Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout the ages, dreaming has served as an analogy for the creation of literary fictions to such an extent that this analogy has turned into a metaphorical commonplace, evoked whenever we nonchalantly refer to Hollywood as a dream factory or to our nocturnal dreams as a dream theatre. Depending on cultural context and individual inclination, the metaphor of fiction as dream has been either negatively or positively connoted, ranging from a view of dreams as meaningless fancies to a view of dreams as divine revelations. Countless writers have, moreover, embraced the notion of a ‘dream-and-literature-symbiosis’, claiming to find creative inspiration and sustenance in their dreams, while their experiences have in turn inspired philosophical reflections. Thus, the Italian Renaissance philosopher Girolamo Cardano (1501–1576) viewed dreaming and artistic creation as analogous processes, showing ‘an awareness that dream and art function as modes capable of extending the imagination’s creative powers’. Paracelsus (1493–1541), too, acknowledged the dream’s creative potential and its inspirational value for artists: ‘Frome time immemorial artistic insights have been revealed to artists in their sleep and in dreams, so that at all times they ardently desired them’. With the rise of Romanticism the aesthetic quality of the dream itself was increasingly emphasized, culminating in Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s (1772–1834) view of poetry as a ‘rationalized dream’ and Jean Paul’s (1763–1825) notion of dreaming as ‘involuntary poetry’. Even Robert Macnish (1802–1837), a nineteenth-century philosopher firmly rooted in the materialist tradition, marvelled that the imagination could produce dreams ‘lighted up with Prothean fire of genius and romance; […] magnificent poetry; [and] peopled with new and unheard-of imagery’. These ideas still reverberate in present times, for instance in Jorge Luis Borges’ (1899–1986) rephrasing of Coleridge and Jean Paul respectively in his references to literature as a ‘directed dream’ and to the act of dreaming as ‘perhaps the most ancient aesthetic expression’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rupprecht (2007), 4.

  2. 2.

    Primm (1987), 163.

  3. 3.

    Paracelsus quoted in Primm (1987), 166. One such example from the Renaissance period is Albrecht Dürer (1471–1528). See Schmidt-Hannisa (2001a), 85.

  4. 4.

    Hans-Walter Schmidt-Hannisa convincingly argues that the Romantics were the first to establish an understanding of the dream as aesthetic experience. See Schmidt-Hannisa (2001a), 84.

  5. 5.

    Coleridge, Notebooks, vol. 1, 2086.

  6. 6.

    See Schmidt-Hannisa (2001b).

  7. 7.

    Macnish, The Philosophy of Sleep, 67.

  8. 8.

    Borges, Seven Nights, 40. For other examples of writers inspired by their dreams, see Epel (1993), Townley (1998) and Royle (1996).

  9. 9.

    Oatley (2011), 2.

  10. 10.

    Oatley (2011), 3.

  11. 11.

    Oatley (2011), 16.

  12. 12.

    Oatley (2011), 18.

  13. 13.

    Turner (1996).

  14. 14.

    This is documented by the sheer number of anthologies featuring literary dreams. See De La Mare (1984 [1939]), Hill (1968), Almansi and Béguin (1986b), Brook (2002) and Gidion (2006). For useful overviews on dreams in literature, see Atchity and Atchity (1990), Rupprecht (1991) and Rupprecht (2007).

  15. 15.

    For the universality of the dream experience, see Bosnak (2007), 9; Parman (1991); and Solomonova et al. (2011), 174.

  16. 16.

    See Aserinsky and Kleitman (1953). In 1953, Eugene Aserinsky and Nathaniel Kleitman discovered that sleep consists of two cyclically alternating states, REM (rapid eye movement) and NREM (non-rapid eye movement) sleep. During REM sleep, we experience our most vivid and extensive dreams, although dreaming can occur during NREM sleep as well as in the early and late hypnagogic stages of sleep, upon falling asleep and upon waking up.

  17. 17.

    See Hobson (1988), 7.

  18. 18.

    Byron, ‘The Dream’ (1816) quoted in De La Mare (1984 [1939]), 386.

  19. 19.

    A relatively rare exception are lucid dreams, in which the dreamer is aware that he or she is dreaming and may even be able to direct and manipulate dream events to some extent. See LaBerge (1993), 338–341.

  20. 20.

    For examples, see Stevens (1995), 278–291; Barrett (2001); and Bulkeley (2010), 31–46.

  21. 21.

    Cavallero and Foulkes (1993b), 1.

  22. 22.

    Dement (1999), 293.

  23. 23.

    Gover and Kahn (2010), 181–182.

  24. 24.

    Miller (1994), 15.

  25. 25.

    Parman (1991), 27.

  26. 26.

    Parman (1991), 27.

  27. 27.

    Miller (1994), 43.

  28. 28.

    Hobbes, Leviathan, 11.

  29. 29.

    Bacon, The Advancement of Learning, 368.

  30. 30.

    Browne, ‘On Dreams,’ 344.

  31. 31.

    To give just one example, in his Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Marcrobius, in the early fifth century, outlined three different types of reliable dreams: in the oracular dream (oraculum), the future is revealed by a revered figure of authority; in the prophetic dream (visio), the dreamer is shown events that come literally true; and in the enigmatic dream (somnium), which can occur in five different varieties, the dreamer is presented with ambiguous images that require interpretation. These dreams were clearly set apart from their insignificant peers, namely the insomnium, a meaningless wish-fulfilment and memory dream, and the v isum, referring to hypnagogic visions and nightmares and considered equally meaningless. See Miller (1994), 96.

  32. 32.

    One exception here is lucid dreaming, during which the dreamer is able to influence the dream events and even to communicate with dream researchers via predetermined signals. See LaBerge (1988).

  33. 33.

    Edelman (1989), 212, quoted in States (1993), 42.

  34. 34.

    Hobson (1988), 133.

  35. 35.

    Alvarez, Night, 98.

  36. 36.

    Foulkes (1990), 41.

  37. 37.

    Blanchot (1982), 163.

  38. 38.

    Gover and Kahn (2010), 182.

  39. 39.

    Schwartz (2000), 56.

  40. 40.

    Bulkeley (1999), 5.

  41. 41.

    Kuiken (1991a), 185.

  42. 42.

    Kuiken (1991a), 185.

  43. 43.

    Farbman (2008), 8.

  44. 44.

    Farbman (2008), 8.

  45. 45.

    Farbman (2008), 10.

  46. 46.

    Massey (2009), 14.

  47. 47.

    Cooke (2012), 16.

  48. 48.

    Cooke (2012), 16.

  49. 49.

    See Domhoff (2001a, 8–13) for a summary of ‘the main empirical findings that explain why Freudian theory is not considered viable by most dream researchers’ (4). See also Carroll (2004), who criticizes scholars in the humanities for continuing ‘to repeat the formulas of Freud, Marx, Saussure, Lévi-Strauss—formulas that have now been obsolete in their own fields for decades’ (x).

  50. 50.

    See Richardson (1999), 158.

  51. 51.

    Lakoff and Johnson (1999).

  52. 52.

    Solms und Turnbull (2002), 5.

  53. 53.

    Solms und Turnbull (2002), 11.

  54. 54.

    Spolsky (2001), 7.

  55. 55.

    Richardson (2001), 63. Richardson here refers to the title of Stephen Kosslyn and Oliver Koenig’s Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience (New York: Free Press, 1992).

  56. 56.

    Willems and Jacobs (2016), 244.

  57. 57.

    Hogan (2003), 4.

  58. 58.

    Hall (1953a), 274.

  59. 59.

    Cavallero and Foulkes (1993b), 1.

  60. 60.

    Cavallero and Foulkes (1993b), 3.

  61. 61.

    See Kuiken (1991a); McNamara (2008), 11; and Barcaro and Paoli (2015).

  62. 62.

    See Alt (2002), 359–373 and Farbman (2008), 8–10.

  63. 63.

    McNamara (2008), 83.

  64. 64.

    See Ryan (2010), 476.

  65. 65.

    Lamarque and Olsen (2004), 207.

  66. 66.

    Domhoff (2003), 32.

  67. 67.

    Gregor (1981), 389, quoted in Domhoff (2003), 32. This was Gregor’s conclusion after conducting a study of dream reports from a small group of natives in the Amazon jungle.

  68. 68.

    Hall (1968), xviii.

  69. 69.

    Coleridge, Notebooks, vol. 3, 4409.

  70. 70.

    See Schönhammer (2004).

  71. 71.

    Dickens, The Selected Letters, 226.

  72. 72.

    Hogan (2003), 3.

  73. 73.

    Cartwright (2010), 6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schrage-Früh, M. (2016). Introduction. In: Philosophy, Dreaming and the Literary Imagination. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40724-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics