Advertisement

Meanings of and Motivations for Return

Deconstructing the Complexity of Voluntary and Involuntary Return
Chapter
  • 268 Downloads
Part of the Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship book series (MDC)

Abstract

This chapter proposes an analytical framework for investigating the complex meanings of and motivations for migration and return. Both policy and research have so far insufficiently addressed the complexity of voluntary and involuntary return. The proposed framework recognizes migration and return as processes that take place under different structural circumstances, with different capacities and desires, creating different levels of agency. The complex and sometimes seemingly contradictory narratives of Afghan returnees are discussed to deconstruct the policy-oriented dichotomy between voluntary and involuntary return. In conclusion, while pleading that the complexities of return be taken into account, the author proposes to centralize post-return mobility as an indicator for voluntary or involuntary return.

Keywords

Host Country Legal Status Structural Reality Asylum Seeker Undocumented Migrant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbasi-Shavazi, Mohammad Jalal, Rasoul Sadeghi, Hossein Mahmoudian, and Gholamreza Jamshidiha. 2012. Marriage and Family Formation of the Second-Generation Afghans in Iran: Insights from a Qualitative Study. International Migration Review 46(4): 828–860. doi: 10.1111/imre.12002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ali, Nadje, Richard Black, and Khalid Koser. 2001. Refugees and Transnationalism: The Experience of Bosnians and Eritreans in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27(4): 615–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammassari, Savina. 2004. From Nation-Building to Entrepreneurship: The Impact of Élite Return Migrants in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana. Population, Space and Place 10(2): 133–154. doi: 10.1002/psp.319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakewell, Oliver. 2008. ‘Keeping Them in Their Place’: The Ambivalent Relationship Between Development and Migration in Africa. Third World Quarterly 29(7): 1341–1358. doi: 10.1080/01436590802386492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2010. Some Reflections on Structure and Agency in Migration Theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(10): 1689–1708. doi: 10.1080/1369183x.2010.489382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beltman, Daan. 2012. Voluntary Return Facilities for Aliens Without Residence Permits in Comparative Perspective. In Cross Border Welfare State. Immigration, Social Security and Integration, ed. G.J. Vonk. Antwerpen: Intersentia.Google Scholar
  7. Black, Richard, and Saskia Gent. 2006. Sustainable Return in Post-conflict Contexts. International Migration 44(3): 15–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2006.00370.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blitz, Brad K., Rosemary Sales, and Lisa Marzano. 2005. Non-Voluntary Return? The Politics of Return to Afghanistan. Political Studies 53(1): 182–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00523.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloch, Alice. 2008. Zimbabweans in Britain: Transnational Activities and Capabilities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34(2): 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braakman, Marije. 2005. Roots and Routes. Questions of Home, Belonging and Return in an Afghan Diaspora. Master’s Thesis, Cultural Anthropology and Sociology of non-Western Societies, Leiden University, Leiden.Google Scholar
  11. Braakman, Marije, and Angela Schlenkhoff. 2007. Between Two Worlds: Feelings of Belonging While in Exile and the Question of Return. Asien 104(3): 9–22.Google Scholar
  12. Brees, Inge. 2010. Refugees and Transnationalism on the Thai–Burmese Border. Global Networks 10(2): 282–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00286.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carling, Jørgen. 2002. Migration in the Age of Involuntary Immobility: Theoretical Reflections and Cape Verdean Experiences. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 28(1): 5–42. doi: 10.1080/13691830120103912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2004. Emigration, Return and Development in Cape Verde: The Impact of Closing Borders. Population, Space and Place 10(2): 113–132. doi: 10.1002/psp.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cassarino, Jean-Pierre. 2004. Theorising Return Migration: The Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants Revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies (IJMS) 6(2): 253–279.Google Scholar
  16. Castles, Stephen. 2003. Towards a Sociology of Forced Migration and Social Transformation. Sociology 37(1): 13–34. doi: 10.1177/0038038503037001384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2007. Twenty-First-Century Migration as a Challenge to Sociology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33(3): 351–371. doi: 10.1080/13691830701234491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Castles, Stephen, Hein De Haas, and Mark J. Miller. 2014. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. 5th ed. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Castles, Stephen, and Mark J. Miller. 2009. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. 4th ed. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Chimni, B.S. 2000. Globalization, Humanitarianism and the Erosion of Refugee Protection. Journal of Refugee Studies 13(3): 243–263. doi: 10.1093/jrs/13.3.243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Collins, Joseph J. 2011. Understanding War in Afghanistan. Washington: National Defence University Press.Google Scholar
  22. De Haas, Hein. 2010. Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective. International Migration Review 44(1): 227–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dolan, Chris. 1999. Repatriation from South Africa to Mozambique–Undermining Durable Solutions? In The End of the Refugee Cycle? Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction, ed. Richard Black and Khalid Koser, 85–108. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  24. Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann Mische. 1998. What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962–1023. doi: 10.1086/231294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammond, Laura. 1999. Examining the Discourse of Repatriation: Towards a More Proactive Theory of Return Migration. In The End of the Refugee Cycle? Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction, ed. Richard Black and Khalid Koser, 227–244. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  26. Hitlin, Steven, and Glen H. Elder. 2007. Time, Self, and the Curiously Abstract Concept of Agency. Sociological Theory 25(2): 170–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00303.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hyndman, Jennifer. 2012. The Geopolitics of Migration and Mobility. Geopolitics 17(2): 243–255. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2011.569321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IRIN. 2011. Migration: Afghan Asylum-Seekers Hit by Tighter Immigration Rules. IRIN [cited 27 March 2014]. Available from http://www.irinnews.org/Report/92329/MIGRATION-Afghan-asylum-seekers-hit-by-tighter-immigration-rules
  29. Jazayery, Leila. 2002. The Migration–Development Nexus: Afghanistan Case Study. International Migration 40(5): 231–254. doi: 10.1111/1468-2435.00218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, Richard C. 2011. The Local Economic Imprint of Return Migrants in Bolivia. Population, Space and Place 17(5): 435–453. doi: 10.1002/psp.626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, Russell. 2012. Geography and Migration Studies: Retrospect and Prospect. Population, Space and Place 18(2): 134–153. doi: 10.1002/psp.685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koser, Khalid, and Richard Black. 1999. The End of the Refugee Cycle? In The End of the Refugee Cylce? Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction, ed. Richard Black and Khalid Koser, 2–17. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  33. Lubkemann, Stephen C. 2008. Involuntary Immobility: On a Theoretical Invisibility in Forced Migration Studies. Journal of Refugee Studies 21(4): 454–475. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fen043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malkki, Liisa. 1992. National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity Among Scholars and Refugees. Cultural Anthropology 7(1): 24–44. doi: 10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marsden, Peter. 1999. Repatriation and Reconstruction: The Case of Afghanistan. In The End of the Refugee Cycle? Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction, ed. Richard Black and Khalid Koser, 56–68. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  36. Monsutti, Alessandro. 2008. Afghan Migratory Strategies and the Three Solutions to the Refugee Problem. Refugee Survey Quarterly 27(1): 58–73. doi: 10.1093/rsq/hdn007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oeppen, Ceri. 2009. A Stranger at Home: Integration, Transnationalism and the Afghan Elite. Sussex: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  38. Omata, Naohiko. 2013. The Complexity of Refugees’ Return Decision-Making in a Protracted Exile: Beyond the Home-Coming Model and Durable Solutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39(8): 1281–1297. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.778149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Özerdem, Alpaslan, and Abdul Hai Sofizada. 2006. Sustainable Reintegration to Returning Refugees in Post-Taliban Afghanistan: Land-Related Challenges. Conflict, Security & Development 6(1): 75–100. doi: 10.1080/14678800600590678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruben, Ruerd, Marieke Van Houte, and Tine Davids. 2009. What Determines the Embeddedness of Forced-Return Migrants? Rethinking the Role of Pre- and Post-Return Assistance. International Migration Review 43(4): 908–937. doi:  10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00789.x.Google Scholar
  41. Schuster, Liza. 2011. Turning Refugees into ‘Illegal Migrants’: Afghan Asylum Seekers in Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies 34(8): 1392–1407. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2010.535550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sewell, William H. Jr. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1–29. doi: 10.2307/2781191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stein, Barry N., and Frederick C. Cuny. 1994. Refugee Repatriation During Conflict: Protection and Post-Return Assistance. Development in Practice 4(3): 173–187. doi: 10.1080/096145249100077811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stigter, Elca. 2006. Afghan Migratory Strategies—An Assesment of Repatriation and Sustainable Return in Response to the Convention Plus. Refugee Survey Quarterly 25(2): 109–122. doi: 10.1093/rsq/hdi0129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tsuda, Takeyuki. 1999. The Permanence of ‘Temporary’ Migration: The ‘Structural Embeddedness’ of Japanese-Brazilian Immigrant Workers in Japan. The Journal of Asian Studies 58(3): 687–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turton, David, and Peter Marsden. 2002. Taking Refugees for a Ride? The Politics of Refugee Return to Afghanistan. In Issues Paper Series. Islamabad: The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU).Google Scholar
  47. Van Houte, Marieke, and Tine Davids. 2008. Development and Return Migration: from Policy Panacea to Migrant Perspective Sustainability. Third World Quarterly 29(7): 1411–1429. doi:  10.1080/01436590802386658.Google Scholar
  48. Van Houte, Marieke, Melissa Siegel, and Tine Davids. 2016. Deconstructing the Meanings of and Motivations for Migration: An Afghan Return Migration Case Study. Comparative Migration Studies 4(1): 21. doi: 10.1186/s40878-016-0042-y.
  49. Zetter, Roger. 1999. Reconceptualizing the Myth of Return: Contuity and Transition Amongst the Greek-Cypriot Refugees of 1974. Journal of Refugee Studies 12(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1093/jrs/12.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimmermann, Susan. 2012. Understanding Repatriation: Refugee Perspectives on the Importance of Safety, Reintegration, and Hope. Population, Space and Place 18(1): 45–57. doi: 10.1002/psp.647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Migration Institute Department of International DevelopmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations