Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Systemism and Foreign Policy Analysis: A New Approach to the Study of International Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations

Abstract

This work expands on the concept of “systemism,” which is a basic framework that can help in thinking more broadly about world affairs. Rather than theorizing strictly at the level of the system or its components, systemism (not to be confused with David Easton’s [1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf] “systems theory”) allows for linkages operating at multiple levels of analysis—at the macro- and micro-levels.

any discipline that borrows nothing from, and gives nothing in return to, other disciplines is worthless (Bunge 1996: 267).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alden, Chris, and Amnon Aran. 2012. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret A. 1996. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, Rev. edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, Michael. 1999. International Studies in the Twentieth Century and Beyond: Flawed Dichotomies, Synthesis, Cumulation. International Studies Quarterly 43: 231–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. International Political Earthquakes. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, Michael, and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 1997. A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breuning, Marijke. 2007. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, Mario. 1996. Finding Philosophy in Social Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Social Science Under Debate: A Philosophical Perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Hyunsun. 2011. Systemism. In 21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook, vol 1, ed. John T. Ishiyama, and Marijke Breuning, 29–33. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R.G.C. 1946. The Idea of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1965a. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1965b. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. The Analysis of Political Structure. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, John R. 2011. Systems Theory and Structural Functionalism. In 21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook, vol 1, ed. John T. Ishiyama, and Marijke Breuning, 71–80. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gerner, Deborah J. 1995. The Evolution of the Study of Foreign Policy. In Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation, ed. Laura Neack, Jeanne A.K. Hey, and Patrick Haney, 17–32. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Leslie. 1985. Support for the System. British Journal of Political Science 15: 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, Joseph M. 1995. The Maastricht Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union, and the Neo-Realist Research Programme. Review of International Studies 21: 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Frank P., and Patrick James. 2009. Deterrence and Compellence in Iraq, 1991–2003: Lessons for a Complex Paradigm. In Complex Deterrence: Strategy in the Global Age, ed. T.V. Paul, Patrick M. Morgan, and James J. Wirtz. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, Charles F. 1995. Epilogue: Reflections on Foreign Policy Theory Building. In Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation, ed. Laura Neack, Jeanne A.K. Hey, and Patrick Haney, 243–258. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Christopher. 2010. The Future of Foreign Policy Analysis. In The International Studies Encyclopedia, ed. Robert A. Denemark, 2573–2590. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Valerie M. 2005. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory, 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Valerie M., with Christopher S. Vore. 1995. Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review 39: 209–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Patrick. 2002a. Systemism and International Relations: Toward a Reassessment of Realism. In Millennial Reflections on International Studies, ed. Michael Brecher, and Frank P. Harvey, 131–142. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. International Relations and Scientific Progress: Structural Realism Reconsidered. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Constitutional Politics in Canada After the Charter: Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Systemism. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Deterrence and Systemism: A Diagrammatic Exposition of Deterrence-Related Processes Leading to the War in Iraq. St. Antony’s International Review 7: 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Carolyn C., and Özgür Özdamar. 2009. Modeling Foreign Policy and Ethnic Conflict: Turkey’s Policies Toward Syria. Foreign Policy Analysis 5: 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert. 1998. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaarbo, Julie. 2015. The Domestic Politics & Decision Making Turn in IR Theory: An FPA Perspective. International Studies Review 17(2): 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesgin, Baris. 2011. Foreign Policy Analysis. In 21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook, ed. John T. Ishiyama, and Marijke Breuning, 336–343. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, Peter. 1972. General Theory in Political Science: A Critique of Easton’s Systems Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 2: 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, Christian, and Kai Spiekermann. 2013. Methodological Individualism and Holism in Political Science: A Reconciliation. American Political Science Review 107: 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, Patrick J., and Howard B. Shapiro. 1973. The Comparative Study of Foreign Policy: A Survey of Scientific Findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Alex, and Karl DeRouen. 2010. Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neack, Laura. 2008. The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era, 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The New Foreign Policy: Complex Interactions, 3rd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, Andreas. 2007. Rethinking Systems Theory: A Programmatic Introduction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37: 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James N. 1966. Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy. In Approaches in Comparative and International Politics, ed. R. Barry Farrell. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Richard C., H.W. Bruck, and Burton Sapin. 1954. Decision-Making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprout, Harold, and Margaret Sprout. 1956. Man-Milieu Relationship Hypotheses in the Context of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetiv, Steve A. 2011. Explaining Foreign Policy: U.S. Decision-Making in the Gulf Wars, 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Oran R. 1968. Systems of Political Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Studies, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA, USA

    Carolyn C. James

  2. School of International Relations, USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Patrick James

Authors
  1. Carolyn C. James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick James .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of International Relations, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

    Steve A. Yetiv

  2. Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA

    Patrick James

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

James, C.C., James, P. (2017). Systemism and Foreign Policy Analysis: A New Approach to the Study of International Conflict. In: Yetiv, S., James, P. (eds) Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40823-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation