Skip to main content

The Role of Commercial Biomarker Assay Kits in Preclinical and Clinical Trials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Translating Molecular Biomarkers into Clinical Assays

Part of the book series: AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series ((AAPS,volume 21))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to discuss the role of commercial assay kits when quantitatively measuring biomarkers to support preclinical and clinical drug development programs. Research use only and clinical diagnostic kits will be compared and their usefulness addressed in the context of the 2013 FDA draft guidance on bioanalytical method validation. Analytical method performance characteristics will be discussed as well as mechanisms to generate consistent biomarker data throughout the life of the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Biomarker:

A characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic response to a therapeutic intervention

Definitive Quantitative Assay:

Uses calibrators fit to a regression model to calculate the absolute quantitative values for unknown samples and the reference standards are well defined and fully representative of the endogenous biomarker

Bioanalytical Method Validation:

A formal process of evaluating the analytical performance characteristics of an assay to ensure it provides reliable data

Research Use Only kits:

Commercial assay reagents and components intended to be used to generate research quality data

Clinical Diagnostic Kits:

FDA approved reagents and components intended to be used for the diagnosis of human disease and medical risk factors

References

  1. Krishna R, Herman G, Wagner JA (2008) Accelerating drug development using biomarkers: a case study with Sitagliptin, a novel DPP4 inhibitor for type 2 diabetes. AAPS J 10(2):401–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Colburn WA (2003) Biomarkers in drug discovery and development: from target identification through drug marketing. J Clin Pharmacol 43(4):329–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams SA, Slavin DE, Wagner JA, Webster CJ (2006) A cost-effectiveness approach to the qualification and acceptance of biomarkers. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5(11):897–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Woodcock J (2009) Chutes and ladders on the critical path: comparative effectiveness, product value, and the use of biomarkers in drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 86(1):12–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. US FDA. Innovation or stagnation? Challenge and opportunity on the critical path to new medical products. www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/04/briefing/4039b1_03_Critical%20Path%20whitepaper.pdf

  6. Lee JW, Smith WC, Nordblom GD, Bowsher RR (2003) Validation of assays for the bioanalysis of novel biomarkers. In: Bloom JC, Dean RA (eds) Biomarkers in clinical drug development. Marcel Dekker, NY, USA, pp 119–149

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bowsher RR (2003) Analytical validation of assays for novel biomarkers. Presented at AAPS Workshop, Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development. Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JW, Weiner RS, Sailstad JM et al (2005) Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development: a conference report. Pharm Res 22:499–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JW, Devanarayan V, Barrett YC et al (2006) Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement. Pharm Res 23:312–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chau CH, Rixie O, McLeod H et al (2008) Validation of analytical methods for biomarkers used in drug development. Clin Cancer Res 14(19):5967–5976

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. AAPS Workshop. Biomarker assay development and validation: challenges and creative solutions associated with emerging biomarker assays. Georgia World Congress Center, Atlanta, GA, USA, 15–16 Nov 2008

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JW, Hall M (2009) Method validation of protein biomarkers in support of drug development or clinical diagnosis/prognosis. J Chromatrogr B 877:1259–1271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bowsher RR, Sailstad JM (2008) Insights in the application of research-grade diagnostic kits for biomarker assessments in support of clinical drug metabolism: bioanalysis of circulating concentrations of soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor Κb ligand. J Pharm Biomed Anal 48:1282–1289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nowatzke WL, Cole TG, Bowsher RR (2010) Systematic analytical validation of commercial kits for the determination of novel biomarkers for clinical drug development. Bioanalysis 2(2):237–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan MU, Bowsher RR, Cameron M et al (2015) Recommendations for adaption and validation of commercial kits for biomarker quantification in drug development. Bioanalysis 7(2):229–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guidance for Industry On Bioanalytical Method Validation (2001) Fed Reg 66:28526–28527

    Google Scholar 

  17. Viswanathan CT, Bansal S, Booth B et al (2007) Quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: best practices for chromatographic and ligand binding assays. Pharm Res 24(10):1962–1973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, 42 USC 201 note, Public Law 100-578, 102 STAT.2903

    Google Scholar 

  19. Draft Guidance for Industry On Bioanalytical Method Validation. Federal Register 78 FR 56718, 56718–56719 (2013). AAPS Workshop. Quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: The 2013 Revised FDA Guidance. Baltimore Hilton, Baltimore, MD, USA, 03–05 Dec (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Booth B, Arnold ME, DeSilva B et al (2014) Workshop report: Crystal City V-quantitative bioanalytical method validation and implementation: the 2013 revised FDA guidance. AAPS J 17(2):277–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang J, Lee J, Burns D et al (2009) “Fit-for-purpose” method validation and application of a biomarker (c-terminal telopeptides of type 1 collagen) in denosumab clinical studies. AAPS J 11(2):385–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Nowatzke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nowatzke, W., Bowsher, R.R. (2016). The Role of Commercial Biomarker Assay Kits in Preclinical and Clinical Trials. In: Weiner, R., Kelley, M. (eds) Translating Molecular Biomarkers into Clinical Assays . AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40793-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics