Advertisement

The Hierarchization of Migration

Return as Reinforcement of Socio-Economic Stratification
Chapter
  • 257 Downloads
Part of the Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship book series (MDC)

Abstract

In this chapter, Van Houte interrogates the expectations about the socio-economic characteristics of return migrants that inform the debate on the linkages between return migration, development and peace-building. Van Houte explores the interplay between socio-economic background, the migration experience, post-return embeddedness and mobility. By doing so, the author explores a new avenue of the hierarchization of mobility: the socio-economic stratification among voluntary and involuntary return migrants. Van Houte argues that socio-economic differences that existed prior to migration are reinforced by the migration experience, and that this results in strongly differentiated patterns of multidimensional embeddedness and transnational mobility upon return. These patterns reinforce previously existing socio-economic stratification and restrict expectations of return migration and development.

Keywords

Host Country Return Migrant Migration Experience Refugee Status Security Situation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbasi-Shavazi, Mohammad Jalal, Rasoul Sadeghi, Hossein Mahmoudian, and Gholamreza Jamshidiha. 2012. Marriage and Family Formation of the Second-Generation Afghans in Iran: Insights from a Qualitative Study. International Migration Review 46(4): 828–860. doi: 10.1111/imre.12002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ali, Nadje, Richard Black, and Khalid Koser. 2001. Refugees and Transnationalism: The Experience of Bosnians and Eritreans in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27(4): 615–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammassari, Savina. 2004. From Nation-Building to Entrepreneurship: The Impact of Élite Return Migrants in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana. Population, Space and Place 10(2): 133–154. doi: 10.1002/psp.319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakewell, Oliver. 2008. ‘Keeping Them in Their Place’: The Ambivalent Relationship Between Development and Migration in Africa. Third World Quarterly 29(7): 1341–1358. doi: 10.1080/01436590802386492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1998. Globalization: The Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blitz, Brad K., Rosemary Sales, and Lisa Marzano. 2005. Non-Voluntary Return? The Politics of Return to Afghanistan. Political Studies 53(1): 182–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00523.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloch, Alice. 2008. Zimbabweans in Britain: Transnational Activities and Capabilities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34(2): 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braakman, Marije. 2005. Roots and Routes. Questions of Home, Belonging and Return in an Afghan Diaspora. Master’s Thesis, Cultural Anthropology and Sociology of non-Western Societies, Leiden University, Leiden.Google Scholar
  9. Carling, Jørgen. 2002. Migration in the Age of Involuntary Immobility: Theoretical Reflections and Cape Verdean Experiences. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 28(1): 5–42. doi: 10.1080/13691830120103912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2004. Emigration, Return and Development in Cape Verde: The Impact of Closing Borders. Population, Space and Place 10(2): 113–132. doi: 10.1002/psp.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassarino, Jean-Pierre. 2004. Theorising Return Migration: The Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants Revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies (IJMS) 6(2): 253–279.Google Scholar
  12. Castles, Stephen. 2005. Nation and Empire: Hierarchies of Citizenship in the New Global Order. International Politics 42(2): 203–224. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2007. Twenty-First-Century Migration as a Challenge to Sociology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33(3): 351–371. doi: 10.1080/13691830701234491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castles, Stephen, Hein De Haas, and Mark J. Miller. 2014. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. 5th ed. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castles, Stephen, and Mark J. Miller. 2009. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. 4th ed. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Collins, Joseph J. 2011. Understanding War in Afghanistan. Washington: National Defence University Press.Google Scholar
  17. De Haas, Hein. 2005. International Migration, Remittances and Development: Myths and Facts. Third World Quarterly 26(8): 1269–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2010. Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective. International Migration Review 44(1): 227–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dekker, Bram, and Melissa Siegel. 2013. Transnationalism and Integration: Complements or Substitutes? In UNU-MERIT Working Papers. Maastricht: Maastricht Graduate School of Governance.Google Scholar
  20. Erdal, Marta Bivand, and Ceri Oeppen. 2013. Migrant Balancing Acts: Understanding the Interactions Between Integration and Transnationalism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39(6): 867–884. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.765647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Faist, Thomas. 2004. The Transnational Turn in Migration Research: Perspectives for the Study of Politics and Polity. In Transnational Spaces: Disciplinary Perpectives, ed. Maja Povrzanovic Frykman, 11–45. Malmö: International Migration and Ethnic Relations, Malmö University.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2008. Migrants as Transnational Development Agents: An Inquiry into the Newest Round of the Migration–Development Nexus. Population, Space and Place 14(1): 21–42. doi: 10.1002/psp.471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, Jonathan, and Roland Kostić. 2009. Does Integration Encourage Reconciliatory Attitudes among Diasporas? In Global Migration and Transnational Politics Working Paper. Fairfax: Center for Global Studies, George Mason University.Google Scholar
  25. Hess, Martin. 2004. ‘Spatial’ Relationships? Towards a Reconceptualization of Embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography 28(2): 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horst, Heather A. 2007. ‘You Can’t Be Two Places at Once’: Rethinking Transnationalism Through Jamaican Return Migration. Identities 14(1–2): 63–83. doi: 10.1080/10702890601102522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hyndman, Jennifer. 2012. The Geopolitics of Migration and Mobility. Geopolitics 17(2): 243–255. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2011.569321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IRIN. 2011. Migration: Afghan Asylum-Seekers Hit by Tighter Immigration Rules. IRIN [cited 27 March 2014]. Available from http://www.irinnews.org/Report/92329/MIGRATION-Afghan-asylum-seekers-hit-by-tighter-immigration-rules
  29. Jain, Sonali. 2012. For Love and Money: Second-Generation Indian-Americans ‘Return’ to India. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36(5): 896–914. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2011.641576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jazayery, Leila. 2002. The Migration–Development Nexus: Afghanistan Case Study. International Migration 40(5): 231–254. doi: 10.1111/1468-2435.00218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, Russell. 2012. Geography and Migration Studies: Retrospect and Prospect. Population, Space and Place 18(2): 134–153. doi: 10.1002/psp.685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kloosterman, Robert C., Joanne Van Der Leun, and Jan Rath. 1999. Mixed Embeddedness: (In) Formal Economic Activities and Immigrant Businesses in the Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23(2): 252–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kloosterman, Robert C. 2010. Matching Opportunities with Resources: A Framework for Analysing (Migrant) Entrepreneurship from a Mixed Embeddedness Perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 22(1): 25–45. doi: 10.1080/08985620903220488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levitt, Peggy, and Ninna Nyberg Sørensen. 2004. The Transnational Turn in Migration Studies. In Global Migration Perspectives. Geneva: Global Commission on International Migration.Google Scholar
  35. Lubkemann, Stephen C. 2008. Involuntary Immobility: On a Theoretical Invisibility in Forced Migration Studies. Journal of Refugee Studies 21(4): 454–475. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fen043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marsden, Peter. 1999. Repatriation and Reconstruction: The Case of Afghanistan. In The End of the Refugee Cycle? Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction, ed. Richard Black and Khalid Koser, 56–68. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  37. Mazzucato, Valentina. 2008. The Double Engagement: Transnationalism and Integration. Ghanaian Migrants’ Lives Between Ghana and The Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34(2): 199–216. doi: 10.1080/13691830701823871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2011. Reverse Remittances in the Migration–Development Nexus: Two-Way Flows Between Ghana and the Netherlands. Population, Space and Place 17(5): 454–468. doi: 10.1002/psp.646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nagel, Caroline R., and Lynn A. Staeheli. 2004. Citizenship, Identity and Transnational Migration: Arab Immigrants to the United States. Space and Polity 8(1): 3–23. doi: 10.1080/13562570410001678860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oeppen, Ceri. 2009. A Stranger at Home: Integration, Transnationalism and the Afghan Elite. Sussex: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 2012. A Stranger at ‘Home’: Interactions Between Transnational Return Visits and Integration for Afghan-American Professionals. Global Networks 13(2): 261–278. doi: 10.1111/glob.12008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piotrowski, Martin, and Yuying Tong. 2013. Straddling Two Geographic Regions: The Impact of Place of Origin and Destination on Return Migration Intentions in China. Population, Space and Place 19(3): 329–349. doi: 10.1002/psp.1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Portes, Alejandro. 1999. Conclusion: Towards a New World—The Origins and Effects of Transnational Activities. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(2): 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Portes, Alejandro, and Julia Sensenbrenner. 1993. Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action. American Journal of Sociology 98(6): 1320–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schuster, Liza. 2011. Turning Refugees into ‘Illegal Migrants’: Afghan Asylum Seekers in Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies 34(8): 1392–1407. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2010.535550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schuster, Liza, and Nassim Majidi. 2013. What Happens Post-deportation? The Experience of Deported Afghans. Migration Studies 1(2): 221–240. doi: 10.1093/migration/mns011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sherrell, Kathy, and Jennifer Hyndman. 2006. Global Minds, Local Bodies: Kosovar Transnational Connections Beyond British Columbia. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees 23(1): 16–26.Google Scholar
  48. Sørensen, Ninna Nyberg, Nicholas Van Hear, and Poul Engberg-Pedersen. 2002. The Migration-Development Nexus: Evidence and Policy Options. International Migration 40(5): 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stigter, Elca. 2006. Afghan Migratory Strategies—An Assesment of Repatriation and Sustainable Return in Response to the Convention Plus. Refugee Survey Quarterly 25(2): 109–122. doi: 10.1093/rsq/hdi0129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Turton, David, and Peter Marsden. 2002. Taking Refugees for a Ride? The Politics of Refugee Return to Afghanistan. In Issues Paper Series. Islamabad: The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU).Google Scholar
  51. Van Houte, Marieke, Melissa Siegel, and Tine Davids. 2016. Deconstructing the Meanings of and Motivations for Migration: An Afghan Return Migration Case Study. Comparative Migration Studies 4(1): 21. doi: 10.1186/s40878-016-0042-y.
  52. Vertovec, Steven. 2001. Transnationalism and Identity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27(4): 573–582. doi: 10.1080/13691830120090386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Migration Institute Department of International DevelopmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations