Differences Within and Between Tasks? Working Paper.Google Scholar
  24. Greenwood, J.D. 1999. Understanding the ‘Cognitive Revolution’ in Psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 35(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guetzkow, H. 1959. A Use of Simulation in the Study of Inter-nation Relations. Behavioral Science 4(3): 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guetzkow, H., C. Alger, R. Brody, R. Noel, and R. Snyder. 1963. Simulation in International Relations: Developments for Research and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Heider, F. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heine, S.J., and D.R. Lehman. 1995. Cultural Variation in Unrealistic Optimism: Does the West Feel More Vulnerable Than The East? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(4): 595–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heradstveit, D. 1981. The Arab-Israeli Conflict: Psychological Obstacles to Peace. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Holsti, O. 1962. The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 6(3): 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jervis, R. 1968. Hypotheses on Misperception. World Politics 20(3): 454–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 1980. The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24(4): 563–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson, D.D.P. 2004. Overconfidence and War: The Havoc and Glory of Positive Illusions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, D.D.P., R. McDermott, et al. 2006. Overconfidence in Wargames: Experimental Evidence on Expectations, Aggression, Gender and Testosterone. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 273(1600): 2513–2520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones, E.E., and V.A. Harris. 1967. The Attribution of Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kahneman, D. 1991. Judgments and Decision Making: A Personal View. Psychological Science 2(3): 142–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  39. Kahneman, D., J.L. Knetsch, et al. 1990. Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98(6): 1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 1991. Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D., and J. Renshon. 2007. Why Hawks Win. Foreign Policy (158): 34–38.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2009. Hawkish Biases. In American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear: Threat Inflation Since 9/11, ed. T. Thrall, and J. Cramer, 79–96. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1972. Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness. Cognitive Psychology 3: 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–292.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 1995. Conflict Resolution: A Cognitive Perspective. In Barriers to Conflict Resolution, ed. K. Arrow, R.H. Mnookin, L. Ross, A. Tversky, and R. Wilson, 44–62. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2000. Choices, Values, and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kahneman, D., Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kramer, R.M. 1994. The Sinister Attribution Error: Paranoid Cognition and Collective Distrust in Organizations. Motivation and Emotion 18(2): 199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Langer, E.J. 1975. The Illusion of Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(2): 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Larson, D.W., and Alexei Shevchenko. 2010. Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy. International Security 34(4): 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levy, J.S. 1997. Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 41(1): 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. List, J.A. 2003. Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies? Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1): 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Loewen, P. J., Lior Sheffer, Stuart Soroka, Stefaan Walgrave, and Tamir Shaefer. 2014. Are Politicians Better Risky Decision Makers? Evidence from Experiments with Members of Parliament in Belgium, Canada and Israel. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  54. Luce, R.D., and H. Raiffa. 1957. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Courier Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  55. Maoz, I., A. Ward, et al. 2002. Reactive Devaluation of an “Israeli” vs. “Palestinian” Peace Proposal. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(4): 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marks, G. 1984. Thinking One’s Abilities Are Unique and One’s Opinions Are Common. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10(2): 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Martin, D.J., L.Y. Abramson, et al. 1984. Illusion of Control for Self and Others in Depressed and Nondepressed College Students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(1): 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McDermott, R. 2001. Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  59. McPeak, M.A. 1976. Israel: Borders and Security. Foreign Affairs 54: 426–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mercer, J. 1996. Reputations and International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Middletown, D. 1991. Sinai Pullout: Israel to Lose in Air Power. New York Times, New York: 9.Google Scholar
  62. Miller, G.A. 2003. The Cognitive Revolution: A Historical Perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(3): 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Neale, M.A., and M.H. Bazerman. 1985. The Effects of Framing and Negotiator Overconfidence on Bargaining Behaviors and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 28(1): 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nisbett, R. E., amd T. D. Wilson. 1977. Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review 84: 231–259.Google Scholar
  65. Novemsky, N., and D. Kahneman. 2005. How Do Intentions Affect Loss Aversion? Journal of Marketing Research 42(2): 139–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Perloff, L.S., and B.K. Fetzer. 1986. Self-other Judgments and Perceived Vulnerability to Victimization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(3): 502–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pietromonaco, P.R., and R. Nisbett. 1982. Swimming Upstream Against the Fundamental Attribution Error: Subjects’ Weak Generalizations from the Darley and Batson Study. Social Behavior and Personality 10(1): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Quattrone, G.A. 1982. Overattribution and Unit Formation: When Behavior Engulfs the Field. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Quattrone, G.A., and A. Tversky. 1988. Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice. American Political Science Review 82(3): 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rachlinski, J. 1996. Gaines, Losses and the Psychology of Litigation. Southern California Law Review 70(113): 113–185.Google Scholar
  71. Regan, D.T., E. Straus, et al. 1974. Liking and the Attribution Process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10(4): 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Renshon, Jonathan. 2015. Losing Face and Sinking Costs: Experimental Evidence on the Judgment of Political and Military Leaders. International Organization 69(3): 659–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Robertson, L.S. 1977. Car Crases: Perceived Vulnerability and Willingness to Pay for Crash Protection. Journal of Community Health 3(2): 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ross, L. 1977. The Intuitive Psychologist and his Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. L. Berkowitz, vol. 10, 173–220. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  75. Samuelson, W., and R. Zeckhauser. 1988. Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(1): 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schaubroeck, J., and E. Davis. 1994. Prospect Theory Predictions When Escalation Is Not The Only Chance to Recover Sunk Costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 57(1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sen, S., and E.J. Johnson. 1997. Mere-Possession Effects without Possession in Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research 24(1): 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sherman, S.J. 1980. On the Self-Erasing Nature of Errors of Prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(2): 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Silverman, I. 1964. Self-Esteem and Differential Responsiveness to Success and Failure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 69: 115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Simon, H. 1957. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Snyder, R.C., and G.D. Paige. 1958. The United States Decision to Resist Aggression in Korea: The Application of an Analytical Scheme. Administrative Science Quarterly 3(3): 341–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Staw, B.M. 1976. Knee-Deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment to a Chosen Course of Action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16(1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Svenson, O. 1981. Are We All Less Risky and More Skillful Than Our Fellow Drivers? Acta Psychologica 47(2): 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Taylor, S.E., and J.D. Brown. 1988. Illusion and Well-Being: A Social Psychological Perspective on Mental Health. Psychological Bulletin 103(2): 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thaler, R. 1980. Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1(1): 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. ———. 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211(4481): 453–458.Google Scholar
  88. Van Boven, L., T. Gilovich, et al. 2003. The Illusion of Transparency in Negotiations. Negotiation Journal 19(2): 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Van Evera, S. 1999. Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Weinstein, N.D. 1980. Unrealistic Optimism About Future Life Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(5): 806–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Whyte, G. 1993. Escalating Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Prospect Theory Approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54(3): 430–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilson, T.D., and D. Kraft. 1993. Why Do I Love Thee?: Effects of Repeated Introspections about a Dating Relationship on Attitudes toward the Relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19(4): 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wohlforth, William. 2009. Unipolarity, Status Competition and Great Power War. World Politics 61(1): 28–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yetiv, Steve A. 2004; 2nd edition 2011. Explaining Foreign Policy: U.S. Decision-Making & the Persian Gulf Wars. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Zechmeister, K., and D. Druckman. 1973. Determinants of Resolving a Conflict of Interest: A Simulation of Political Decision-Making. Journal of Conflict Resolution 17(1): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zinnes, D.A. 1966. A Comparison of Hostile Behavior of Decision-Makers in Simulated and Historical Data. World Politics 18(3): 474–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyPrinceton UniversityPrinceton, NJUSA

Personalised recommendations